Why an Income Tax is the Only Fair Tax

Last updated on: July 30, 2020 at 7:27 am by Roger E. Olson

Why an Income Tax is the Only Fair Tax 2020-07-30T07:27:54-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Why an Income Tax Is the Only Fair Tax

Best Use for 1040-SR Tax Form for Seniors

*I write here as a Christian ethicist, but I think what I argue does not depend on Christianity*

When I was a kid growing up in the capital city of a state in the Upper Midwest of the U.S. my parents had to pay a “personal property tax” every year. I don’t recall whether it was imposed by the city, the county or the state or some combination (as with most “real property taxes”). So far as I know, no place in the U.S. now has a personal property tax. It was finally recognized as regressive and abolished. (I am open to correction if there are still any places that have such.)

What was a “personal property tax?” It was a tax imposed on one’s personal possessions—jewelry, furniture, automobiles, boats, etc. Every year my parents had to fill out a form they received in the mail and report their personal property. If I’m not mistaken it included bank accounts. I remember one year an auditor came to our house and went through the whole house looking for taxable personal property. He checked the form my parents submitted to the taxing authority against what he saw with his eyes. He took pictures. He stayed a long time and then left. I asked my parents what that was all about. (I think I was probably about eight years old.) They explained to me that the taxing authority (let’s say the state from here on) did not believe that they possessed so little of any worth. They sent the auditor out to see if he could discover that my parents were hiding something from the state. As it turned out, they weren’t. We were poor. But we lived in a neighborhood that wasn’t classified as poor, so the state didn’t believe my parents had so few possessions—without looking for themselves. Perhaps most neighbors had legacy jewelry or at least one expensive piece of furniture or one expensive television set. We had none of that.

I doubt that my parents ever had to pay that tax to the state. Maybe they did; I don’t remember. But think about that “personal property tax.” Imagine someone losing their job and having to pay an annual tax on their furniture! No, I kid you not. That happened. And people sometimes lost their furniture, cars, heirloom jewelry, etc., because they lost their jobs due to economic recession or illness or whatever. Finally, I don’t remember when, that state dropped that tax. It was recognized as regressive—meaning it was harmful to the poor and to those who became unemployed through no fault of their own. It was especially harmful, unfair, to widows and retired people.

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

However, that state still has a real estate property tax. But that, too, is regressive for the same reasons and ought to be abolished. Illustration: A man making one hundred thousand dollars a year suddenly dies in his early fifties. Not that unusual. (Many more men than women die suddenly of classical heart attacks at relatively early ages in spite of what some health organizations want you to think. But that’s a subject for another blog post.) His widow, who has not worked since they married twenty-five years earlier, is suddenly faced with paying a hefty real property tax on their house. She can’t make it. She has to sell the house—only because her husband died. This is regressive and unfair.

Please don’t tell me sales tax is fair. It isn’t—unless it is imposed only on luxury items—as it once was! When I was a kid growing up in that city and state there was no sales tax on most items such as clothing and groceries. The only “sales tax” was an “added value tax” or “luxury tax.” You paid such on a car (because there was a good public transportation system) and on a boat (because it is absolutely unnecessary). Some states, counties and cities now do not impose sales tax on groceries.

I happen to live in a state now that has no income tax. Of course I enjoy not paying income tax, but I still think it should be instituted to replace property tax. Why? Because income tax is the only tax based solely on ability to pay it.

Let’s imagine a hypothetical “original situation” (John Rawls) in which people are tasked with deciding on what kind of tax they will have to pay. In this original situation they do not yet know (“veil of ignorance”) their own economic advantages or disadvantages. All they know is that there will be advantaged and disadvantaged people. They know everything about real life except what their place in it will be. Their only task is to decide, under this “veil of ignorance” what kind of taxes they want their governments to impose. They know taxation will be necessary. What kind of tax would they decide to have to pay?

I propose they would decide to have to pay only income tax—knowing that once the veil of ignorance is lifted and they are no longer in this original situation but living in the real world they might lose their job, lose their spouse, become ill, etc. They will realize that an income tax is the only tax that is based solely on ability to pay and choose that as the only tax. (Yes, they might decide to tax sales of luxuries, but I’m not sure about that yet. They might also decide to tax monetary legacies—inherited money. But I consider that under the general umbrella concept of income tax.)

Some people always respond to me by arguing for a so-called “consumption tax.” That is, a large tax on sales. I have studied these proposals and am convinced that, under the veil of ignorance, in the original situation, nobody would opt for that. It would ruin the economy and benefit the rich. The rich would find ways to buy and enjoy their luxuries without paying tax on them. (For example by buying and owning their luxuries in the Cayman Islands and spending much of their time there.) Middle income people would suffer the most as they would have to pay about thirty-three percent on most things they buy. People would avoid buying things. The economy would collapse. (Don’t even propose such a consumption tax as I have studied it a lot and am convinced it is not a viable option; I do not know of any place in the world that has it as the only form of taxation.)

Right now, in the state where I live, individuals pay taxes on real property (land, buildings, minerals in the ground) and on purchases—except exempt groceries. One weekend every year the taxing authorities (state, county, school district, city) generously offer a “tax holiday” on school supplies and clothes. There is no income tax. My proposal is to replace all taxes with income tax because income tax is the only tax based solely on ability to pay it. And because income tax is the only tax people in the original situation under the veil of ignorance would select out of all tax options.

Now, I also believe people in the original situation under the veil of ignorance would opt for a highly graduated income tax—local, state and national. The rich would pay a higher percentage of their income than the working poor or middle class because they get more services from the government. No matter what anyone says, that’s always how it turns out. Also, the higher taxes paid by the rich (percentage wise) would be used to benefit the poor through job training, jobs, education, and health care especially for children. Yes, redistribution of wealth but not through cash handouts. Why? Because this is what all people in the original condition under the veil of ignorance would want. It’s rational and therefore fair.

Back to the personal property tax I wrote about at the beginning. It was finally abolished because legislators became convinced it was unfair to people who lost their incomes. The same unfairness applies to all property tax. My proposal is not to add income tax to property tax but to replace the latter with the former. I would also prefer to abolish sales tax except on luxury items.

*Note to commenters: I will not approve comments that are hostile or off topic. This blog is for rational discussion of the subject. It is not a discussion board. It is like an editorial page. Comments posted her are like letters to the editor. There is no guarantee that they will be published. Like the editor of the opinion page of a newspaper I make selections among submitted comments.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 25, 2020

A Really Good REFORMED Systematic Theology

Next Post

August 2, 2020 Second (or Third) Thoughts about "Situation Ethics" (Part One)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian denomination is most associated with the Reformation led by Martin Luther?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Anglican Orthodox Catholic Lutheran