What If Twins in a Womb Could Think and Talk? A Parable

Last updated on: December 2, 2019 at 9:07 am by Roger E. Olson

What If Twins in a Womb Could Think and Talk? A Parable 2019-12-02T09:07:26-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I recently came across a fascinating parable in a new theology book. For years I’ve been using my own version of the parable in teaching theology but didn’t know it was already “out there.” I’m going to summarize the parable in my own words even though I don’t think it is copyrighted. The book I found it in attributes its version to Henri Nouwen but says it was his retelling of a “popular story.” If you want to read the original (in the book in which I found it) you’ll have to find pages 62-63 of Christian Dogmatics: An Introduction by Dutch theologians Cornelis van der Kooi and Gijsbert van den Brink (Eerdmans, 2017). (And thanks to Eerdmans for sending me this complimentary copy.)

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

Here is the parable in my own words. (Apparently the originator of the story is unknown and I made up my own version without depending on anyone else so far as I know.)

Twin boys were conceived and lived together in their mother’s womb for nine months. Miraculously they developed mature thought and found a way to communicate with each other. Sometime during their gestation they began to explore their condition, their situation, and why they were “there” in this place together. What did it mean? They agreed that eventually they would grow too large to fit in this space and would have to leave it. They also agreed that their being there at all, together, was a mystery. They had no idea how they got there. As they speculated about the answers to their questions they fell into disagreement. One twin said that he heard faint sounds from somewhere and that it was evidence of an “outside” to which they would eventually go. The other twin denied hearing the sounds “from outside” and chalked them up to their imaginations—a desire for there to be an outside. The first twin argued that there had to be something “bigger” than this womb because they were being sustained by a cord from somewhere. How did that happen? Where does the life-giving nutrition come from? The other twin just insisted that their sustenance and entire situation was just an accident and had no explanation such as the other twin sought. The first twin insisted that such a theory made no sense as they continued to grow and develop and their existence and development had to mean something. The skeptic twin scoffed at that and claimed there was no evidence for his twin’s belief. The first twin, the hopeful and believing one, said that the evidence was “everything” about their situation, not just one or two facts. Their whole situation made no sense unless they were meant for something by someone “bigger” perhaps in whom they were growing. The argument went on and on until one day they both heard a loud voice asking “Do you want to come out?” They both were shocked and hesitated. Then said in unison “No! We’re afraid. We like it in here.” The first twin said to his skeptical brother “This is it; here we go. It’s time. Now we are going to find out what’s ‘outside’ this place.” His skeptical brother responded “Nope. There’s nothing outside of this place. That voice was just a fantasy.” Then it happened. They both were born into the “outside” world. The first twin, the “believing one,” felt vindicated but at the same time was shocked. The outside was more than he could ever have imagined in his wildest dreams.

Eventually, soon, actually, the twins forgot about their time in the womb and their argument. But the first twin went through life believing that even this world—outside the womb—had meaning and purpose and that death would simply be the transition to a new stage of existence unimaginable in this life. The second twin went through life doubting that life has any meaning or purpose and believing that death would simply be the end of his existence. But the first twin, for reasons he wasn’t entirely sure about, became a midwife (yes, there are male midwives) and always spoke to the fetuses in mothers’ wombs, attempting to tell them what the outside world would be like and encouraging them to look forward to being born. He did this, of course, only with the mothers’ consent. Occasionally, without his knowing it, a fetus heard his voice and understood his words but could not even begin to imagine what the world outside the womb was like.

Obviously this parable has multiple layers of meaning. I have used it for many years (not knowing that anyone else had ever even though of it!) to illustrate two things. First, the “evidence” for God’s existence is like the evidence the first twin found for his and his brother’s existence and situation—everything. Second, death, even to the firm believer, is nothing to be feared but is to be thought of as a transition to a new state of existence. Heaven (or paradise), like life outside the womb, is beyond our capacity to picture. Yet we have hints of it, “sounds from outside the womb,” to return to the parable, that could be brushed off as imaginings, wishful thinking, but are not best brushed off that way. To brush them off that way is to prefer hopelessness to hope, ashes to gold, despair to confident expectation of a better “world” to come.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 29, 2019

Has Franklin Graham Gone Off the Rails?

Next Post

December 7, 2019 Guest Post Responding to My Essay about "Relational Sovereignty"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what is the correct sequence of events in the End Times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, false prophet rises from earth, mark of the beast given False prophet rises, dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, mark of the beast given Mark of the beast given, dragon cast to earth, beast rises, false prophet rises Beast rises from sea, dragon cast to earth, mark of the beast given, false prophet rises