Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

rogereolson

How Christian Institutions Of Higher Education Should Respond

Last updated on: March 14, 2019 at 4:11 pm   by Roger E. Olson

How Christian Institutions Of Higher Education Should Respond 2019-03-14T16:11:34-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

How Christian Institutiosn of Higher Education Should Respond to Faculty Members Whose Research Results Are Controversial

First of all, before attempting to answer the implied question with a proposal, I have to say that there are many kinds of Christian institutions of higher education. Here I am ONLY referring to ones that claim academic integrity and excellence. And I am ONLY referring to ones that WANT that claim to be taken seriously.

Academic integrity requires academic freedom. On the other hand, no academic institution has absolute academic freedom. There are always limits and boundaries. SOME have real tenure in which case a faculty member with tenure cannot be fired for any claims made as a result of real research in his or her discipline. (There are always other grounds for firing a tenured professor such as failing to fulfill his or her contract, criminal activity, etc. These reasons for being fired are spelled out in faculty handbooks.)

Officially confessional religious colleges, universities and seminaries are permitted by the AAUP (American Association of University Professors) to fire tenured professors who blatantly, knowingly, contradict the clearly stated confessional standards of the institution.

However, over the many years of my career in Christian higher education (three notable Christian universities and service as editor of a scholarly journal published by fifty such) I have witnessed the firing of several faculty members who did not violate their contracts or blatantly transgress the written confessional standards of their institutions. In every case I know of the firings took place because the faculty members published research conclusions considered “too controversial” for the institution and its constituency.

Such instances absolutely violate academic freedom and when they happen the institutions ought to be called out for lack of academic integrity.

The solution is to study the faculty member’s controversial conclusions in depth and then, at worst, give him or her non-teaching assignments.

Firing a tenured faculty member is a very serious violation of academic integrity and freedom. An institution that does that without valid cause (as stated above) is announcing to the world that it lacks academic integrity.

A five year contract is not tenure and the only response to an institution that calls it such is laughter and scorn. It is a farce.

So what ought a confessional Christian institution of higher learning to do when a faculty member teaches and/or publishes very controversial conclusions based on serious research? If the institution considers it a serious enough matter it should publish a statement saying it does not agree and leave it at that.

Otherwise, academic freedom is meaningless. And academic freedom is crucial to academic integrity. In fact, an institution that fires professors without good cause (such as the few mentioned above) ought to be sued and condemned by professional societies, accrediting agencies, and shunned by other Christian academics.

Some years ago a Christian college fired a professor who held a controversial opinion about God. The college hired him knowing all about his opinion and the college had long tolerated the same opinion held by a well-known faculty member. However, when some constituent pastors “raised a stink” about the newer faculty member’s published view the college fired him. In my opinion, that college proved itself unworthy of being taken seriously as an academic institution.

Another but very different case study. A few years ago a Christian college president wrote that any faculty member who had mental reservations about the college’s statement of faith ought to resign. Then a student discovered a blatant doctrinal error in the statement of faith and the president changed the statement of faith to be more orthodox.

What if a faculty member had discovered the error? Perhaps one did and was afraid to mention it. This kind of hyper-orthodoxy sends a chill over academic discovery and achievement—even when it can be helpful to an institution.

My point is that Christian institutions of higher education need to get serious about academic freedom—while acknowledging that pure, absolute, total academic freedom never exists anywhere. Firing especially tenured faculty members (or faculty members who were hired with full knowledge of their non-traditional views) undermines Christian institutions’ claims to being serious about scholarship.

*Note: As always, here I write only for myself; I do not write for anyone else. These are my own opinions, not those of any particular other person, groups or organization. If you choose to respond, be nice. Explain yourself concisely. Do not misrepresent anything I wrote. I will not approve comments that are in any way uncivil, insulting or argumentative. Keep your comment brief and to the point. Do not post a sermon or a cliche or Scripture passages (only). This is a space for serious dialogue among serious-minded Christians and those interested in serious Christian thought.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 12, 2019

What God Can, Can’t, and Won’t Do

Next Post



March 19, 2019 Christian Theology in a Post-Theological Church World


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth

Related posts from Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: The Abolition...

Roger E. Olson

Family

She Survived Her Execution. Should the State Try...

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man Part 2: Chapter 2:...

Roger E. Olson

Family

Ambiguity without Ambivalence in Faith

Roger E. Olson

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube