Is There “No Possibility” That God Exists? Thoughts about Stephen Hawking’s Final Declaration

Last updated on: February 27, 2019 at 8:40 am by Roger E. Olson

Is There “No Possibility” That God Exists? Thoughts about Stephen Hawking’s Final Declaration 2019-02-27T08:40:22-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In his last book Brief Answers to Big Questions (Bantam, 2018) physicist Stephen Hawking argued that not only is there no proof of God’s existence but that “there’s no possibility of God.” (See “Stephen Hawking’s Final Book Says There’s ‘No Possibility’ of God in Our Universe” at “Live Science” at https://www.livescience.com/63854-stephen-hawking-says-no-god.html .

According to this article, to his dying day Hawking believed science has disproven God’s existence. He believed the “big bang” explains the beginnings of the universe without any need for recourse to God or anything like God unless one simply wishes to use “God” as a cipher for the “big bang.” The big bang, Hawking believed, was a creation out of nothing and does not call for any explanation of what was before the big bang. In fact, relying on an argument from the interdependence of time and space (of the universe), there was no time before the big bang and, apparently, somehow, the big bang brought time into existence.

Finally, at the end of the first chapter of Brief Answers Hawking wrote that “We have this one life to appreciate the grand design of the universe and for that I am extremely grateful.”

A few questions naturally arise. Unfortunately, we can’t ask Hawking himself. However, I toss them out here for those who agree with him to answer if they can. (And I invite others like I am who find these claims absurd to comment.)

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

First, it is one thing to deny God’s existence and something else entirely to claim that there is no possibility of God’s existence. That latter is a metaphysical claim beyond the purview of science. Even if science could explain everything that exists and happens in the observable universe, that would not by itself prove that God does not exist.

Second, apparently Hawking, like many skeptics, believed that belief in God depends on the necessity of God to fill the “gaps” in science’s account of the nature of the universe. Theologians have long refuted that “God of the gaps” “theology.”

Third, the argument from time can work just as much against belief that the big bang was “the ultimate free lunch” (as one other scientist has labeled it), a creation out of nothing, as against belief in God. No believer in God I know believes that time, as we know it, existed in God in eternity—before the creation. And the claim that time began to exist with the big bang raises the same question theism (belief in God) raises: What was “before” that? “Nothing” doesn’t answer.

Fourth, according to German philosopher Martin Heidegger the most important and fundamental question of all questions is “Why is there something rather than nothing?” He did not think that had any answer. But any claim that the whole universe simply “came into being” raises the questions “How?” and “Why?”

On one episode of the television sitcom “The Big Bang Theory” Sheldon Cooper, who almost worships Hawking, exclaims that Hawking explained the when, the how and the why of the universe. Really? How did Hawking explain the why? of the universe? To say it simply happened goes no way toward answering the purpose or meaning of the universe—Heidegger’s questions. And science alone cannot answer that question.

Fifth, elsewhere in his book, as before, Hawking insisted that the universe is controlled by iron-clad natural laws with no “room” for interruptions or suspensions. However, he also acknowledged unpredictability on the subatomic level—without (so far as I know) suggesting that “someday” science will do away with that unpredictability. For him, as for most contemporary physicists, unpredictability is an irreducible part of the universe on the subatomic level if not on “larger” levels.

Sixth, notice Hawking’s reference to “the grand design of the universe.” Seriously? How can there be “design” in something that is without any designer? I notice this slip into theistic language among non-theistic people all the time. They personalize nature without noticing that this at least implies something transcendent to nature.

Seventh, to whom was Hawking “grateful?” “Grateful” implies an object following the implied “to.”

Eighth, and finally, people should not be tripped up by Hawking’s language about “in the universe.” Of course theists have never claimed that God “exists in the universe”—at least not like water exists in the universe. Yes, to be sure, the vast majority of theists believe God exists in the universe but also outside the universe. (Are there edges to the universe? There have to be something like that. Saying the universe is “round” would not help.) Clearly Hawking meant that there is no possibility that God exists…period.

Yes, I will go so far as to say that in this particular case (not Hawking’s science in general) the physicist stepped way beyond science into metaphysics and betrayed a bias or at least a belief that is not truly scientific.

No, I do not think science can prove God’s existence. On the other hand, I am certain that science, insofar as it sticks to its own methods and draws conclusions from them alone, cannot disprove God’s existence. And I think Hawking knew that (because he was extremely smart).

So why do I think he made that last shocking claim—that there’s no possibility of God in the universe? I can only surmise. I think it was to claim scientific support for his own quasi-religious belief in the non-existence of God. What I don’t know whether he was aware of his own error. If not, he should have been (because he was smart).

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 25, 2019

Our God Reigns (But How?)

Next Post

March 2, 2019 Should Boys and Girls Wrestle Each Other? A Case Study in Sex and Cultural Gender Confusion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what is the correct sequence of events in the End Times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, false prophet rises from earth, mark of the beast given False prophet rises, dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, mark of the beast given Mark of the beast given, dragon cast to earth, beast rises, false prophet rises Beast rises from sea, dragon cast to earth, mark of the beast given, false prophet rises