Did God the Father Really “Turn His Face Away” from Jesus?

Last updated on: June 5, 2018 at 7:00 am by Roger E. Olson

Did God the Father Really “Turn His Face Away” from Jesus? 2018-06-05T07:00:36-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A relatively new (“newish”) hymn sung in many evangelical churches says that as Jesus was dying on the cross “the Father turns his face away.” (The hymn’s title is “How Great the Father’s Love for Us.) I do not know whether the hymn’s authors were influenced by German theologian Jürgen Moltmann, but in the latter’s classic book The Crucified God he argues that this was the essential moment of Jesus’s saving work—he was literally abandoned by God the Father. His “cry of dereliction,” quoting Psalm 22, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” was not merely an expression of a subjective feeling but an expression of what was actually happening within the Trinity.

A few years ago I heard a sermon in which the preacher contradicted the idea that God the Father really turned his back on or abandoned the Son as he was dying on the cross. According to her, Jesus’s cry of dereliction was nothing more than his subjective feeling of being abandoned but God the Father was with him the whole time. (I don’t recall whether this argument was a direct response to the hymn or not and I doubt that it was a response to The Crucified God.)

Moltmann’s strong emphasis on the crucifixion of Jesus, including his death and descent into hell (what Catholic theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar calls “Holy Saturday”), created strong reactions. He was accused by many of “tritheism” for positing a break within the Trinity. Of course, Moltmann also argued that the Father suffered the death of Jesus—just in a different way than Jesus suffered it. I am certain that Moltmann would sin “How Great the Father’s Love for Us” with agreement but explain that “the Father turns his face away” includes the pain of God himself (ref. Kazoh Kitamori, Theology of the Pain of God).

Is this theme—also shared by German theologian Eberhard Jüngel—theologically correct, theologically debatable, or heresy?

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

There is a sense in which any robust doctrine of the Trinity inevitably opens the door to this literal, ontological abandonment of Jesus by God. And there is a sense in which any substitutionary atonement theory (whether “satisfaction,” “penal substitution,” or “governmental”) seems to require it.

I say “robust doctrine of the Trinity” because, of course, at least from Augustine on many Western Christian theologians have rejected any social trinitarianism in favor of a quasi-modalist view of the Trinity that emphasizes the oneness over the threeness of the Godhead.

The social doctrine of the Trinity, rooted in the teachings of the Cappadocian Fathers (Gregory, Gregory, and Basil) and emphasized by Richard of St. Victor (and his medieval followers) and resurrected in the 20th century by Leonard Hodgson and others, opens the door to “the Father turns his face away” and Moltmann’s (and others’) idea of Jesus’s literal, real, ontological abandonment by the Father.

Some Christian thinkers regard that as enough to send us all running back into the arms of Augustine and others such as (the early) Karl Barth who emphasized the unity of the Trinity—some to the point of preferring “modes of being” (Seinsweisen) to “persons” for the three hypostases of the Trinity.

But the issue goes deeper. What about the atonement? Can one believe (as Barth did, for example) in a substitutionary atonement, that somehow and in some sense Jesus bore on the cross the burden of human sin and paid the penalty for, suffered the punishment humanity deserves, how can one deny that there was some abandonment of Jesus by God the Father who cannot look upon sin with pleasure and satisfaction? Of course, this could be a reason why even many evangelical Christians are abandoning any substitutionary theory of the atonement—because they don’t want to believe God the Father really, literally, ontologically abandoned Jesus as he was dying on the cross.

And the issue goes even deeper. What about the incarnation itself? If one believes that the God-man Jesus Christ was not omniscient or omnipotent during his life on earth, but really “emptied himself” of power and glory in order to live a truly human life, then doesn’t that already imply a social Trinity? Of course, some Christians, including some philosophers and theologians, have argued that Jesus was omnipotent and omniscient during his earthly life; only his humanity was limited in power and knowledge. But that seems to resurrect the specter of Nestorianism—dividing Jesus into two persons—one human and one divine.

Of course, it’s impossible to prove one way or another whether “the Father turned [sic] his face away” and abandoned Jesus as he was dying on the cross. One stream of Christian exegesis, interpretation, and theology denies it and says Jesus’ cry of dereliction was the expression of a subjective feeling and not of ontological reality. Those in that stream tend to view any interpretation of Jesus’s death on the cross and his cry of dereliction as real abandonment by the Father as essentially tritheistic and therefore heretical. Another stream of Christian exegesis, interpretation, and theology affirms it and says Jesus’s cry of dereliction was the expression of a real abandonment as Jesus took on the sin of the world and “became sin for us.”

As for me, I have no qualm about believing that as Jesus was dying on the cross for our sins “the Father turned [sic] his face away” and Jesus was actually abandoned by God for a time in order to fully identify with us in our sinful condition and take on himself the penalty for sin in our place. Of course, I would want to emphasize immediately and also the Father’s pain and suffering (as Moltmann does in The Crucified God) in abandoning the Son.

Is this tritheism? Well, no more so than believing that in the incarnation the Son of God limited himself, divesting himself of the use of his divine attributes of power and glory (“kenosis”), in order to live a truly human life among us. The only way to escape that is to deny Luke 2 which says that Jesus grew in “stature and wisdom and favor with God and man” or to claim that was a charade or that somehow that applied only to his “human nature” which then, again, raises the specter of Nestorianism.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 1, 2018

About the Handbook of Denominations in the United States (14th Edition)

Next Post

June 8, 2018 Is the Evangelical Christianity of My Youth Gone?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the main structure of Lamentations?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Twelve genealogies Ten parables Six sermons Five acrostic poems