Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

rogereolson

What Do I Mean by the “Supernatural?”

Last updated on: February 21, 2017 at 8:41 am   by Roger E. Olson

What Do I Mean by the “Supernatural?” 2017-02-21T08:41:24-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What Do I Mean by the “Supernatural?”

sculpture-535638_640_opt

My new book The Essentials of Christian Thought mentions throughout the necessity of the dimension of the “supernatural” for Christianity. To my way of thinking, a Christianity without the supernatural is not authentic. The book is an exposition of what I call “narrative biblical metaphysics”—an attempted archaeology of the Bible’s implicit perspective on reality. I acknowledge, of course, that the Bible is not a book of philosophy or even theology; it is a narrative, a “theodrama,” a great story about God and us (humans). But the story implies a metaphysical vision of reality without stating it in the form of a philosophy. Philosopher Alfred North Whitehead famously said that while Buddhism is a metaphysic searching for a religion, Christianity is a religion searching for a metaphysic. If not he, his followers (“process theologians”) have attempted to use his process metaphysic to give Christianity what Whitehead thought was lacking.

My argument, in Essentials of Christian Thought, is that Whitehead was wrong. Yes, of course Christianity has always learned some things from pagan and secular metaphysics—to fill in the “gaps,” so to speak. But embedded within the biblical story is an implicit metaphysic that should not be replaced with another one. And that has always been a problem for Christian thought—people replacing the implicit biblical metaphysic with some version of Platonism (e.g., “middle” or “neo-“ Platonism) or Aristotelianism or Hegel’s panentheism or Whitehead’s process philosophy.

One anecdote I tell in the book comes from an experience I had about fifteen years ago. I went to hear a well-known and influential Christian minister and theologian speak. I don’t remember the advertised topic, but his talk was about “Buddhist Christianity.” He said that, as a Christian, he had found in a particular form of Japanese Buddhism what is missing in Christianity—a life and world philosophy. He articulated a blatantly syncretistic version of Christianity that I did not recognize as Christian at all. The lecture hall was filled with eager young Christian students hoping, I’m sure, to be enlightened and inspired by this “Buddhist Christian.” I was shocked and left the event dismayed.

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

One element of the “narrative biblical metaphysic” that I believe many, perhaps most modern American Christians have great difficulty with is the supernatural. In The Essentials of Christian Thought I do not shy away from it and even aver that it is essential to the Christian story and its underlying metaphysical vision of reality. I acknowledge in the book, of course, that the word “supernatural” is controversial and causes much confusion because popular culture—at least in America—has distorted and misused it to the point of making it almost useless—for Christian philosophy and theology.

Go to almost any secular bookstore and you will find a section labeled either “metaphysical” or “supernatural.” Both tend to mean “esoteric” and/or “occult.” Americans have come to identify the word “supernatural” with anything occult, esoteric, mystical and most of it has little if anything to do with Christianity. Somehow we have handed over the word “supernatural” to things like the so-called New Age Movement or perhaps some versions of Christianity that specialize in manufactured miracles (e.g., “leg lengthening” or routine “exorcisms” even of born-again Christians who struggle with some besetting sin or psychological problem).

In The Essentials of Christian Thought I define “supernatural” differently. But this is nothing new; theology almost always uses words differently than they are used in popular culture and even in churches (where popular culture has largely determined the meanings).

Here is the definition I borrow from Cambridge University philosophical theologian John Oman (d. 1939): “The Supernatural means the world which manifests more than natural values, the world which has values which stir the sense of the holy and demand to be esteemed as sacred.” Oman added that the supernatural is “the higher environment” that provokes a sense of sacredness in all people, “the holy” that grounds “All absoluteness, without which truth is mere useful information, morals mere expedient actions, beauty mere pleasing of the senses.” For Oman all this “is from the Supernatural.” (The Natural and the Supernatural, p. 71)

In my opinion, following philosophers and theologians such as Thomas Reid and Horace Bushnell but also C. S. Lewis, the “supernatural” is not over against nature but intermingled with it. It is to nature what the mind is to the brain and the will is to the physical body. These are only analogies, of course, but they point to a dimension of reality that is not reducible to the natural and the material.

With Bushnell I believe, and argue, that every act of genuine free will is supernatural insofar as it is not caused or controlled by laws of nature alone. Denial of anything supernatural—“above nature”—leads inevitably to determinism unless one simply chooses to believe in some kind of spontaneity within nature which is not the same as genuine free will. With the disappearance of genuine free will goes real responsibility and even evil itself.

None of this directly addresses the questions of a “supernatural world of spiritual beings” or miracles, but it opens the door to answering them in a certain way—as possible and even real.

In sum, then, I could say that the word “supernatural” is, at least, a necessary way of naming a reality that is “more” than the closed causal nexus of nature, “more” than what science studies, “more” than what we observe—even if we do observe its effects (which I think we do in every act of genuine responsible free will).

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment solely to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post



February 18, 2017

Does (Can) the New Testament Church ("Ekklesia") Exist Today?

Next Post



February 25, 2017 Innocent until Proven Guilty? Or Guilty until Proven Innocent?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth

Related posts from Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: The Abolition...

Roger E. Olson

Family

She Survived Her Execution. Should the State Try...

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man Part 2: Chapter 2:...

Roger E. Olson

Family

Ambiguity without Ambivalence in Faith

Roger E. Olson

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube