Is There Anything We Can Take for Granted (that All Americans Agree about)? A Challenge

Last updated on: January 31, 2017 at 9:12 am by Roger E. Olson

Is There Anything We Can Take for Granted (that All Americans Agree about)? A Challenge 2017-01-31T09:12:45-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Call it nostalgia if you wish, but I remember a time when there were at least some beliefs one could take for granted—some beliefs that one could express and expect agreement. At least in America. True, some of them were false and badly needed correction. On the other hand, I worry about a cultural condition in which no such consensus exists about anything.

One of my favorite cartoons is the always insightful “Non Sequitur.” A recent one illustrates my point pungently if sardonically. To avoid any infringement on the cartoonist’s or publisher’s copyright I will not repeat it here, but you can find it by going to: http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2017/01/30

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

My question is this: What is a culture, especially a community, in which nothing can be taken for granted except this: Whatever one says, if it goes out to a sufficiently large audience, will find serious disagreement and even contradiction?

Over my approximately six years of blogging, I have experienced the following: There is nothing I can say here that will not be contradicted by someone. A few years ago I explored this phenomenon here and asked if anyone seriously would contradict the proposition that “Two plus two equals four.” Predictably, it was contradicted—by an academic mathematician. (He did not say it is necessarily false but that “it depends”—as I recall.)

Let me be clear and specific. The philosopher David Hume (d. 1776) distinguished helpfully between two kinds of propositions: analytic and synthetic. An analytic proposition is an expression of a definition such as “All circles are round, not square.” A synthetic proposition is any that makes a truth claim beyond matters of definition—about the “world outside the dictionary.” Hume claimed there can be no synthetic propositions that are true a priori; all synthetic propositions are at best true a posteriori. This claim awakened philosopher Immanuel Kant (d. 1804) from his “dogmatic slumbers” and launched his project to discover synthetic propositions that are true a priori.

Here I am not concerned with whether there are synthetic propositions that are true a priori but only with whether there are synthetic propositions one can express in America that one can reasonably expect to find agreed to by all sane adult Americans.

Of course, I am especially interested in this question with regard to ethics—in the broadest sense possible (as opposed to, say, “garnishing” as in the “Non Sequitur” cartoon).

My challenge to you, my faithful and serious readers, is this: Think of a synthetic proposition, preferably having to do with right and wrong, that you think would not draw serious disagreement from any sane, relatively reasonable adult Americans. (By “sane” I mean not suffering from a clinical mental or emotional disability as, for example, listed and described in the DSM-V. By “relatively reasonable” I mean qualified to serve on a jury.) Please keep it to one sentence.

Footnote: If anyone wonders why I am raising this now and suspects it’s only because the “Non Sequitur” cartoon piqued my curiosity and interest, let me explain. It is not only or even especially because of that cartoon even though, I admit, the cartoon did pique my interest. This is a question that has troubled me deeply for a long time. I have lived most of my life now in American academia and much of my adult life in moderate-to-progressive religious communities. The theme of “diversity” was and continues to be an enormous one in those sectors of American life and I now see it being expressed in entertainment, journalism, politics, etc. The theme of “diversity” (e.g., multiculturalism) is good; I agree with it whole heartedly—but only up to a point. I worry that it needs to be balanced by unity. And that unity needs to be more than “We are all Americans” where “being Americans” means “embracing our diversity.” I worry that a culture and a community cannot survive on diversity and tolerance of difference alone. There needs to be an underlying consensual ethical vision that goes beyond tolerance and diversity. Otherwise, eventually, the most powerful voice(s) will win out in the public square debates about ethics (including politics). And by “powerful voice(s)” I mean those that are capable, by whatever means, of enforcing their particular ethical vision on everyone.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment solely to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 29, 2017

Are There "Wicked Problems" in Theology?

Next Post

February 3, 2017 A Great Irony: Contemporary American "Conservative" Christianity Is Really Liberal!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book comes immediately before Psalms in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Job Song of Songs Ecclesiastes Proverbs