Is Donald Trump the Antichrist?

Last updated on: June 11, 2016 at 8:00 am by Roger E. Olson

Is Donald Trump the Antichrist? 2016-06-11T08:00:17-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Okay, I got your attention. That was almost my only intention with the question that forms the title of this essay. My main intention was to raise the question of the biblical figure of the “Antichrist” and its relevance for today’s Christianity.

As with my previous blog post (about demon possession and exorcism) the concern underlying my question about the relevance of the biblical figure of the “Antichrist” for today’s Christianity is my concern about how far we—contemporary Western Christians—have surrendered important biblical categories, experiences, truths for the sake of cultural respectability.

I grew up in the 1950s and 1960s in the “thick” of American evangelical Christianity. Back then every American evangelical Christian heard about “the Antichrist”—a figure mentioned especially in the New Testament “Apocalypse” which most people know as “The Book of Revelation” (but most people refer to informally as “Revelations).

(Sidebar: I’ve gotten somewhat used to the way “church people” refer to books of the Bible, but I still cringe a bit when I hear even pastors refer to a specific Psalm as “Psalms such-and-such” and to The Book of Revelation as “Revelations.”)

Revelation describes the Antichrist quite vividly and yet there have been numerous interpretations of this apocalyptic figure throughout church history. Many biblical interpreters before Constantine (and perhaps a few after him) thought the Antichrist was either a specific Roman emperor or the “office” of Roman emperor. Luther thought the Antichrist was the pope. After him many Lutherans (and some others) interpreted the Antichrist as whoever holds the office of pope in the Roman Catholic Church. (Unless I’m mistaken some very conservative Lutheran groups in the U.S. still consider the office of pope the Antichrist.)

During the 20th century, of course, evangelical Christians in America became fascinated with attempting to identify some specific world leader as the Antichrist. Some background to that might help both contemporary evangelicals and non-evangelicals understand this mid-20th century apocalyptic fever. Throughout the 19th century and into the early 20th century most evangelical Christians were either amillennialists or postmillennialists. That is, most interpreted Revelation as purely symbolic or as referring to events patterns of events in history and the eventual triumph of Christ over evil through his church. Then came a new wave of premillennialism (or “chiliasm” as it was sometimes called especially by scholars). There is no doubt that some of the church fathers such as Irenaeus and Tertullian were premillennialists. That is, they believed that at least parts of Revelation referred to a messianic rule and reign of Christ on earth after his bodily return in glory (the “parousia”).

Premillennialism was adopted by some late 19th century American revivalists such as D. L. Moody. Many early 20th century American fundamentalists adopted a specific form of premillennialism known as “dispensationalism.” I don’t have time or space to explain all the “ins and outs” of “dispensational premillennialism” here. I will just say (leaving much of that eschatological theory aside) that dispensational premillennialists—under the influence of John Nelson Darby and his many followers (Darby was the British founder of the Plymouth Brethren movement) such as Clarence Larkin and C. I. Scofield—interpreted Revelation and other apocalyptic portions of the Bible as literally as possible. And they especially emphasized, contrary to postmillennialists, that human history is moving “downward” toward a “Great Tribulation” lasting seven years during which an “Antichrist”—a real person—would rise to world dominance and eventually demand worship of himself on pain of death. Anyone who did worship him would have to accept “the mark of the Beast” (mentioned in Revelation) and become his minion and eventually suffer the wrath of God when God would intervene to defeat the Antichrist and his minions at the “Battle of Armageddon.”

According to this theory (viz., dispensational premillennialism) the apocalyptic “end times” would begin with a “secret rapture” (here the word “rapture” has nothing to do with ecstasy but with an older meaning of the word “being taken up”) in which gentile Christians would be removed from the world in a way invisible to non-Christians. In other words, the whole “true church” of Jesus Christ throughout the world would disappear. (In recent years fundamentalist writer Tim LaHaye has popularized this theory for the masses, but he was just recycling a well-known eschatology going back to John Nelson Darby.) So, according to this particular eschatology (not all premillennialists accept it as part of their view of the end times), throughout the Great Tribulation—which will last seven years—the true people of God, mostly gentile Christians—will be absent from the world. During it “the Antichrist” will take over the world (or much of it), persecute people who “turn to God” and the Jews and introduce a reign of terror on the world such as has never been seen before.

(Sidebar: Many dispensationalists believed/believe that immediately or shortly after “the rapture” many people will put two and two together, realize what happened, and accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. These former “hangers on” of Christianity will then face a decision: either give up their faith in Christ, go into hiding somewhere, or die a martyr’s death at the hands of the Antichrist and his minions. Many dispensational books and movies in the middle of the 20th century depicted this in some detail as an evangelistic tool. One such movie was “Thief in the Night” produced in the early 1970s and based on an extremely popular book of dispensationalism entitled The Late, Great Planet Earth.)

Dispensational premillennialists interpreted the Antichrist as a specific, real person and, throughout much of the middle of the 20th century a favorite “game” (although many took it very seriously) was attempting to pre-identify the Antichrist among world leaders. Major candidates during my early years in the “thick of American evangelicalism” were Anwar Sadat and Henry Kissinger. (Don’t ask why.)

How well I remember being part of this apocalyptic fever fueled by dispensationalism. In fact, I grew up thinking any other interpretation of Revelation was heresy. A true mark of true Christianity was fervent belief in the “rapture,” the Great Tribulation, the Antichrist and the earthly “millennial reign” after Christ’s visible return to earth. A main reason given me by my spiritual mentors for not attending movies in movie theaters was that if the rapture happened and you were there you would be “left behind” to suffer at the “hands” of the Antichrist.

I shook off dispensationalism and “rapture fever”—even belief in a “secret rapture”—while attending a very conservative Bible college. And while attending a broadly evangelical seminary I adopted “historic premillennialism” as taught by the great evangelical New Testament scholar George Eldon Ladd. Now I tend to interpret premillennial theology through the writings of Jürgen Moltmann.

Now, back to the figure of the Antichrist and the question with which I began: Why do we not hear anything about the Antichrist—either as a symbolic figure appearing throughout church history or as a literal individual person? This is, of course, part of my larger question that I raise here often: What has happened to American evangelicalism? There’s no getting away from the fact that the Antichrist is mentioned quite prominently in the New Testament—whether specifically by that title or more obliquely with some other title (e.g., “the Beast”).

Now, I’m not talking here to theological “preterists”—mostly Reformed evangelicals who believe that biblical apocalyptic literature refers to events fulfilled and completed in the ancient world. They typically interpret the biblical references to the Antichrist as referring to Roman emperors—especially Titus who destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple there in 70 A.D. (before becoming emperor). My thesis is, however, that most American evangelicals are not preterists.

What am I getting at? To put it bluntly, it seems to me that moderate American evangelicals have over reacted to the “eschatological fever” of the mid- to late-20th century to the point of thinning Christianity out to ethics: “Live for Jesus today; be a godly person; love God and others” and that’s it. While I do not want to go back into that American evangelical form of life obsessed with identifying the Antichrist, neither do I think it’s helpful to throw the baby of biblical teachings, however, difficult to interpret, out with the bathwater of fanaticism and extremism. I fear that is our tendency. Contemporary American evangelical Christianity is tending to reduce Christianity to ethics.

When I was growing up, sermons and teachings about the end times always ended with something like “In light of these things, how should we then live?” There was a lot of nonsense mixed into those sermons and teachings (to say nothing of the dispensational books on which they were based), but eschatology, however, wrongly interpreted in the details, was seen as important as a catalyst for “living today in the light of that future.” So we did emphasize ethics and saw it as inextricably tied to biblical themes that were not themselves specifically about ethics.

I have seen a very severe “thinning out” of evangelical Christianity in America during my lifetime. The one thing I can say about the fundamentalism of my spiritual upbringing is that at least is was thick; it had body, substance, weight. So much evangelical Christianity today is extremely light and amounts to little more than asking “What would Jesus do?” and “Love God and love others.” As true and good as that question and that ethical imperative are, I’m not sure we need a whole Bible or even a whole New Testament for them.

To push even further…. We American evangelicals decry Thomas Jefferson for taking a scissors (figuratively speaking) and cutting out of the New Testament (he didn’t even bother with the Old Testament) everything he considered supernatural and irrational. What was left was mostly Jesus’s ethical teachings. We call it “The Jefferson Bible.” But do we not do much the same without scissors? We leave aside in our preaching, teaching and worship whatever we sense would be opaque or offensive to the kind of people we want in our churches.

So here is how I would answer the question “Is Donald Trump the Antichrist?” (which I happen to think is at least worth asking): No, probably not. But we Christians should be serious about attempting to read the signs of the times—as the New Testament commands—and understand world events in light of revelation. The biblical figure of the Antichrist is probably a symbol of every evil “power and principality” that opposes the spirit of Christ which is love, compassion for others, and holiness of life. But the Antichrist is probably also a world leader to come who will oppress the world and persecute God’s people. But we are not given enough information in the Bible to identify who he is until he does several specific things including 1) take over much of the world, 2) blaspheme against God, 3) demand worship of himself, and 4) attempt to wipe out God’s people—Jews and gentiles. Those of us familiar with our Bible and paying attention to the signs of the times will know him when he appears. In the meantime our task is to move away from endorsing anyone or anything that is of the “spirit of the Antichrist”—anyone and anything that opposes with power compassion, love, peace and true worship of God. There have been many “little antichrists” in history and there are some alive and exercising power now, but “the Antichrist” is still to come or be identified as such. Let’s keep him in mind without being obsessed with pre-identifying him with some specific person and let’s prophetically denounce the many “little antichrists” in the world whoever they may be.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 9, 2016

Should Western Christians Rediscover Exorcism?

Next Post

June 16, 2016 Is American Society Descending into "Anomie?"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth