Is American Society Descending into “Anomie?”

Last updated on: June 16, 2016 at 7:16 am by Roger E. Olson

Is American Society Descending into “Anomie?” 2016-06-16T07:16:07-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I learned a new term while studying theology in Germany years ago: “anomie.” Wolfhart Pannenberg liked to use it to describe a social and cultural condition of loss of meaning. Technically it means “no law,” but Pannenberg and others used it for a broader social condition.

According to Pannenberg, and I agree with him, transcendence is necessary for healthy community; a society that loses its sense of transcendence eventually descends into either anomie or tyranny. Anomie was the cause of Germans’ embrace of Hitler in the early 1930s. Of course there were other factors such as fear of communism, but, according to some historians, Germany was “set up” for the rise of National Socialism by its cultural of anomie—loss of meaning—during the 1920s in the aftermath of World War 1.

What characterizes anomie? It is a cultural condition evidenced by a loss of any consensus about calling, purpose, transcending sheer individualism or nationalism. In anomie a society simply limps along by not believing together in anything—other than individual self-fulfillment.

It seems to me that the only value all Americans (or almost all Americans) hold in common in this second decade of the twenty-first century is “freedom.” We hear it all the time. It seems to be the only common thread tying American culture together. But, of course, the question then arises whether “freedom” alone—understood as lack of constraint—can serve as a cultural and social force binding diverse people together in community. I doubt it.

Sometime in the 1960s, it seems to me, America lost its unifying ethos. Before then we had a general, overriding sense of purpose other than individual liberty to self-actualize and indulge in whatever gives pleasure. Tolerance of individual “lifestyles” became the highest value; “Be true to yourself” became the overriding motto in culture.

Paul Tillich labeled such a state of culture as “autonomy”—the opposite of “heteronomy.” In reaction to the perceived heteronomy of 1950s “patriarchy” and “conformity to tradition,” the “sixties revolution” went to the opposite extreme. In spite of divided opposition, this emphasis on individualism, hedonism, tolerance of all lifestyles rolled on in popular culture. All calls for a unified sense of higher purpose that might limit individual freedom to self-actualize in whatever way people wanted were condemned as intolerant. Bare “communitarianism” was largely ignored or scorned as a call for return to the much despised “1950s” when God, country and family were higher values than individual self-actualization.

Who can read the newspaper or watch television or scan the magazine covers in stores and fail to see the emphasis on sexual gratification, materialism, violence and struggle between competing special interest groups? What holds us together as a people? We have no common heroes worthy of honor and respect; we revel in guns, sex, fashion, mindless entertainment, and celebration of celebrities who have done nothing truly admirable.

Our culture celebrates youth and beauty over wisdom and humanitarianism; we honor and envy the rich, powerful and mean. Our public “talk” is mostly arguing and bickering. We hate our government and its leaders; we defend the “rights” of those among us who flaunt their decadence. Everywhere we turn we see evidences of anti-social behavior: littering, noise pollution, mean-spirited slogans, “in your face” attitudes. Good manners are considered “old school.”

No, the 1950s was no utopia, there was much oppression and intolerance; liberation from those was a great achievement of the 1960s and beyond. But with that achievement came a loss of values higher than individual freedom from constraint and tolerance of virtually everything that we had considered mean and low and decadent and corrupt and anti-social.

Who can seriously deny that our American culture has become “coarse?” “Coarse” as in rough, angular, edgy, hostile, sensual, and hard? Where are the “tools of conviviality” that we share to smooth the way into friendships and neighborliness?

What underlies this cultural condition of coarseness? Ultimately it has to be a loss of community and what accounts for that? I believe it is the idolatry of individualism and tolerance of every lifestyle choice including anti-social ones. What underlies that? The loss of any common meaning and purpose. What is the result? Anomie. “If it isn’t illegal, do it.” And “If it feeds your individual fulfillment and self-actualization, it shouldn’t be illegal.”

A society cannot survive on such radical individualism and libertarianism. We are descending into utter cultural decadence, decay through loss of community values higher than “Feels so right it can’t be wrong” (a phrase from the theme song of the wildly popular television series “Happy Days”).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 11, 2016

Is Donald Trump the Antichrist?

Next Post

June 19, 2016 Am I "Neo-Orthodox?"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who led the Israelites into the Promised Land?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aaron Joshua Moses Caleb