A Rare “Television” Entertainment Series about Religion: “The Path”

Last updated on: May 13, 2016 at 7:13 am by Roger E. Olson

A Rare “Television” Entertainment Series about Religion: “The Path” 2016-05-13T07:13:08-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Rare “Television” Entertainment Series about Religion: “The Path” (On Hulu)

I subscribed to the internet-based streaming service Hulu to watch the mini-series based on my favorite Stephen King book 11-22-63 which is about a man who travels into the past to stop the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. I loved the book; I hated the mini-series. But I stuck with it to the bitter end in spite of so many plot changes from the book. One thing that intrigued me about the book was the town the main character settled in—“Jody, Texas.” By piecing together numerous references to its distance from Dallas and Fort Worth (where the character also lived while he waited to foil the assassination) I discerned that it was probably based on a real town in central Texas and possibly even the town where I live. The movie, however, moved it closer to the “Metroplex” (DFW area). So I still don’t know what town, if any, it is based on in the book. But it was fun to try to guess.

Then, in the middle of the series, Hulu began promoting its coming attraction—a mini-series called “The Path” about a small, alternative religious movement many outsiders call a “cult” much to its adherents’ consternation. I could tell from the trailer and teasers that some writer for the series had done his or her homework and invented a realistic New Age-style alternative religion. I was mostly interested in trying to figure out what religion(s) “Meyerism” is based on. As it turns out, after watching about eight episodes and reading interviews with some of the actors, Meyerism is an invented, eclectic religion. The show’s writers threw everything into it but the proverbial kitchen sink: meditation, an impersonal supreme reality (“the Light”), apocalyptic fear (of “the Future”), shunning of close relationships with outsiders, a charismatic leader and a struggle for leadership and control of the group, a spiritual technique (“climbing the ladder”), various kinds of mind control including severe punishments for dissenters and ex-members, etc. They have even thrown in something like biofeedback as a spiritual technique.

Obviously the show’s creators have done a lot of homework studying alternative religions, “cults,” and religious psychology. Now and then I recognize some aspect of Meyerism, a belief or practice, as so close to that of a real alternative religion that it can’t be a coincidence. Some of them, including some incidents such as a standoff with law enforcement, are clichéd.

For me, someone who has spent years studying alternative religious movements in America, the show is fascinating—a study in how a passionate religious movement could simply be invented and sane, intelligent, normal people be drawn into it. In the most recent episodes (which become available every Wednesday on Hulu) it becomes clear that Meyerism is indeed an invented religion; a person very close to the founder admits it and suffers the consequences—from a second rung leader who simply wants to lead the movement because he is a narcissist. The main character of the show, or one of two or three, has come to suspect the same, as has his son. But he and his son struggle with whether to leave the movement, which would mean being cut off from all contact with their wife and mother, and daughter and sister (and extended family) or convince themselves to live in a lie. On the other hand…unsurprisingly, this invented religion, the movement based on it, does much good for many people.

I keep trying to decide about the writers’ intentions. Is this just entertainment? I don’t think so. Is it also commentary on human nature/psychology and religion, especially cult-like religion? I think it must be. Is it an attempted retrospective explanation of the cult events of the 1970s through the 1990s in America: The People’s Temple, the Koreshite Branch Davidians, Solar Temple, etc.? I have heard one explicit reference to “Waco”—uttered by a leading member of the Meyerist compound when law enforcement besieged it. Is it a cautionary tale about power and desperate people giving their lives over to total control by a religious leader? Or is it all that and more?

One thing the series clearly does, whether intentionally or not*,* is normalize members of cults; it shows most of them as ordinary human beings, not monsters or robots or crazy people. They are victims, in some sense, whether they realize it or not, but they are relatively normal people who, searching for a higher meaning and purpose, joined an intense and high demand religious group to find it. In the process, they gradually permitted themselves to be manipulated into submission to a narcissistic control freak who himself is both a victim and victimizer.

I have to applaud the creators of the show for their diligence in at least attempting a realistic portrayal of an invented religious movement. I have had close encounters with several of them myself. And, as I have suggested here before, I believe I was on the “inside” of a cult-like religious organization (a college) for four years. I taught college-level courses on cults and new, alternative religions in America for seventeen years. I conducted original research on one when almost no one else did. And I wrote a chapter about it in a university press-published edited volume on American’s cults and new religions. It was a fascinating journey. I interviewed several ordinary members as well as one of the top leaders and found the ordinary members to be normal people with extremely unusual beliefs and practices that I discerned were, in my opinion, simply invented by the founder in the 1960s.

I do not recommend “The Path” to children or even teens or to people who are easily upset or offended by scenes of violence and explicit sexuality. And I actually don’t recommend it to people for their sheer entertainment. It may be entertaining to some people, but that is not its main value for me. It is a study in human nature, the human condition, American religious entrepreneurship, “toxic religion,” spiritual abuse, gullibility, abuse of power, and the power of self-delusion and the danger of delivering control of one’s life to a narcissist who isn’t obviously one.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 11, 2016

A Question for Christian Supporters of U.S.A. Presidential Candidate Donald Trump

Next Post

May 15, 2016 A Pentecost Sermon: The Holy Spirit...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what is the correct sequence of events in the End Times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, false prophet rises from earth, mark of the beast given False prophet rises, dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, mark of the beast given Mark of the beast given, dragon cast to earth, beast rises, false prophet rises Beast rises from sea, dragon cast to earth, mark of the beast given, false prophet rises