What Was All That Fuss About? A Late Review of “Wild at Heart” by John Eldredge

Last updated on: December 14, 2015 at 8:59 pm by Roger E. Olson

What Was All That Fuss About? A Late Review of “Wild at Heart” by John Eldredge 2015-12-14T20:59:35-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What Was All That Fuss About? A Late Review of Wild at Heart by John Eldredge

Over the years of this blog several commenters have asked my opinion about the book Wild at Heart: Discovering the Secret of a Man’s Soul (Thomas Nelson, 2001) by John Eldredge. They asked because of my interest in the “decline of men” and the “wounded male psyche.” Recently here I interacted with the book Malestrom: Manhood Swept into the Currents of a Changing World (Zondervan, 2015). Again, some commenters asked what I thought about Eldredge’s book. I had to admit I never read it.

I vaguely remember the controversy over Wild at Heart when it was first published. I read reviews of it in some Christian magazines and heard that many women’s advocates, both Christian and non-Christian, both male and female, absolutely hated it. Somehow I formed the opinion that, at least in that book, Eldredge was promoting some kind of Christian form of machismo. So, having no interest in that, I avoided the book. But because here I have frequently talked about the growing social neglect of, if not outright prejudice against, males—especially in education and health—people keep asking for my response to Wild at Heart.

I assume what really provokes those questions is my cautious but increasingly insistent opinion that maleness and femaleness, though equal in value and rights, equally sharing God’s image, are different in more ways than biology and contemporary sociology say. As I have explained here before, based on my own life experiences and observations, and informed by Scripture, I believe masculinity and femininity are not reducible to physiology or social conditioning alone. Both can be and often are very seriously distorted by social conditioning and sin and, at least in the case of males, hormones can distort gender—from what is ideal and intended. (I believe, and this is based also on reading scientific literature [“socioendocrinology”] that “testosterone poisoning” is real even if not automatic. (That is, not all males suffer from it; some do—in which case others often suffer from their acting out based on too much testosterone or their inability to control the impulses testosterone gives them.)

Here I don’t want to repeat all that or go over that territory again; it’s been almost run into the ground here (and elsewhere). What I mean by that is that opinions seemed largely “locked down.” No amount of discussion or argument will change them.

My immediate concern here is with John Eldredge’s message in Wild at Heart. (It’s the only book by him I’ve read and I have not listened to any of his podcasts.)

A few weeks ago I happened to see a used copy of Wild at Heart in the world’s largest Half Price Bookstore. (For those interested who might live near it or find themselves near it at some time—it’s the “mother store” of the chain and is in Dallas, Texas just east of Highway 75 on Northwest Highway—a few miles north of downtown Dallas. It’s the largest bookstore I’ve ever seen!) I decided it was time to read the book for myself and see what all the fuss was about and why so many people ask for my opinion about it.

Having finished the book now, I honestly do not understand what all the fuss was about—unless readers firmly believe there is no such thing (or anything good) about masculinity. Eldredge believes there is; it is hard wired into males—by God. It is the way God intended males to be in the world. It cannot be reduced to social conditioning or biology alone (contrary to what I here called “contemporary sociological orthodoxy). However, by no means does Eldredge promote anything approximating machismo or even patriarchy. Nowhere in the book does he promote male domination of women or of other men. His overall message is that males are intended to find their center in God in submission to him as their true Father and that the “father wound” many men suffer—being emasculated rather than mentored into true, positive manhood by their fathers—can find healing in relationship to God who loves and honors them as men.

Nowhere in the book does Eldredge blame women for the “damaged male psyche” many men suffer. Nowhere does he attack feminism or the liberation of women or even hint at patriarchy or “complementarianism” as that is explained and defended by many fundamentalists. If Eldredge blames anyone for the damaged male psyche many men suffer, a feeling of worthlessness that causes them to “put on” a “false self,” it is mostly fathers. Not all fathers, of course, but the onus lies there. Too many fathers, Eldredge claims, fail their sons (and often their daughters as well) by never mentoring them into true manhood which means channeling their natural adventure-seeking constructively and positively. Too many fathers also fail to bless their sons—affirming their essential goodness—something young males need from their fathers or at least some father substitute.

Eldredge does lay some blame at society’s doorstep for increasingly emasculating young males by teaching them that their natural desires for physical activity, risk and adventure are bad and that they should be more like young women in terms of natural ability to sit still longer, listen more attentively, be calm and not take risks.

Nowhere does Eldredge advocate males, boys or men, fighting (unless they are first attacked), dominating, acting out aggressively toward others, or creating or using hierarchies to gain power over others. What he does advocate (in Wild at Heart) is boys and men valuing their maleness including their natural, God-given desire for adventure and taking off the “false self” they have created to hide their wounded psyches which are usually the result of emasculation by someone.

Of course, Eldredge makes many points in the book, but nowhere did I read him advocating any kind of disposition, attitude or behavior that would in any way harm or injure or demean others—women included. His harshest criticism is aimed at men—fathers and father figures who fail to initiate boys and young men into true manhood which uses natural, inborn aggressiveness in creative and positive ways. His strongest criticisms are aimed at fathers and father figures who emasculate boys and young men by sending them messages that they naturally interpret as meaning they can never measure up to expectations.

Actually, on a very personal level, I could resonate with much of Eldredge’s message. My own father, a Pentecostal minister, was absent from my life much of the time. And I don’t mean just physically absent; even when he was physically “there” he was emotionally absent. I never heard him say “I’m proud of you son,” or “I love you, son” or anything like that. He did not seem happy to be with me; his mind was “somewhere else” even when he was with me. I can remember many instances when I had to beg him to attend some school event where I would be involved—a sports event, a play, a class trip, whatever. I intentionally attended seminary in the town where his church—my home church—was located so that I could be his assistant pastor. I hoped it would be a time of being mentored—finally—by my father. Instead, it destroyed our relationship. I won’t go into the details here, of course, but, once again, as before when I was a child and teenager, he utterly, totally failed to bless me in any way. Instead, he continually gave me insignificant tasks that he did not want to do himself. He never “gave me the pulpit” unless he had to be out of town. He never pointed out my strengths or showed me how to do anything of importance better; he only criticized me and took away my authority. In the end, he asked me to resign as his assistant pastor when I inadvertently discovered his long-standing secret life that involved gross immorality and criminal activity. After I bailed him out of jail and reluctantly agreed to keep his secrets (something I should not have done, but I was only twenty-five and very much under his control) he said “I don’t think you can work with me now that you know what you know about me.” It was the most devastating thing that ever happened to me and meant the total ruin of our father-son relationship which was on the ropes anyway. Years later, when I finally found the courage to confront him and get him to leave behind his secret life, he said “If you tell anyone what you know about me it will ruin many lives and that will be your fault and not mine.” Again, devastating to hear from one’s father who is also a highly respected and influential minister.

I actually found myself weeping at times as I read Wild at Heart; it certainly “hit home” for me. And it is the diagnosis and prescription—to find your center in God and learn your value from him—that both I and many men I know need to hear and heed.

Totally coincidentally, at the same time I have been reading Wild at Heart—off and on over a few weeks time—my wife and I have begun watching the television drama series “Madam Secretary”—on Netflix from the beginning. I was a big fan of “West Wing” and I find “Madam Secretary” much like it. (My only criticism of the series is that the main character and her family are portrayed as too perfect. No family is that non-dysfunctional! Well, okay, on second thought, I have one more criticism. Overall and in general the female characters are portrayed as sometimes misguided and flawed but always having good intentions. The male characters almost all—“Madam Secretary’s” husband the one main exception—are portrayed as sinister, not to be trusted.)

My point in mentioning “Madam Secretary” is that, at least there, if few other dramas, I have found my television portrayal of a truly good father—Henry McCord played by Tim Daly. Henry is the Secretary of State’s husband, father to their three children, professor of theology at Georgetown University, and secret agent (on the side and only occasionally) for the NSA. I love Henry’s portrayed relationship with his wife and children—especially his teenage son Jason. Henry is portrayed as “the perfect husband and father.” A little unrealistic, of course, but still refreshing after all the bad fathers in popular entertainment. He’s a true “man’s man,” loving adventure (often lived vicariously through his wife), supporting his powerful wife and sometimes quarrelsome children, and mentoring his son into positive, creative, sensitive but not emasculated manhood.

Over my lifetime I have found many male mentors, substitute fathers, if you will, who have mentored me and I have tried my best (with many mistakes, I’m sure) to be a good father, grandfather, and mentor to especially young men. Many of them have said to me what I never heard from my own father: “I’m proud of you.” And I make a point of saying that to the young men I mentor. It’s what every boy and young man needs desperately to hear from an older man and especially one mentoring him.

All that is not to say I agree with everything Eldredge wrote in Wild at Heart, but I do believe its basic message: that males are hard wired to seek adventure and desperately need a father or father-figure to mentor them into positive, creative, constructive modes of adventure-seeking. And that, when that fails, when they are emasculated and tempted to put on a “false self” to feel good about themselves, men need to re-discover God as their true, loving, affirming heavenly Father and leave behind the false self and the empty center at the core of their being created by the “father wound.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 12, 2015

Some Thoughts about Islam and the Current Controversy in U.S. Politics

Next Post

December 16, 2015 Denomination of the Week: Brethren in Christ Church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group refers to their leaders as "General Superintendents"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Catholic Nazarene Orthodox Methodist