Discussion of “Malestrom” by Carolyn Custis James (Part Four)

Last updated on: August 26, 2015 at 9:13 am by Roger E. Olson

Discussion of “Malestrom” by Carolyn Custis James (Part Four) 2015-08-26T09:13:50-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Discussion of Malestrom by Carolyn Custis James (Part Four)

Here I will be responding to Chapters 4 and 5 of Malestrom: “The Rise of Women” and “The Power of Power” respectively. Some of what I say here may not make sense unless you have read the chapters and my previous responses to Malestrom in parts one through three (Introduction through chapter three).

Again, I find myself in general hearty agreement with James. In Chapter 4 she skillfully examines the Old Testament story of Deborah and Barak and demonstrates how it is often misinterpreted—especially by conservative evangelical complementarians. She treats it as a biblical example of a “rise of women” (or at least of this woman—Deborah) as God’s will. Nothing in the story even hints that Deborah should not have been a prophet or a warrior or that God only called and relied on her “to the shame of men” who “should have” stepped up to take those roles but did not. She’s responding to the kind of nonsense I heard in a sermon about a year ago. I blogged about it. I visited a large church and heard a conservative evangelical pastor preach this story of Deborah and Barak and tell his congregation that Deborah should not have been a leader and that her leadership was only because Barak (and perhaps other men) refused to take leadership. Nothing in the story even hints at that—as James correctly and powerfully points out.

James begins Chapter 4 with stories and statistics about the current “rise of women” in cultures around the world. As a husband and father of two daughters and grandfather of a granddaughter I applaud the rise of women. The only point where I diverge from James is (so it seems to me) that I see the situation as becoming unbalanced. The rise of women is resulting in the decline of boys and young men. There’s a line in the great Clint Eastwood movie “Gran Torino” where an Asian immigrant young woman tells the Eastwood character that in her community there’s a saying: “The girls go to college; the boys go to prison.” Indeed. As I have pointed out here before, help offered to boys and girls should not be viewed as a zero sum game. But it often is so viewed. Whenever I advocate for more attention to boys’ needs in schools, for example, I am accused of advocating neglect of girls. Not at all. That’s zero sum game thinking. I would like to see James and others like her acknowledge that there is a growing problem with boys and men “dropping out” (of school and society in general) and more resources need to be devoted to helping them stay in school and even flourish there. I recently had a conversation with a university professor who told me that he knew for a fact that one of the major reasons for boys/young men dropping out of college/university is addiction to computer games. I have never seen a program designed to counter that. There are numerous programs in American schools of all levels designed to help girls and young women students. There are very few, if any, designed specifically to help boys and young men students. The general attitude is that boys and young men just need to “man up” and if they aren’t succeeding as well as girls and young women it’s their own fault.

The rise of women doesn’t bother me; I’m all for it and I want to see it continue to the point where power and advantage and privilege is equal between the sexes—around the world. I would love to see a woman be president of the United States (which should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any particular candidate). In fact, everything else being equal, I would vote for a woman over a man—just to promote the rise of women in leadership in American government and in politics. What bothers me is the decline of boys and young men and the lack of concern about it on the part of those who could help them.

Chapter 5 (“The Power of Power”) is a deconstruction of traditional interpretations of the Old Testament story of Ruth and Boaz. James holds up Boaz as a great example for men. I agree; he is. He bucks the patriarchal culture and breaks the rules in order to help Ruth and Naomi. The only problem I have with this chapter is James’ seeming view that Boaz is a great exception among men; that most men are corrupted by power and influence. She begins the chapter with a story from her own life where she was in a situation of desperate need of emergency help and, surprise of surprises (!), several men came to her aid selflessly and did not abuse her—as she feared. The overall impression one gets from this chapter is that the male norm is exercising bad power and abusing women. “It is through his encounters with Ruth that he [Boaz] becomes a masculine exemplar of the kind of creative, flourishing, multiplying power of the gospel that the world so desperately needs.” (122) Really? Are we to assume that apart from his encounter with Ruth Boaz was a bad example of masculinity? Is it that “Behind every good man stands a better woman?” Do women get all the credit for good men? Are no men already good? What if the story implies that Ruth encountered a good man in Boaz?

Earlier in the chapter James says this about boys (and by extension men in general): “Young boys are socialized to adopt a ‘dominant, aggressive, controlling, and sexualized version of masculinity.’ In extreme cases, this kind of masculinity weaponizes power and becomes the basis for social status and personal identity.” (116) Anyone who grew up among boys, say in school gym locker rooms (!), knows there are two kinds of boys and young men. Many are not like that at all and resist such socializing by their peers. Many suffer at the hands of boys like that. But James seems to believe that all boys are so socialized. I wasn’t. I know many boys and young men who weren’t. Sure, we were pressured by some peers to be that way, but we resisted that pressure.

Are there no men who are just nice and good in general (not perfect)? I would suggest there are many but that our culture likes to portray boys and men as either stupid and weak or “manly” in the way James describes above. Sure, there are exceptions in literature and entertainment, but overall and in general the portrayal of boys and men is that they are dangerous to the well-being of others unless they are tamed which often means being more like girls.

I grew up among boys. And there were bad boys and good boys. The bad boys were actually the minority, but they got most of the attention. The boys’ school gym locker room was a hellish nightmare in the 1960s when I was in junior high school and then high school. The vast majority of the boys resisted the pressure to join the bad boys’ clubs—cliques or gangs that fit the stereotype of “dominant, aggressive, controlling, and sexualized” to the detriment of girls and women and “weaker” boys (“nerds” and “girly-boys”).

My complaint about James is that she seems to have bought into a stereotype about males in general as people to be feared by women. Of course there are males women should fear and because they don’t know all the stranger men around them they have to be careful. I ask my wife not to go to any store after dark without me and if she has to, to park under a light near an entrance and move quickly. Why? Because most men are animals to be feared? No. Because some are. But they are a tiny minority of men. I would venture to say that most men are like the ones who came to James’ rescue when her car broke down. And I would venture to say Boaz was not an “exception” who only became good through contact with Ruth but an example of good men.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 24, 2015

Can a Pastor Baptize an Infant and Remain Baptist? (Some Thoughts about Identities)

Next Post

August 27, 2015 An Invitation to Hear Me Speak...with Bill Gaither

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days did Jesus fast in the wilderness?

Select your answer to see how you score.

12 7 40 30