Embarrased by the Supernatural?

Last updated on: April 29, 2015 at 7:13 am by Roger E. Olson

Embarrased by the Supernatural? 2015-04-29T07:13:14-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Embarrassed by the Supernatural?

Some years ago Stanley Hauerwas and William Willimon published an article in Christian Century that some believe launched the “postliberal” movement in Christian theology. The article’s title was “Embarrassed by God’s Presence.” (CC January 30, 1985) Hauerwas and Willimon accused “mainline” Protestant churches and theologies of conducting business as if God does not exist. This was, of course, hyperbole and intended to get attention, but the grain of truth in it raised many Christians’ consciousness about the prevailing secularity of modern Western Christianity and its accommodations to modernity.

My present concern, in this blog post, is with Western evangelicals—those Christians who claim to resist over accommodation to the Enlightenment, modernity and secularity and who claim to believe in and abide by the worldview of the Bible.

I teach modern theology in an evangelical seminary. I’ve taught modern theology in three American Christian universities over thirty-three years. I’ve spoken about modern theology in numerous American evangelical churches and institutions and written several books on modern theology. (The most recent is The Journey of Modern Theology: From Reconstruction to Deconstruction published by InterVarsity Press.) My students routinely react negatively to the secularism of much modern theology and much of modern theology’s accommodation to Enlightenment rationalism and naturalism. However, they are also routinely bemused by my claim that, by-and-large, American evangelical Christianity, including most Baptists, has also accommodated to modernity’s rationalism and naturalism.

How so? they rightly ask. My claim is that most contemporary American evangelical Christians only pay lip service to the supernatural whereas the Bible is saturated with it. To a very large extent we American evangelicals and Baptists have absorbed the worldview of modernity by relegating the supernatural, miracles, scientifically unexplainable interventions of God, to the past (“Bible times”) and elsewhere (“the mission fields”).

This is obvious in how we react to illness among ourselves. We pray for the sick—that God will comfort them and “be with them” in their misery. We pray that God will give their doctors skill as they treat them. But we avoid asking God to heal them. We avoid any mention of demons or demonic possession and strictly shun exorcism as primitive and superstitious—except when Jesus did it. We look down on churches that anoint the sick with oil and pray for their physical healing. We suspect they are “cultic” and probably encourage ill people not to seek medical treatment. We (perhaps rightly) make fun of evangelists who claim to have prayed for God to re-route hurricanes but never ourselves pray for God to save people from natural disasters. We have gradually adopted the idea that “Prayer doesn’t change things; it changes me” and, like Friedrich Schleiermacher, regard petitionary prayer as something for children.

We claim to believe in and follow the Bible but totally ignore James 5:14 “Is any sick among you? Let them call for the elders of the church to anoint them with oil and the prayer of faith will save the sick and the Lord will raise them up.” When do most American evangelical churches pray for the sick other than the mealy-mouthed “Dear Jesus help them not to suffer too much”?

I recently had a conversation with a friend who happens also to pastor a Baptist church. My friend is evangelical in his faith. His wife is a medical doctor. I shared with him my own testimony of physical healing—something I’m reluctant to do more often or publicly because even my fellow evangelicals and Baptists look skeptical when I share it. (I was healed of rheumatic fever when I was ten years old and have never suffered the usual heart damage from my months-long bout with the disease that had me hospitalized for weeks. The elders of a church anointed me with oil and prayed fervently for my healing. That week my doctor pronounced me well. No echocardiogram since has shown up any evidence of rheumatic heart disease. Most middle aged adults who suffered rheumatic fever with what my doctor called an “impressive heart murmur” have damage to their heart valves and eventually need valve replacement surgery.) My Baptist pastor friend shared with me that his little daughter was very ill. He went into her bedroom, anointed her forehead with oil and prayed fervently for her healing. She was healed. He admitted, however, that his church would probably not be favorable to this practice.

I am not advocating mass healing revivals or taking sick people hundreds of miles to be prayed for by a famous (or infamous) healing evangelist. What I am advocating is obeying Scripture in spite of the plain fact that the practice encouraged, even commanded there, does not always “work.” Not everyone prayed for is healed. There is no known explanation, but this does not justify avoiding prayers for the sick with anointing and laying on of hands (which in the Bible always accompanies anointing with oil).

My experience is that the richer and more educated we evangelicals and Baptists become the less likely we are to really believe in or expect miracles. We relegate the supernatural to the inner world of persons believing that God can change people’s hearts, but we do not really believe God intervenes in the physical world. Yet the Bible is full of examples of God’s interventions in the physical world, it commands us to pray for such, and evangelical (and Catholic) Christians in the Global South almost all believe in and pray for God’s miraculous interventions—especially in healing the sick.

For those who are skeptical of miracles but believe in God, I encourage them to read C. S. Lewis’ classic Miracles. It completely explodes the usual intellectual objections based on misinterpretations of “miracle.” A miracle, he rightly explains, is not a “violation of a law of nature” as if God had to “break into” and disrupt an autonomous natural system. That is a deist view of God and nature, not a Christian one.

I suspect our contemporary evangelical avoidance of the supernatural in the physical realm of reality has little to do with intellectual questions and issues. I suspect it has more to do with wanting our religion to be respectable; above all we don’t want to be viewed by the world around us as fanatics. The abuses of the supernatural seen on cable television cause us to drop it entirely. But, as the old saying goes, the cure for abuse is not disuse but proper use. We have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.

Over the years of teaching theology I have made a point of interrogating Christians who come to America to study theology from Africa, Asia and Latin America. I ask them about their view of American Christianity. Normally they are very reluctant to open up and say what they really think. But when I give them absolute freedom to be totally transparent they often say that they are shocked by American Christianity—including evangelical Christianity—because of its individualism, consumerism and lack of belief in the “spiritual world” by which they mean the supernatural. I, too, am shocked by these conditions of American evangelicalism.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 28, 2015

Thoughts about Old School Christian Hymns and Songs

Next Post

May 1, 2015 Is There (Can There Be) A "Christian Philosophy?"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul call himself in relation to the Corinthians, comparing his role to a father?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Their father in Christ Jesus through the gospel Their teacher and guide Their spiritual father Their apostle and shepherd