Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

rogereolson

Part 7 of Response to The Gospel as Center: Chapter 7 “What Is the Gospel?”

Last updated on: April 10, 2012 at 12:50 pm   by Roger E. Olson

Part 7 of Response to The Gospel as Center: Chapter 7 “What Is the Gospel?” 2012-04-10T12:50:17-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Part 7 of Response to The Gospel as Center. Chapter 7: “What Is the Gospel” by Bryan Chapell

Bryan Chapell is president of Covenant Theological Seminary and is Reformed Presbyterian. I approached this chapter expecting to find somewhere in it a ringing affirmation of monergism as part and parcel of the gospel. I was not disappointed, but I was wrong.

This is a marvelous chapter with which many good Arminians can agree whole heartedly. I suspect that would come as a shock to the editors of The Gospel as Center if not the author of this chapter.

I say “many good Arminians” simply because the chapter includes a strong endorsement of what is popularly known as “eternal security” or “perseverance of the saints.” However, many Arminians do agree with that; it is a matter of diversity of opinion among Arminians. (I don’t want to get into another argument about that here; I am simply stating my opinion. Take it or leave it.)

The main thrust of the chapter is well expressed in one sentence on page 126: “Our spiritual status is not determined by what we do but by what Christ has done.”

Some will argue that the chapter’s emphasis on faith as a gift conflicts with Arminianism. The author says on page 122 “even the faith we have is a gift of God (Eph. 2:8-9).” Whether “gift” in verse 9 refers back to faith or grace or both is debatable, but most, if not all, good Arminians agree that faith is a gift. Arminius affirmed it.

At the same time Arminians will want to say that faith is our response to the gift of God’s prevenient grace and offer of free salvation. Paradoxically (perhaps some will want to say “absurdly”) it is both “gift and task.” Elsewhere Paul asks rhetorically “What do you have that you have not received?” (1 Cor. 4:7) Obviously, whatever good thing we have is a gift of God to us. Arminians simply add that a gift must be received and, in another sense, faith is our reception of the gift of faith.

I wonder what the members of The Gospel Coalition will think if they hear that Arminians agree with the main points of Chapter 7? I hope they will rejoice. Somehow I doubt it. I hope I’m wrong.

Some may think that this chapter’s explanation of the atonement will offend Arminians. In fact, however, most Arminians have historically embraced the penal substitution theory and there is nothing in the chapter that a believer in the governmental theory could not affirm. And the chapter’s description of the atonement says nothing about it being intentionally limited. All it says is that “Christ’s atonement—though it is sufficient for everyone—does not apply to everyone.” (p. 119) Arminians agree.

To be sure, an Arminian determined to quibble and find fault will find something to disagree with in this chapter. And I’m not saying I agree with everything in it. All I’m saying is that there is nothing in it that conflicts with essential Arminianism.

I will even go further and say that it is an excellent summary of the gospel. Were it to be preached in my church I would have nothing against it. (Again, that is not to say I agree with everything in it, but I don’t hear very many sermons I agree with entirely. Even those with which I have some minor disagreement receive my imprimatur!)

Now, having said all that, let me say that I do not think someone who disagrees with the satisfaction or penal substitution theories of the atonement is denying the gospel. One can heartily affirm and endorse that view of the atonement without dismissing fellow evangelicals who believe in, say, the Christus Victor model or C. S. Lewis’ “Ideal Penitent Theory” as opponents of the gospel. Perhaps that is what Chapell is saying here, but I don’t find anything in the chapter that requires it.

The next chapter, Chapter 8, is “Christ’s Redemption” by Sandy Williams, a minister of the Evangelical Presbyterian Church. I look forward to reading it and responding to it here.

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 8, 2012

Truly he is risen!...He sure is! An Easter Meditation

Next Post



April 12, 2012 And Now...It's Time's Turn: April 16 (2012) Cover Story about Heaven


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth

Related posts from Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: The Abolition...

Roger E. Olson

Family

She Survived Her Execution. Should the State Try...

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man Part 2: Chapter 2:...

Roger E. Olson

Family

Ambiguity without Ambivalence in Faith

Roger E. Olson

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube