Some weekend miscellaneous thoughts

Last updated on: December 3, 2011 at 2:18 pm by Roger E. Olson

Some weekend miscellaneous thoughts 2011-12-03T14:18:20-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday I had a one-on-one lunch with sociologist Peter Berger. He invited me to lunch with him to discuss Calvinism. We had a very good discussion for about 90 minutes. I’ve known of Berger’s work in sociology of knowledge and secularization theory for many years and was delighted to meet him and talk with him. He feels as I do about Calvinism (at least five point Calvinism). He’s Lutheran and, by his own admission, somewhat liberal theologically. I did my best to inform him about the social significance of the “young, restless, Reformed” movement among evangelicals–something he was not aware of (at least not thoroughly familiar with). I had the opportunity to ask him something I’ve long wondered about: Why give up the secularization thesis about modernity and its effects just because religion seems to be making a come back? My own view is that much of the religious resurgence is quite compatible with secularity in that it does not seem really to affect people’s lives all that much. For example, evangelicals experience divorce just as often as do non-Christians. Is there a “secular Christianity?” (I’m not talking here about Bonhoeffer’s meaning of that.) I think so. Many churches that experience explosive growth seem not to inculcate the idea of costly grace (now I’m talking Bonhoeffer) in their adherents. The members seem to live pretty much like their non-Christian neighbors. My question is, is the giving up of the secularization thesis an example of bean counting? Are sociologists simply counting frequency of church attendance, etc.? Perhaps and perhaps not. But as a theologian looking more deeply into issues of discipleship and belief, I’m not all that impressed with the alleged resurgence of religion in America.

This week a brouhaha has broken out over a Baptist church in Kentucky that banned interracial marriage. That is, the Free Will Baptist Church passed a rule that interracial couples could not join the church. The secular media are having a field day with this–another opportunity to bash Baptists. an AP article published in the local newspaper (with the byline Dylan Lovan) attempts to explain Baptists and utterly fails. Just a little self-education via the internet could clear things up. First of all, Baptist churches are autonomous; Baptist denominations are not really denominations but conventions or conferences or associations. The most they can do is expel a congregation and that takes time. But the media seem to be blaming the National Association of Free Will Baptists, if not Baptists in general, for the racist attitude and action of that single rural congregation in Kentucky. The media people frequently display their ignorance about religion. This is another example. The article also dares to comment on the Free Will Baptists, suggesting they are a minority among Baptists. Here’s the direct quote from the AP article: “Free Will Baptists trace their history to the 18th century. They emphasized the Arminian doctrine of free will, free grace and free salvation, in contrast to most Baptists, who were Calvinists and believed Christ died only for those predestined to be saved.” Well, at least the writer spelled “Arminian” correctly! Why was this written in the past tense? That’s one puzzling thing about it. But also, it fails to mention that the FIRST Baptists were Arminian or at least synergists. Thomas Helwys and John Smyth and their followers most definitely were not Calvinists. The “particular Baptists” came later. I don’t know that anyone really knows the statistics regarding what “most Baptists” believed about predestination and free will at any point AFTER the mid-17th century when particular (Calvinist) Baptists came on the scene. Personally, I doubt there was ever a time when “most Baptists” believed in the whole TULIP scheme.

This past week I watched a really good movie–Sarah’s Key. It’s available on DVD now. I recommend it highly to those who have a high tolerance for drama about suffering children and the holocaust. Once again I came away from watching it wondering how anyone can believe that God planned, foreordained and rendered certain the sufferings of the two children in that movie. Of course, it is only a movie; it’s not even based on real events. However, events like it surely happened in Europe during the 1930s and 1940s–many times over. It’s a very sad movie, so I suggest keeping a box of tissues nearby as you watch it. But the acting is good, the plot is great, the emotional impact is powerful. And some things in it are historically true–such as that most Jews in Paris were rounded up and kept for a long time in a soccer stadium without working facilities, edible food or medical care. They were taken from there to various concentration camps where most were killed. The French police cooperated and acted as agents of the SS and Gestapo in all this–something the French government has expressed regret over.

One line in the movie especially hit home to me. An American woman in Paris is conducting research into French participation in the holocaust. A young French woman who works with her says something very disparaging about her near ancestors who did these things or at least did not speak up for the Jews of Paris as they were being taken away. The American woman says “Would you have acted differently?” The young French woman is stunned into silence.

This is the problem with making the holocaust unique. Some months ago I reported on a holocaust conference I attended where a young Israeli woman expert on the holocaust (she is somehow connected to Yad Vashem) condemned one speaker for using the word “holocaust” for other massacres in history–including the massacre of the innocents in Bethlehem by Herod. She called him a “holocaust denier.” The problem with this habit is that, while it seems to bring special attention to the holocaust and its intention is to prevent another one, it actually undermines the prevention of another one. IF we say the holocaust is unique, then we are implying that it could never happen again. The people who did it were simply monsters, not normal human beings. While there’s some truth in that, it can be taken too far and often is taken too far. Yes, of course, there were unique aspects to the holocaust, but to set it aside as completely unique so that anyone who compares it with other massacres and genocides in history is a “holocaust denier” could have the unintended consequence of setting it up to happen again by deluding people into thinking THEY are incapable of doing things like that.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 2, 2011

More about direct revelations from God

Next Post

December 4, 2011 "Lies, damned lies and statistics...."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of the garden where Jesus prayed before His arrest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eden Gethsemane Bethany Golgotha