Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

rogereolson

Returning to the illegal immigration issue…

Last updated on: August 18, 2011 at 7:25 pm   by Roger E. Olson

Returning to the illegal immigration issue… 2011-08-18T19:25:52-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

According to an AP news report dated July 16, 2011 (by Jay Reeves, Birmingham, Ala.) churches in Alabama are taking the lead in opposing the state’s new immigration law.

Some here have argued that nobody should or would interpret this law or others like it (e.g., in Oklahoma) as prohibiting giving a ride to a weary illegal immigrant on foot.  Here is what Alabama Baptist Convention president pastor Mike Shaw says in the article: “I am concerned about the language concerning giving a ride in an automobile to an illegal immigrant or allowing children of illegal immigrant parents to ride on a church bus to Sunday School, vacation Bible school, or church camp. … Should we ignore people who are injured or have broken down on the side of a busy interstate highway and have small children in sweltering heat with no family or friends to help them?”

My point exactly.

Now before some of you fine lawyers jump in to argue that the actual wording of the laws do not go that far, all I am saying is that this is how some DO interpret the laws already!

My point is…whatever the intentions of the lawmakers who wrote and voted for these laws, they do not go far enough in explicitly allowing humanitarian aid to illegal immigrants such as pastor Shaw mentions.  Therefore, the laws will inevitably CAST A CHILL over humanitarian aid.  People, however confused, will hesitate to give simple Christian or just humanitarian aid to illegal immigrants in their midst.

The article talks about congregations of many different denominations coming together to protest the law in Alabama.  It mentions and quotes one Chriss H. Doss, an attorney and Southern Baptist pastor who is concerned about the law in Alabama.

The Birmingham City Council passed a resolution calling for repeal of the law.

According to the article “Leaders of the United Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church, the Lutheran Church and the Roman Catholic Church all have criticized the law as running counter to biblical teachings about caring for neighbors, helping visitors and showing hospitality to strangers.”  The article makes clear that criticism of the law is not limited to one part of the theological spectrum, conservatives as well as liberals are speaking out against it and signing petitions for its repeal.

To me this is a good and hopeful sign.  These laws are anti-Christian in their effect if not in their intent.  I don’t know how the legislators that wrote them and voted for them can sleep at night knowing, as they must, that the laws will inevitably cause people to hesitate to render crucial aid to helpless and hurting women and children who are not in the U.S. by choice but by necessity.

The article is right to compare this to the 1950s and 1960s civil rights movement and that comparison comes from officials of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute.  All right thinking Christians (and right thinking human beings!) ought to raise their voices and speak truth to power that these laws are wrong.  They must be amended to permit individuals and organizations to offer humanitarian aid to illegal immigrants including rides, temporary shelter, food and clothing.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



July 19, 2011

Off topic but important! Suggestions needed...

Next Post



July 25, 2011 The emergent church movement challenged by a participant


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who opposed the rebuilding of the Temple and tried to discourage the Jews?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Their enemies/Samaritans Moabites Philistines Amalekites

Related posts from Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: The Abolition...

Roger E. Olson

Family

She Survived Her Execution. Should the State Try...

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man Part 2: Chapter 2:...

Roger E. Olson

Family

Ambiguity without Ambivalence in Faith

Roger E. Olson

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube