Recommendation of Donald G. Bloesch's theology

Last updated on: August 18, 2011 at 7:30 pm by Roger E. Olson

Recommendation of Donald G. Bloesch's theology 2011-08-18T19:30:51-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Recently I’ve been re-reading some books by my favorite American theologian Donald G. Bloesch (who died in August of this year). Bloesch was a member and minister of the United Church of Christ and one of its few evangelicals. He grew up in the Evangelical and Reformed Church (mostly Swiss Reformed immigrants) that merged with the American Congregational Churches to form the UCC. He was never comfortable with the liberalism of the UCC but chose to stay within it rather than abandon it totally to the liberals. He taught at a Presbyterian seminary–The University of Dubuque School of Theology.

When I was making my transition from Pentecostalism and Fundamentalism to “mainstream” evangelicalism during seminary in the mid-20s I found Bloesch to be my most faithful guide. I realize conservative evangelicals have some problems with him. He was never part of the fundamentalist movement and didn’t care about some of their issues such as young earth creationism, premillennialism and strict inerrancy. However, he was a staunch defender of biblical authority (together with the Holy Spirit that inspired and illumines the Bible), God’s creatorship of everything outside himself (creatio ex nihilo) and a literal, visible return of the risen Jesus Christ to earth (he promoted a version of postmillennialism which I never accepted).

Boesch’s approach to theology was basically Pietistic with some neo-orthodox flavoring thrown in. He called it “catholic evangelical” and “evangelical catholic” by which he meant emphasizing conversion and biblical authority while embracing the Great Tradition of Christian doctrinal orthodoxy. His main influences that he often quoted were the Reformers, the Pietists (Spener, Francke, Zinzendorf and Christoph Blumhardt), P. T. Forsyth and Kierkegaard. He also quoted Barth and Bunner positively but also critically.

Bloesch called his theology “progressive evangelical” by which he meant he used higher criticism of the Bible without anti-supernatural biases. In other words, he had no trouble acknowledging that the final verses of Mark are a later addition to the gospel (and etc.). But he believed in and strongly defended the supernatural inspiration of Scripture and its infallibility

Recently I’ve re-read (and taken copious notes on) one of his early books The Crisis of Piety (Eerdmans, 1969). I find it still very relevant to today’s American churches. Rarely do I read an entire book of theology without coming across something with which I strongly disagree. But this case is different. Bloesch’s diagnoses of the ills of American Christianity and his prescriptions are spot on. For example, to the so-called mainline, mostly liberal Protestant churches he urges a recovery of devotion and commitment to Jesus Christ as Lord–a renewal of genuine piety without secularism or fanaticism. To the evangelical churches he urges a recovery of a catholic vision of Christianity as rooted in the church fathers and Reformers. To everyone he urges a renaissance of conversion as event and process that is life transforming for both individuals and communities.

As I re-read The Crisis of Piety I was reminded of how sane, balanced and clear headed Bloesch was–a model evangelical theologian with something prophetic to say to every branch of the American churches. Here’s just a sample: “Devotion to Jesus Christ cannot long maintain itself apart from theological fidelity and integrity. A holy life divorced from sound doctrine soon becomes moralism. At the same time correct doctrine apart from a holy life is nothing other than intellectualism.” (p. 15)

You might wonder if Bloesch was a Calvinist. Well, he belonged to a Reformed denomination, but he hardly fit the profile of a high Calvinist. He affirms repeatedly that salvation includes a free human response to grace even though that response is itself grace enabled. Here is a typical Bloeschian statement: “Man is by nature bound to the powers of sin and death, but he becomes free in the moment of decision when the Spirit empowers him to respond to the offer of the gospel.” (p. 84)

I don’t know how many of Bloesch’s books are still in print. But I highly recommend him to all students of theology. If there is any one theologian who has shaped and formed me theologically more than any other one it is Bloesch. And that is because of his sanity and balance as a broadly evangelical thinker.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 17, 2010

A good analogy to the ULI of TULIP....

Next Post

December 26, 2010 A Much Neglected Basic Choice in Theology

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who's sight was restored by Ananias in Damascus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

King Saul Paul of Tarsus Pontius Pilate Saul of Tarsus