Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

rogereolson

Being a man is okay (if its the best you can do).

Last updated on: August 18, 2011 at 7:31 pm   by Roger E. Olson

Being a man is okay (if its the best you can do). 2011-08-18T19:31:16-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Occasionally I will stray away from obviously theological topics into something else that concerns me.  One of my pet peeves (actually a little stronger than that) is our society’s tendency to lurch to extremes in reaction to things.

Just one example of many that I could mention: the fact that teachers in public schools are generally forbidden to hug children.  Just because some adults have abused their power and have sexually abused children our society now denies children the extremely important experience of being hugged by adults other than their parents.  Related to that, a few years ago I read a district attorney of a large metropolitan area declare in the newspaper that the most dangerous place for children is not in the streets but in their own homes.  No conditions.  The clear implication was “all children”–as if all parents are abusive.

Our society has a tendency to over react to things.  We begin to recognize a social evil and then quickly rush to avoid it by going to extremes in the opposite direction.  (One exception to this, in my opinion, is poverty.)

I realize that I am almost alone in my concern about one example of this social tendency–society’s view of men and boys.  The old saying “It’s a man’s world” doesn’t hold anymore except in corporate board rooms and in terms of pay.  It’s true that women still do not earn as much as men for doing the same jobs.  There’s a lot of debate about why, but I’m willing to believe it is sheer gender discrimination.  That’s one area where, overall and in general (with exceptions in some industries) we haven’t reacted strongly enough to revelation of gender inequality.  Women should be paid the same as men for doing the same work.  Period.

And there are other areas where women have a ways to go and it’s up to men, at least in some cases, to remove obstacles we and our fathers have put in their way.  For example, women in ministry.  We need to grow up and face the reality that God calls women and step aside (if necessary) to fully facilitate women’s use of their gifts in the churches.  I have been a member of two churches (in my adult life) pastored by women and they were among the very best preachers and pastors I have ever known.  May their tribe increase.

So, I readily admit that in some areas of our society gender equality is still lacking for women.  But progress is being made.  NOW and other women’s organizations and the feminist movement in general have brought great benefit to women and I applaud them for that.

However, I believe (and I seem to be almost alone in this) that one deleterious side effect of all the good feminism and the women’s movement have brought about is a tendency to treat men and boys as defective human beings.  This appears in schools, in the media and in the health industries.

Let’s start with the media.  Yes, there are lots of male stars of TV and movies, but increasingly they are portrayed as either stupid (as in most TV sitcoms) or sinister (as in most movies).  Yes, yes, there are exceptions.  Of course.  But overall and in general one effect of the women’s movement has been an over reaction in the media to portray women as always strong and competent and men as stupid or sinister.

One example comes to mind (of many I could mention).  Why is it okay for women on TV and in movies to physically abuse men?  We’ve learned that domestic abuse is always wrong–except when it’s a woman physically abusing a man.  Take the show Everybody Loves Raymond, for example.  Ray’s wife often slapped, punched and kicked him–often in the groin–and everybody laughed as he recoiled in pain or doubled over in pain.  A frequent them in movies is women beating up men–often in ways that look wholly unlikely (e.g., a rather slightly build young lady completely demolishing a very large, muscular man).  Why is violence against women always wrong but violence by women against men is okay?

Last year ABC television aired a segment of its Primetime TV magazine show “What Would You Do?” in which two actors, one male and one female, pretended to be fighting in a public place.  The woman was slapping, hitting and kicking the man who was having trouble escaping.  Not one passerby or observer stepped in even though the woman actor was clearly getting the better of the man.  One woman jogging past the scene, completely taken in by the acting, raised her fist and shouted “You go girl!”  When the host of the show stopped her and asked her she said something to the effect that she assumed the man deserved it.  Huh?

I have not seen a man portrayed as a good and decent man with real competence and skill in a TV sitcom since Bill Cosby’s father character in the Bill Cosby Show–at least a decade or more ago.

Now, in case you’re thinking I feel badly for men, let me say–it’s not men I’m worried about.  It’s boys.  What must boys watching these shows and movies think it is to be a man?  What impression of society’s view of men do they get?  We want boys to grow up to be good husbands and fathers, but where are any good husbands or fathers on TV or in movies?  Some are “good” in the sense of “well-meaning,” but few are solid characters with real competence. 

Let me turn now to education.  Studies have shown that boys learn better from men than from women.  (Girls also learn better from women than from men.)  And yet the number of men teaching in the lower grades continues to dwindle.  What are the professional societies of educators and public school systems doing to recruit men teachers?  I haven’t seen anything about that.  Instead, whenever I see a teacher featured in an ad promoting education it’s a woman.  Yes, that reflects much of reality.  But when women were lacking in certain industries a lot of money and energy was put into public service spots in the media to recruit more women.  For example, there is a distinct lack of women in the fields of engineering–both in the academy and the industry.  As an educator I have encountered many efforts to recruit women students to enter that and other fields lacking in women.  There are many endeavors to help girls in mathematics and the sciences.  In the meantime there are very few endeavors to help boys become teachers or even to succeed in school.  The vast majority of dropouts are boys.  Girls are excelling beyond boys at every level of education.  Seventy percent of college and university students in America are females.

A couple years ago Newsweek featured a cover story about The Boy Crisis in public education.  It set off a flury of criticism from women’s groups as if we shouldn’t care that boys are failing in school.  I suspect that some women’s groups are afraid that any exposure of the boy crisis in public education will somehow detract from their efforts to help girls.  It doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game, however.  More help for boys (and men to become teachers) doesn’t have to detract from help for girls and women.

I could say much more about how our public schools and educational institutions are failing boys, but let me turn now to the fields of health and medicine.  Every February the American Heart Association launches a public ad campaign called “Go Red for Women.”  Great!  I’m all for bringing greater attention to women’s health.  But where are the campaigns for men’s heart health?  I haven’t seen a single public service announcement or educational event aimed specifically at men’s health by any non-profit organization in years.  Look at the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s work on behalf of victims of breast cancer.  I’m all for it.  But when is some non-profit health organization going to pay some attention to men?  More men than women die of cancer every year.  The AHA says more women than men die of heart disease, but it neglects to explain that many of them die of congestive heart failure in old age.  Men continue to die of heart attacks and strokes at younger ages than women.  When the statistics are age adjusted more men than women die of heart disease.  One never hears that.

You can’t turn around without seeing an ad or pink ribben symbol or something aimed at women’s health.  That’s great.  I’m all for it. But I’m also for more attention to men’s health since men die on average 5 to 6 years younger than women.  If the statistic were reversed with women dying 5 to 6 years younger than men I’m sure we would hear about it all the time and there would be great efforts aimed at ameliorating that.  Instead, the federal government funds and runs an Office for Women’s Health that funds and encourages research on women’s health.  There is no parallel office for men’s health.  Such has been suggested in congress for years, but nothing has come of the bill.

Sure, men are largely to blame for their own poor health.  But it’s still a public health issue–partly because when men die young(er) they often leave behind an impoverished wife and sometimes children. 

I could go on and on.  Please know that I am in no way advocating less attention to women’s health and education.  And I think it’s good that women are generally portrayed as strong and competent and good on TV and in movies.  What I’m against is thinking that boys and men have to be ignored or badly portrayed in order to promote the well being of girls and women and, to some extent, at least, that is happening. 

Garrison Keillor said it best in his Book of Guys (paraphrasing here): Being a man used to be an advantage, now it is just a problem.  Indeed.  But I don’t really care that much about men.  We can take care of ourselves.  It’s the boys I worry about. 

The University of Kent (England) recently conducted a study that showed that boys are falling behind girls in schools in part, at least, because they are expected to perform less well than girls.  (“Gender Expectations and Stereotype Threat”).  In other words, European and American societies are raising boys many of who will end up in prison and/or unemployed and drifting because that’s what we expect them to be when they grow up.  That’s especially true with regard to minorities.  But I believe it is also true, to some extent, across the board.

So what should concerned people do?  I write letters to the editor and occasional guest columns about these situations–advocating more attention to men’s health and better role models of men for boys in the media, etc.  I write letters to organizations that I perceive to be neglecting men’s health or ignoring boys’ education.  I have written numerous e-mails to TV shows when they continually portray men as murderers, incompetent nincompoops and cute but silly idiots. 

My basic assumption is that two wrongs do not make a right.  Yes, our society is guilty of having oppressed women.  But that is largely being addressed.  For the most part, anyway, educated movers and shakers of society are aware of the need to make sure girls and women have equal opportunity.  In the field of education that is definitely the case even if a few disciplines such as engineeering are still largley populated by males.  (I have yet to see the same advocates for girls and women in higher education arguing that nursing or teaching or social work would be better with more men involved!)  I think some people think men deserve the treatment they are increasingly getting (and I’ve only touched on some of the examples–another is that men get harsher sentences for the same crimes women commit) because of the sins of our fathers (and some of us).  Perhaps.  But what about the boys?  Boys are increasingly growing up unsure of the value of being male.  Boys need respect, too.  By and large they aren’t getting it from society.  Girls are.  I don’t think our boys deserve to suffer for the sins of their fathers and grandfathers and male ancestors.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



November 22, 2010

November 22, 1963

Next Post



November 25, 2010 God's sovereignty in the crucifixion of Jesus


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many times did Elisha multiply food?

Select your answer to see how you score.

2 3 1 4

Related posts from Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: The Abolition...

Roger E. Olson

Family

She Survived Her Execution. Should the State Try...

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man Part 2: Chapter 2:...

Roger E. Olson

Family

Ambiguity without Ambivalence in Faith

Roger E. Olson

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube