And now a word about…Arminianism

Last updated on: August 18, 2011 at 7:32 pm by Roger E. Olson

And now a word about…Arminianism 2011-08-18T19:32:18-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My blog is called “My evangelical, Arminian theological musings.” I’ve “mused” about evangelicalism. Now it’s time to begin a brief (I hope) series of posts about Arminianism.

Not long ago I met a well-known philosopher-theologian whose first comment to me was “Well, I’ve never met anyone who actually called himself an Arminian before.” Many years ago John Wesley wrote a brief essay entitled “The Question ‘What Is an Arminian?’ Answered by a Lover of Free Grace.” (I’m sure you can find it on the web if you are interested.) He began it with this line: “To say ‘This man is an Arminian,’ has the same effect on many hearers, as to say ‘This man is a mad dog’.” Near the essay’s end Wesley wrote “[h]ow can any man know what Arminius held, who has never read one page of his writings? Let no man bawl against Arminians, till he knows what the term means….”

To that, I say a hearty “Amen!” Far too many people have a negative opinion of Arminianism and Arminians who have never read Arminius or any real (i.e., classical) Arminian theologians. Most of the critics of Arminianism that I have read (and I’ve read many!) seem only to have read Reformed secondary sources such as Charles Hodge or (more recently) R. C. Sproul. I rarely read a Reformed critique of Arminianism that is even close to being correct.

That’s why I wrote Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities a few years ago (InterVarsity Press). There I discuss and correct ten common misconceptions about Arminian theology. My goal (again, call me Don Quixote if you wish!) is to recover the good reputation of Arminianism so that those who are Arminian can call themselves what they are without wincing.

A few years ago I met two very well-known Arminian theologians at a national professional society meeting. Both are evangelical Methodists. To both I said “It’s good to meet a fellow Arminian.” Both replied (separately) “I’m not an Arminian.” And yet, having read their books and articles, I know they agree entirely with Arminius and classical Arminianism about almost everything. Why do they deny being Arminian? I can only assume it is because in some evangelical circles embracing “Arminian” as a label can cause you real trouble.

Again, I’m sure someone will ask “Why do you care about a label?” Well, why do Calvinists care about the label “Reformed?” And yet they do go around defending it and explaining what it means against those who misrepresent it. We all have certain labels we care about. I’ve been an Arminian my entire life (even before I knew what it was!) and I’m not willing to discard the label just because some people insist on going around misrepresenting it.

I think one of the funniest events about that label was during my Bible college days. This was a Pentecostal Bible college and almost all Pentecostals are avid Arminians whether they know it or not. The professor mentioned that we were Arminians and a sweet young student piped up loudly with “Who would want to be from Armenia?”

Right now I’m working on two plenary session addresses for an upcoming conference on Arminian theology at Andrews University (the Seventh-Day Adventist University and Seminary in Michigan). (For those interested it is October 14-17; you can find information about it by going to Andrews University’s web site.) My first address will be “Arminian Theology is God-centered Theology.” There I will prove, against those who claim Arminianism is “man-centered,” that classical Arminianism has always believed and taught that “The chief end of man is the glorify God and enjoy him forever” (the answer to the first question of the Westminster Shorter Catechism). Those who argue that Arminianism is “man-centered” have simply not read Arminius or Wesley or any other historical, classical Arminian theologians.

My second address will be “Arminian Theology is Evangelical Theology.” There I will quote extensively from Arminius, Wesley and other classical Arminians to prove that, contrary to critics, classical Arminianism has always believed and taught that salvation is entirely by God’s grace through faith alone to the exclusion of good works (as any basis for salvation).

I have come to the conclusion that SOME critics of Arminian theology are willfully ignorant as they continue to bash Arminianism as, for example, semi-Pelagian and man-centered. I have sent them my book and pointed them to passages in Arminius’ writings and in historical, classical Arminian theology that disprove these things. But they continue to utter them anyway. Some of them have too much invested in their crusades against Arminianism to back down now.

I firmly believe and will continue to argue that Arminian theology is a viable evangelical theology that fully adheres to the five great “solas” of the Reformation: sola scriptura, sola Christi, sola gratia, sola fides and sola gloria Dei. (Excuse my lapse in Latin if I’ve made a mistake in any of those phrases. It’s early in the morning and I’m not willing to go check my Latin!)

To those curious about what Arminian theology really is and why it’s important…stay tuned. Here’s a bit to whet the appetite: By-and-large today’s numerous “young, restless, Reformed” Christians are misled to think that Calvinism is the only intellectually respectable, biblical, evangelical alternative. They are largely unaware of anything between Calvinism, as taught to them by the likes of John Piper and R. C. Sproul (filtered to them through popularizers like Mark Driscoll) and the heresy of semi-Pelagianism (the belief that humans initiate their own salvation and contribute to it–the theology of “Touched by an Angel”). They are largely ignorant of Arminianism. I don’t care about the label merely as a label. I care about the reputation of God and, in my considered opinion, only classical Arminianism preserves and protects the all-important biblical truths expressed in Philippians 2:12-13.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 3, 2010

A matter of integrity?

Next Post

August 5, 2010 What is an Arminian?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth