Gay Marriage: The Real Victory

Last updated on: June 27, 2015 at 12:29 pm by Robert Hunt

Gay Marriage: The Real Victory 2015-06-27T12:29:47-06:00 Robert Hunt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The real victory in the Supreme Court decision on gay marriage was secularity, and its near final triumph as a social system. And the biggest loser is the non-modern worldview that is still common in many segments of American society. Particular losers are religious claims to be have something to say about social structures and processes of social change. In this new world the freedom of religion is essentially the freedom to be irrelevant.

This was not a victory for love, as some Christians claim. It was a victory for the irrelevance of such sentimental references to Christian values.

In the non-modern worldview the identity and role of human persons, as well as the social structures within which they live, were created by God along with the natural order as expressed in so-called laws of nature. And in this non-modern worldview rational observation of human nature, social structures, and natural law were complimentary to God’s revelation. Where revelation and rational observation appear to be in conflict then there is either a problem in rational observation or in the interpretation of revelation, with the church’s interpretation of revelation usually taking precedence over rational observation.

One could say that modernity arose out of a gradual prioritizing of rational observation over revelation, to the point that revelation was marginalized as a source of knowledge about human nature, social structures, or the natural order. Not that everyone came on board. Theologians moderated and changed their claims about revelation to suit modernity. Fundamentalism was a direct attack on modernism. And even today conservative Christians, Muslims, and Jews argue that revealed understandings of human nature and social order should have priority over, or at least critique and correct supposedly scientific arguments. In one way or another religious people still claim that science alone cannot really tell us what it means to be human and live in human society.

But as the founding documents of the United States suggest, God’s role in the human world is more limited than religion usually claims. According to the Declaration of Independence, God endows humans with certain inalienable rights. And as the Constitution makes clear, it is the human task to form societies and governments. And thus humans are free to decide what it means to be a human in society and enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

What the Supreme Court has done is simply to carry this process of putting humans in charge of their own self-understanding further than was previously imagined in American society. The court has recognized that Americans have a constitutional right to decide that being fully human may include both being a LGBT person and establishing a marriage relationship with another such human. And thus it has removed from religion one of its final claims in the public realm – the claim to authoritative public knowledge of what it means to be human.

For Christians this poses two challenges. First – how to create a Christian discourse that goes beyond the decades of accusations concerning inclusion and exclusion, human rights, and Biblical interpretation to clearly address the true disagreement, which is how and whether God is relevant to the self-understanding of being human in the world. Religious people fundamentally disagree with one another about this. And American and European progressive Christians fundamentally disagree with the majority of Christians and religious people in the West and worldwide.

And secondly – to understand how Christians (or indeed followers of any religion) can make a credible witness in a realm of public discourse that has now given humans full autonomy to determine what it means to be human. Does the progressive Christian position add anything to our knowledge of what it means to be human that is relevant to decision making in the public realm?

Christian Identity

Inter-Religious Dialogue

Previous Post

June 19, 2015

Anxiety and Extremism - Religion's Gift?

Next Post

June 29, 2015 Love Wins?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christian Identity Christian Muslim Relations Home Page Inter-Religious Dialogue Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 May 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz