Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

THE CURRENT - Leading the Following Way

Home
Evangelical
Does Your Church Dance?

Does Your Church Dance?

Last updated on: July 18, 2015 at 6:33 pm by Robert C. Crosby

Does Your Church Dance? 2015-07-18T18:33:57-04:00 Robert C. Crosby

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Does your church dance? The early church did. In fact, the early church danced the way God dances.

There is a need for a more biblical metaphor for organizations, and in particular for ecclesial organizations. In light of this need, a new metaphor is presented in the form of the Perichoretic Organization. This metaphor is based on the Trinity, also described as The Divine Community or Team, and their interrelation, interactions or organization. This Perichoretic Union was contemplated much by some early Christian theologians.

The foremost metaphor or model for organizations, both communitarian and vocational, in the Bible is that of the Trinity (Cladis, 1999). From the early development of Christian theology, the relational union of the members of the Trinity has been referred to as perichoresis or the perichoretic union. As the Imago Dei is the Latin Term for the “image of God”, the comparable term that could be used to represent the perichoretic relationship or “organization” is Corpus Dei. At the heart of this concept is simply … a dance.

Trinitarian thinking has emerged in recent history to become “one of the most widely acknowledged Christian teachings (Grenz, 2004, p. 1).” “The doctrine of the Trinity is not ultimately a teaching about ‘God’ but a teaching about God’s life within himself, with us and our life with each other, [thus a concept with much organizational significance]. It is the life of communion and indwelling, God in us, all of us in each other (Grenz, 2001, p. 55).” Since the Trinity represents the highest form of order, organization and relational unity, it seems an ideal metaphor to consider for organizations and is presented here with anticipation. Arguably, the members of the Trinity are seen in Scripture as sharing in interrelational activities – the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Stanley and Willits (2004) describe it this way:

Throughout the Scriptures, the Trinity – God the Father, Son, and Spirit – is seen expressing a unique, affirming kind of relationship toward one another. They are seen enjoying one another (Gen. 1:26), encouraging one another (Mt. 3:17), supporting one another (John 14:25), loving one another (Mk. 9:7), deferring to one another (John 14:10), and glorifying one another (John 17:1). (p. 41)

Not only does Christ call his followers to come together and form a relational organization of sorts, he described his desire for exactly how it would be characterized: “May they be one, even as you and I are one (John 17:21).” So, God calls his followers to come together in fellowship (Gk: koinonia). However, one of the reasons God calls his followers into fellowship as persons is because he is, in fact, a fellowship of persons, three Persons. In his prayer in John 17, then, Christ was calling for the church to be a perichoretic union or organization.

The Dancing Church

Perhaps the best term to describe the relationship that exists between the members of the Trinity is interrelation (Grenz, 2000, p. 68). The interrelation that exists between the members of the Trinity holds more than mere organizational significance. More importantly, it is innate and organic. That is to say, the interrelationship is not contrived, but rather something inherent within the very nature of God and the Godhead. According to Cladis (1999), it is more like a flowing dance than a rigid organizational model:

In the seventh century, John of Damascus, a Greek theologian, described the relationship of the persons of God (Trinity) as perichoresis. Perichoresis means literally “circle dance.” Choros in ancient Greek referred to a round dance performed at banquets and festive occasions. The verb form, choreuo, meant to dance in a round dance. (These round dances often included singing, hence the English word chorus.) The prefix peri (Greek for round about or all around) emphasized the circularity of the holy dance envisioned by John.

Based on the biblical descriptions of Father, Son and Spirit, John depicted the three persons of the Trinity in a circle. A perichoretic image of the Trinity is that of the three persons of God in constant movement in a circle that implies intimacy, equality, unity, and yet distinction among the various members and love.

Theologian Shirley Guthrie calls this image of God a “lovely picture that portrays the persons of the Trinity in a kind of “choreography” (Greek choros-graphy), similar to ballet. In this circle dance of God is a sense of joy, freedom, song, intimacy, and harmony. “The oneness of God is not the oneness of a distinct, self-contained individual; it is the unity of a community of persons who love each other and live together in harmony. (pp. 4-5)

Thus, it would seem that the Trinity emerges as the highest and most essential Biblical model or metaphor for relationships and for effective organizations. Every other model is but a reflection of this central one.

Previous Post

February 23, 2015

Moses - The Tri-Cultural Leader

Next Post

August 1, 2015 God's Palette - The 8 Promises of Creation

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abandonment Addictions America Atheism Beautiful Orthodoxy Beauty Belief Bible Bible study Boomers Busters Change Charismatic Christ Church Collaboration Color Communication Community Compassion Conflict Conscience Couples Creation Creative Creativity Cross Culture Dancing Democrat Design Discipleship Discouragement Dreams Ecclesiology Economy Ecumenism Education Election Emotions Encouragement Ethics Evangelism Exodus Faith Fellowship Following Food Friendship Generations Giving God Good Gospel Grace Heresy Hermeneutics Heroes Holiness Holy Spirit Homosexuality Honor Hope Humility Husband Identity Innovation Intimacy Introverts Jesus JFK John F. Kennedy Journey joy Judgment Knowing God leadership Lifeword Love Marriage Materialism Millennials Ministry Moses multi-cultural Mystery Obedience Organization Outreach Parenting Pentecostal Pentecostalism Personality Pneumatology Politics Power Prayer Preaching Presidents Pride Promises Prosperity Prosperity Gospel Relationship Religion Remembrance Repentance Republican Revelation Revival Salvation Self Servanthood Sin Soul Spirit Suffering Teaming Teams Technology Trinity Trust Truth Uncategorized Values Video Games Violence Vision Voting Wife Work Worship Young Men

Select a Month August 2015 July 2015 February 2015 April 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz