#BlackLivesMatter and the Theology of a Social Movement-Part 1

Last updated on: June 10, 2016 at 10:56 am by Andre E. Johnson

#BlackLivesMatter and the Theology of a Social Movement-Part 1 2016-06-10T10:56:38-05:00 Andre E. Johnson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I recently started a bible study series at our church titled “Black Lives Matter and the Theology of a Social Movement.” It is a seven week study that examines the BLM movement through the lens of James Cone’s Black Theology. The goal of the class is to demonstrate how people of faith (particularly the Christian faith) can begin not only to better understand the movement, but also to see social movements as part of the faith walk. When we look at the principles that guide BLM, we quickly see that those principles are not antithetical to faith commitments. However, I talk to many people of faith and Christians in particular who still have some reservations about BLM. While some say that there are sympathetic to the movement, others believe that “All Lives Matter” should be our mantra. It is in this debate that I decided to offer this study.

Intentionality of Incarnation

I decided first to lay the foundation for the rest of the study by sharing something I have been working on for a while now. I call it the Intentionality of Incarnation. In the Christian faith, the incarnation states that God dwell in the body of Jesus while here on earth. It is where many of us get the notion that Jesus was fully God and fully human. I simply argue that if we are to believe this doctrine, then we also must believe that God was particular in what God wanted to do. God was intentional. Thus I define the Intentionality of Incarnation as approach to interpretation, mission, and theology that takes seriously the conditions in which God decided to dwell on earth and the location/position that God took in Jesus to do the work of God. In other words, if Christians are going to affirm the incarnation, then we must examine God’s intention when God decided to dwell in the person of Jesus.

After offering this as a foundation to the study, we then examined Luke 4:18-21 and Romans 12:4-10. We read in the Luke text Jesus’ mission and in the Romans text, we read Paul’s metaphor of the church as the body of Christ. As we read and broke up into group to discuss the texts more, we begin to see something. We saw the connection between Jesus’ body and the body of Christ. In other words, if Jesus did those things (found in Luke 4) in his body while on earth and if the church is now the body of Christ (found in Romans 12), then we surmised that the church (as body of Christ) should do what Jesus did in his body while Jesus was on earth.

After our discovery, we then started talking about how Jesus acted as he went on his way. I started our study here because I believe it gives us a good foundation to expand our theological paradigms. What an Intentionality of Incarnational approach does is to force us to reexamine our hermeneutical presuppositions and engage in thoughtful theological reflection. It forces us to reread biblical texts and challenge rhetorical constructions of God, tradition, dogma, and doctrine. It allows us to ask questions and talk with each other to discuss and discern how the Spirit is operating today. It opens us up to new revelations and thoughts to do contextual theology. In short, it allows us to examine the BLM movement without fear or trepidation. We can see where the Spirit leads and we also can allow the Spirit to have its way.

Andre E. Johnson is the managing Editor and Founder of R3. He is also Pastor of Gifts of Life Ministries in Memphis, Tennessee

Donate to the Work of R3

Like the work we do at Rhetoric Race and Religion? Please consider helping us continue to do this work. All donations are tax-deductible through Gifts of Life Ministries/G’Life Outreach, a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization, and our fiscal sponsor. Any donation helps. Just click here to support our work.

Previous Post

May 30, 2016

Day Two: Memories of a Massacre: Memphis in 1866 Symposium

Next Post

June 12, 2016 Jesus and the Call to be Queer

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Amy Steele Andre E. Johnson Book Reviews/Series Brian Foulks Call for Chapters Carol Howard Merritt Classes Conferences Contributors Crystal St.Marie Lewis Daniel White Hodge Earle Fisher Eulogy Fredrick Robinson Guest Contributions Henry McNeal Turner Institutes Interviews Joseph Boston Katherine Whitfield Kimberly Peeler-Ringer Lectures/Roundtables Natalie Bullock Brown R3 Book Series R3 Contributor Rashad Grove Readers Reflections Symposiums Teaching Traci Ellis Travis Harris Uncategorized Video

Select a Month June 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 October 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz