Where is the Smoke: The #Rhetoric of a Riot

Last updated on: October 7, 2013 at 7:00 am by Guest Contributor

Where is the Smoke: The #Rhetoric of a Riot 2013-10-07T07:00:00-05:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by Cedrick Von Jackson

R3 Contributor

Under federal law, a riot is a public disturbance involving an act of violence by one or more persons assembled in a group of at least three people. Inciting a riot applies to a person who organizes, encourages, or participates in a riot. It can apply to one who urges or instigates others to riot. According to 18 USCS § 2102 “to incite a riot”, or “to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot”, includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.”

Many of us live and die by social media. Unfortunately Facebook and Twitter, for so many, have become the most credible sources of the latest relevant news. So, it comes as no surprise to me that a post by one Mary Burrell is being taken as credible news in light of the recent rhetoric surrounding the Affordable Health Care Act. According to Ms. Burrell, whose Facebook profile identifies her political views as “Sarah Palin,” the language of the Affordable Health Care Act, also unfortunately labeled as “Obamacare,” contains this curious word, “Dhimmitude.” Dhimmitude, according to Ms. Burrell’s post, is defined as “the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations conquered through jihad (Holy War). Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-Muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to Islam!” Additionally, Burrell states that Muslims are exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance because Muslims consider insurance to be “gambling, risk-taking, and usury” which are all banned by Islam.

In essence, Burrell is accusing the President of Islamic evangelism and providing governmental perks to those of the Islamic faith. And we, as a Christian nation, should be ashamed of ourselves for allowing such proselytizing and favoritism to not only be running amuck, but to be endorsed from the nation’s highest office. Well, the origin of thought behind this rhetoric is no secret. We are still stuck on, “His name is Barack Hussein Obama, II, so he must be a Muslim.” We have yet to get beyond, “His pastor was Jeremiah Wright, who damned America, and he listened to all those sermons for all those years.” We cannot get beyond, “He can’t be an American citizen, because I still ain’t seen his real birth certificate, yet.” And now, according to Burrell, the latest strike against the President is, “He’s giving folk like him the hook-up!” It is tearing at the fabric of the American tapestry.

Interesting thing, though. While I have not read the Affordable Health Care Act in its entirety, I have done a little “technology-aided, research-based fact checking.” That’s right. I “Googled” the Affordable Health Care Act. Several times. And I downloaded actual copies of the act in a pdf format. There is a little function in pdf files called, “Find,” which gives you the ability to search the entire document for certain words or phrases. So, I typed in the word, “Dhimmitude,” and set the Adobe program off on its digital fox hunt. You will never guess what message came back every time I conducted a search. “Reader has finished searching the document. NO MATCHES WERE FOUND” (emphasis mine). Not only is Dhimmitude not found on page 107 of the document as indicated by Burrell. It is not found ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT! My fox hunt had turned out to be a wild goose chase. On top of that, “dhimmitude” is not even a real word according to The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. “Dhimmi” is found in The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. But it is described as a “non-Muslim under protection of Muslim law,” which could include anyone of any religious faith or those who do not practice any religious faith in particular.

So, if “Dhimmitude” is not to be found in the Affordable Health Care Act, nor is it to be found in Muslim or Islamic usage, what could be the point of promoting such deceitful propaganda? I think it falls under the category of inciting a riot. Not within the scope of shouting “fire” in a crowded movie theater. But this type of language does cause a public disturbance which involves violence and discord of a linguistic nature. This violence is aimed, as so many times before, at the character and persona of our nation’s leader. The intent is to frighten the masses into a frenzy founded on an implied attack on Christian values and the American Way. In the case of shouting “fire” in a crowded public space, the thought behind the strategy is often to get the masses running and looking in one direction while something else is afoot in the other direction. In line with this strategy, shouting “Dhimmitude” in this public space seems to be geared toward getting the masses to run and look in the direction of Obamacare, which is now being suddenly painted as pro-Islamic and pro-Muslim, while something else is afoot in the other direction – a dismantling of what the President stands for and has tried to accomplish, on the whole.

With social media platforms like Facebook available to the masses, it is becoming easier and easier to shout “fire” in this very public manner. The unfortunate truth is that once “fire” is first shouted, most of the time we do not check the validity of the shout. One person shouts, others start shouting. One person runs, others start running. One person posts bogus status updates, others start sharing those bogus status updates. All of this would be quite easy to fix if, every once in a while, someone stopped to take notice of whether or not anyone actually saw any smoke.

Follow Cedrick on Twitter @breadcrumbpath

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 5, 2013

The Modern Need for Lamentations

Next Post

October 8, 2013 He Talk White: The Scholarly and Artistic Works of a Writer

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Amy Steele Andre E. Johnson Book Reviews/Series Brian Foulks Call for Chapters Carol Howard Merritt Classes Conferences Contributors Crystal St.Marie Lewis Daniel White Hodge Earle Fisher Eulogy Fredrick Robinson Guest Contributions Henry McNeal Turner Institutes Interviews Joseph Boston Katherine Whitfield Kimberly Peeler-Ringer Lectures/Roundtables Natalie Bullock Brown R3 Book Series R3 Contributor Rashad Grove Readers Reflections Symposiums Teaching Traci Ellis Travis Harris Uncategorized Video

Select a Month June 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 October 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz