Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Cultivating Knowledge of Christian History is a Moral Obligation

Last updated on: September 2, 2013 at 8:36 am   by Andre E. Johnson

Cultivating Knowledge of Christian History is a Moral Obligation 2013-09-02T08:36:00-05:00 Andre E. Johnson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by Crystal St. Marie Lewis
R3 Contributor

*This first appeared at Crystal St. Marie Lewis blog

Last night, I entered a conversation about theology on Facebook– something I vowed never to do again after the “Crystal-you-must-worship-the-devil-because-you-just-said-that-David-and-Jonathan-were-in-love” debacle of 2010. (Yes, in an effort to show that the Bible is not clear on the topic of same-sex relationships, I invoked the long-controversial and hotly-debated ambiguous relationship between David and Jonathan. Both the relationship and the language used to describe the relationship are unclear, I argued. I appealed to scripture and the original language– yet I did not succeed at making my conversation partners think twice about their assumptions. I only succeeded at causing them to unanimously declare that I must “worship the devil”. Moving right along.)

Last night’s long conversation began when a friend posted a quote and asked for our thoughts on what he shared:

“Ascertaining what someone means by the word ‘love’ is almost as difficult a ascertaining what some someone means by ‘God.’ As Mildred Bangs Wynkoop has said, love is a notoriously ambiguous ‘weasel word.’” (Thomas Jay Oord)

One gentleman said that the quote made no sense, as the meaning of “love” is easy to ascertain when its definition is based on the attributes found in the God of the Bible. I wrote in response to him:

An argument can be made that much of what is portrayed as “God” in scripture is more abusive than it is loving. I do think that both “love” and “God/god” are loaded words.

And all hell broke loose.

The conversation devolved into a strange space in which I repeatedly wrote that the image of a God who would kill his son to satisfy his own wrath should give us pause. However, the gentleman to whom I was writing argued that such an image is perfectly okay, as long as it’s God doing the son-killing and not us. I wrote to him that “the doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement asks us to worship that which we could never morally justify imitating,” but it was not received well. My statement was said to be the humanistic claim of someone who “thinks too much”.

As I exited the conversation last night, I remembered the first time anyone had ever suggested to me that there might be something morally wrong with my religious belief system. It happened during a chat about the doctrine of hell when an agnostic friend called my God a “torturer”. He referred to Christianity as a “cluster of recycled mythology” and to Christians as a herd of people ignorant of our own roots. I found what he said so off-putting, so utterly jarring, that I shut him down completely, and refused to even think about his assertions.

Months later, while overtaken by curiosity, I did some research and discovered that he was right… Right about everything. Right about the “mythologies”. Right about the historical use of those mythologies to control people. Even right about the average Christian’s lack of knowledge when it comes to the history of the faith. I remember being angry that I had given myself so unquestioningly to what I believed, and even angrier that given the intricate history of Christian beliefs and doctrine, there had not been more discussion in my churches about the depths of our background. This morning, upon re-reading my crazy Facebook discussion– the discussion in which I was told that it was evil for people to shun Jesus, but that God would expect a good Christian to shun a loved one with whom he disagreed– I experienced those confused, and even angry, feelings again.

I believe our churches are morally obligated to acknowledge the psychological power religions can have over people. Because we know the negative effects of fundamentalism, the complex history of Christianity as an imperial power, and the ongoing problem of Christians bypassing love in favor of division and doctrine, we

have an obligation to head blind-believerism off at the pass. If the Christian religion is ever to truly be about love and not power, or love and not idolatry, or even love rather than merely being “right,” then we have to talk more openly about our imperfect, human beginnings to church attendees. This is how we become a religion that isn’t opposed to intellectualism. This is how we become a religion committed to calling all forms of violence evil, even when committed by a “deity”. This is how we demonstrate that honoring the truth is the basis of our moral fiber. This is how we cultivate a faith beyond fundamentalism.

Follow Crystal on Twitter @crystallewis

Uncategorized

Previous Post



September 1, 2013

Diverse But Not Integrated: Religion’s Race Problem

Next Post



September 3, 2013 Announcement: Publication of the Third Volume of the Writings of Henry McNeal Turner


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Amy Steele Andre E. Johnson Book Reviews/Series Brian Foulks Call for Chapters Carol Howard Merritt Classes Conferences Contributors Crystal St.Marie Lewis Daniel White Hodge Earle Fisher Eulogy Fredrick Robinson Guest Contributions Henry McNeal Turner Institutes Interviews Joseph Boston Katherine Whitfield Kimberly Peeler-Ringer Lectures/Roundtables Natalie Bullock Brown R3 Book Series R3 Contributor Rashad Grove Readers Reflections Symposiums Teaching Traci Ellis Travis Harris Uncategorized Video

Select a Month June 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 October 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the primary inheritance method in biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Oldest daughter Equal division Firstborn son Youngest child

Related posts from Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

Why Christian Nationalism Betrays the Gospel

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

White People of Faith Who Affirm #BLM: How...

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

Deferred Dreams: The Consequence of Misaligned Personhood in...

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

Not Training but Character

Rhetoric Race and Religion

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Brandy Anderson, Team Weird, and Transcending Church

I met author Brandy Anderson on Heretic Happy Hour, when podcaster Keith...

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube