Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Rhetoric Race and Terrorism

Last updated on: May 8, 2013 at 2:45 pm   by Andre E. Johnson

Rhetoric Race and Terrorism 2013-05-08T14:45:00-05:00 Andre E. Johnson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by Giovanni Neal

R3 Contributor

In America, the word terrorism is a heavily debated one.  These days terrorism is not implied, we wait on our government to determine if something was an act of terrorism.  Additionally, it seems as though being classified as a terrorist has more to do with one’s religious affiliation and race.   I can think of three recent instances where the word(s) terrorism or terrorist was at issue.  Benghazi, Boston and Assata Shakur.

On September 11th2012, the U.S Consulate in Benghazi was mobbed and four Americans were killed. I immediately thought terrorism.  President Obama, however, blamed the attack on a video titled the “Innocence of Muslims.” The Innocence of Muslims made fun of Muhammad, who is never to be visually depicted.  The short film sparked protests in Egypt that spread to other Muslim countries.  In his explanation, President Obama forgot to use the word terrorism as if it weren’t already implied.  He made it seem as though the attacks were just a result of protest of the film.  But when does protest become terrorism?

After the attacks there was a right-winged inquisition to find out if the Benghazi attacks arose from a spontaneous protest like President Obama suggested, or from a calculated terrorist attack.  The attacks happened on the anniversary of 9/11 after all.  Does the definition of a terrorist attack rely on the attack being spontaneous?  Or can you spontaneously terrorize?  The Obama Administration was wrong about why the attacks happened; they were due to Al Qaeda involvement.  During the hearings, I saw conservatives in Congress focused on one thing, and that was the word terrorism.  We’ve figured out what caused the attacks, but instead of moving on the conservatives are ready to have another round of hearings.  Why are they politically terrorizing the Obama Administration?

On April 15thtwo bombs exploded at the Boston Marathon.   And right on cue our country started speculating on the suspects’ race and religion.  The media encouraged speculation.  I heard many conservative talking heads claim that the bomber “was a Muslim, Arab, terrorist,” before we even knew who carried out the attacks.  Likewise, many liberal talking heads were assuming or praying it was a white supremacist or at least not a Muslim.  It seems as though if a Muslim commits a violent act, the act is automatically terrorism.  But if a disgruntled white man commits a violent act, the act is a result of mental illness.  Adam Lanza killed thirty kids in the Sandy Hook massacre yet wasn’t considered a terrorist.  He killed more people than the Boston bombers and the Benghazi mob combined.  But no one’s labeling him a terrorist because being a terrorist is obviously not tied to how many people you kill.

The alleged Boston bombers are Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, who was killed during pursuit by the authorities and 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a U.S. citizen, was apprehended and held for days without charges or Miranda rights. The FBI questioned him before he was read his rights.  Tsarnev revealed that he and his brother committed the bombings because of the United State’s involvement in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.  They saw the invasions as an attack on Islam.  Which is a valid criticism.  One sect of Islam took credit for the 9/11 attacks and America seemed to go after entire countries and not the small group responsible for the attacks.  Tsarnev is not the only one offended by America’s behavior, the Iraq War offended other Americans too. 

Ultimately, the surviving Tsarnev was read his rights and charged with ‘use of a weapon of mass destruction, and with malicious destruction of property resulting in death’ in federal court.  Conservative members of Congress wanted Tsarnev charged as an unlawful military combatant to prevent due process protections, such as right to an attorney.  Tsarnev is an American, and the crime happened here so he was not charged as an unlawful military combatant.  Does that mean this wasn’t terrorism?  Even though the acts were tied to his extremist position on Islam?  I am glad, however, that they are trying him in federal court instead of a military tribunal.

Tamerlan Tsarnev body is in limbo, because no funeral home wants a terrorist buried in their plots.

Last week, Assata Shakur’s name was added as the first woman on F.B.I’s Most Wanted Terrorist List.  Shakur was a key member of the Black Panther Party, until a schism due to the Party’s lack of political education and history.  Shakur then joined the Black Liberation Army, where her activism took a darker and more violent path.  Starting in 1971 Assata Shakur was arraigned on seven various crimes, such as robbery, kidnapping, and murder.  It must be noted Shakur was only convicted in 1977 for the murder of an officer on the New Jersey Turnpike on May 2,1973.  Later in 1979 Shakur broke out of prison and fled to Cuba, where she sought asylum.

On the FBI’s website, most of the terrorist in the top ten bombed a facility or murdered multiple people within the last 35 years.  Assata is wanted for the only crime she was convicted of and breaking out of prison.
  And sure maybe Shakur would fit the definition of a terrorist, if she had been convicted of the string of crimes of which she was charged.  And we must note that there is evidence in question on whether she shot the officer on the New Jersey turnpike.  Another man was convicted of the same crime and her fingerprints were not on the weapon.  Shakur was also injured after being shot by an officer, and wouldn’t have been able to operate a weapon.  During her trial Shakur brought up the FBI’s Counter Intelligence Program “COINTELPRO”, which was a series of operations by the FBI to disrupt, and discredit political organizations, such as the Black Panther Party, Black Liberation Army or any other civil rights affiliated group.  They did so with illegal tactics such as wrongful imprisonment, harassment, assault, etc.  With the string of attempted convictions, one can only wonder if COINTELPRO was involved.  I mean who are the real terrorists in her situation?

The omission of the word terrorism has been a thorn in the Obama Administration’s side since Benghazi.  Being labeled a terrorist caused Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s to lose his rights or at least delay them.  Now Tsarnaev’s entire legal future depends on the word terrorist, just wait until jury selection.  Tamerlan Tsarnaev can’t get a proper burial because of the terrorist label.  And Assata Shakur walks the activist terrorist line convincingly.  There is a fine line between activism and terrorism.  But in many terrorists’ minds they are activists.  There too, is a fine line between a terrorist and mentally ill.  A mentally ill person can take a political message, run with it and take it to a violent place, to terrorism.  Overall, terrorism seems to get its roots from race, religion and the rhetoric surrounding it.     

Uncategorized

Previous Post



May 8, 2013

Editorial Fellowship, HuffPost Religion

Next Post



May 11, 2013 Religious Right Shuns Black Gay Athlete


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Amy Steele Andre E. Johnson Book Reviews/Series Brian Foulks Call for Chapters Carol Howard Merritt Classes Conferences Contributors Crystal St.Marie Lewis Daniel White Hodge Earle Fisher Eulogy Fredrick Robinson Guest Contributions Henry McNeal Turner Institutes Interviews Joseph Boston Katherine Whitfield Kimberly Peeler-Ringer Lectures/Roundtables Natalie Bullock Brown R3 Book Series R3 Contributor Rashad Grove Readers Reflections Symposiums Teaching Traci Ellis Travis Harris Uncategorized Video

Select a Month June 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 October 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was an omer's capacity? (Biblical Measurement)

Select your answer to see how you score.

4 quarts 1 quart 3 quarts 2 quarts

Related posts from Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

Why Christian Nationalism Betrays the Gospel

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

White People of Faith Who Affirm #BLM: How...

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

Deferred Dreams: The Consequence of Misaligned Personhood in...

Rhetoric Race and Religion

Progressive Christian

Not Training but Character

Rhetoric Race and Religion

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Brandy Anderson, Team Weird, and Transcending Church

I met author Brandy Anderson on Heretic Happy Hour, when podcaster Keith...

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube