Pulpits, Politics and PACS

Last updated on: October 8, 2012 at 9:41 pm by Andre E. Johnson

Pulpits, Politics and PACS 2012-10-08T21:41:00-05:00 Andre E. Johnson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Giovanni “Blame Girl” Neal

R3 Contributor

Religious institutions of the United States literally have the freest speech in the country. Over the past year, we’ve seen a church that wouldn’t allow interracial couples to attend their congregation. Likewise, we have heard about a church that refused to perform a marriage ceremony for a black couple. In our country we have a church whose URL address is godhatesfags.com; and the very same church protests our soldier’s funerals. Religious institutions can even undermine education and science with their own creationism museums. However, they are prohibited in one area, and that is in political speech.

So why can’t religious institutions address our political campaigns? The difference between a church and an individual is that churches have the protection of free speech and pay no taxes. This prohibition lies in the 501(c)(3) status. The law is that “in exchange for the receipt of tax-exempt status, Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 501(c)(3) absolutely prohibits churches and other tax-exempt organizations from campaigning for or against a candidate for public office.”

It is not just churches that cannot endorse a candidate, but any organization seeking tax-exempt status. They give up their political speech in exchange for money. But if you look at corporations and unions, they too have restrictions on their free speech. Corporations may not directly contribute to a candidate from their treasury funds or a business account. However, there is always a loophole. Both corporations and churches have the option to form a 501(c)(4) PAC and they can circumvent the restriction on their political speech and support a candidate. Even though they cannot directly support candidates in politics, they can indirectly show their support.

The 1954 law, pushed by Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson, could be seen as unconstitutional by many. But does it really hurt religious freedom? Perhaps if the IRS enforced it, it could be seen as a violation of free speech. This past Sunday, one thousand churches broke the law to participate in what is known as “Pulpit Freedom Sunday.” They endorsed a candidate from the churches platform, from ‘God’s’ platform. These ‘tax-evaders’ will more than likely never be brought to justice.

Though Pulpit Freedom Sunday is in its fifth year, yet churches have a long history of political involvement. Black Churches have a history of heavily influencing politics since the Civil Rights Movement, yet never had the threat of I.R.C. § 501(c)(3) being enforced. In fact a church’s 501(c)(3) status wasn’t actually revoked until the 1990’s when The Church at Pierce Creek in Binghamton, NY took out ads in the Washington Times and USA Today criticizing Bill Clinton’s stance on abortion and homosexuality. An appellate court upheld the law then, saying it violated neither the Establishment Clause nor the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. It was upheld on the grounds that for such burden to be unconstitutional, it must put “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs”. Yet we still have Pulpit Freedom Sundays of which videos of the political sermons are mailed to the IRS, yet the IRS doesn’t dare enforce the law. If the IRS would enforce the rule, that would give churches yet another opportunity to pursue litigation and have the rule thrown out as unconstitutional.

The law was created by LBJ to prevent the church from shaping public policy. There is a danger in blindly taking a leader’s free speech as absolute, even more so when it’s a religious leader’s speech. However, if churches can spew rhetoric that rivals Al Qaeda and allow marriages to occur according to pre-Civil war standards, then doesn’t that indirectly shape public policy?

On one hand I think churches should be able to be as free as they’d like with their speech, but on the other hand I wonder what it would be like to see churches like Westborough Baptist, among others prosecuted for tax evasion.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 8, 2012

Live Tweeting the Vice Presidential Debate

Next Post

October 9, 2012 Faith in pluralistic America’s politics — those who use it, misuse it and attack it

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Amy Steele Andre E. Johnson Book Reviews/Series Brian Foulks Call for Chapters Carol Howard Merritt Classes Conferences Contributors Crystal St.Marie Lewis Daniel White Hodge Earle Fisher Eulogy Fredrick Robinson Guest Contributions Henry McNeal Turner Institutes Interviews Joseph Boston Katherine Whitfield Kimberly Peeler-Ringer Lectures/Roundtables Natalie Bullock Brown R3 Book Series R3 Contributor Rashad Grove Readers Reflections Symposiums Teaching Traci Ellis Travis Harris Uncategorized Video

Select a Month June 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 October 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz