Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Religio et Pietas

Mos Maiorum

Last updated on: June 7, 2011 at 4:27 pm   by M. Horatius Piscinus

Mos Maiorum 2011-06-07T16:27:28-04:00 M. Horatius Piscinus

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tradition is never static. It flows with many currents in and around obstructions, sometimes even in contradictory directions. Little pools may form at high water, becoming separated later from the main stream, just as sects may break off from a tradition, only to stagnate and eventually dry up, but the mainstream tradition continues to evolve, adapt, adopt as it moves further on. Rather than looking backward on a fixed time in the history of a religious tradition, often time it is the tradition itself that becomes the mechanism of innovation. Living according to tradition does not mean doing things in exactly the same way as had been done generations earlier. Religious tradition is not a unchanging set of beliefs, nor is it a set of rituals to be rigidly followed. Religion is a way of life. As such, it tends to evolve along with the life of its community. In the religio Romana we call our tradition the mos Maiorum, or “the way of the ancestors.” Just as today’s Jewish communities may look to their legends in the texts they preserved, we look at the legends and histories of Livius and Tacitus, the works of Ovidius, Plinius, and Valerius Maximus, and especially the works of Vergilius Maro, as well as later commentaries on such works, as these now preserve what was once the mos Maiorum.

Lar Augustalis

Lar Augustalis

The first thing to understand about the Religio Romana is that it originated from an ecstatic tradition. The legendary founder of our tradition, Numa Pompilius, consulted Egeria while establishing the religious institutions of Rome. She was said to have been a nymph in the sacred grove Carmenta at the foot of the Capitoline Hill. Or perhaps Egeria was a priestess of Carmenta, one of the vates who communicated with the Gods while under trance in the same way as Albunea, the White Sibyl, or like the Sibyl of Cumae, or even as Carmenta herself had done. Egeria instructed Numa on how to invoke the Gods in order that They might instruct him Themselves. The legends are very clear that Numa consulted Egeria in his dreams, and he invoked the Gods during incubation rites. He withdrew himself into sacred groves near a spring, to perform his sacrifices before lying down to receive visions by which the Gods instructed him on what festivals to hold, when to hold them, what rituals to perform, and what sacrifices to offer. That is, Numa Pompilius is credited with first establishing the Roman ritual calendar, the rituals to be performed on festival days, and instituting the various priesthoods in sacerdotal colleges that oversaw the calendar and rituals to benefit the Roman state. He set these instructions down as religious laws directly from the Gods for those who would follow after him.  In this Numa was like Moses receiving the laws of his Adonai and like Mohammed when he was instructed by Allah. In a sense, too, Numa Pompilius represents the transition from the ecstatic tradition in which women played the major role to an established male-dominated priesthood for the Roman state. In this the legends of Numa parallel developments in India with the establishment of the Brahmans, represented in the Upanishads, over the earlier Rig Veda where women played a larger role in an ecstatic tradition. Likewise, the Roman state religion came later to emphasize ritual formality with a need for specialists in ritual forms, just as occurred with the Brahmans. The Roman state continued certain rituals even after they had forgotten the meaning of the words spoken during the rituals.

This leads me to point out two errors that I have seen in historical descriptions of the religio Romana and in attempts to reconstruct its tradition. First, and perhaps most importantly, is the neglect and sometimes the rejection of the role of women in the religio Romana. Secondly is a neglect and often times the rejection of the ecstatic element of the tradition. The latter may be due to an unfamiliarity with trance and ecstatic traditions. The first error is due in part to our available sources being male authors, our historians primarily being male in centuries past, and to the prejudices of the Christian copyists who preserved the ancient texts. Both errors, though, result from the focus that has been placed on the state religion of Rome without considering the state religion in context with the religio populi Romana itself. The state religion could certainly influence developments in the religious practices of the people of Rome. Augustus was able to reorganize the City into vici, replacing the older curiae, and introduce the Lares Augustales into the neighborhood shrine of a vicus. Bronze statues and painted images of the Lares Augustales appear in private homes. But much more often, throughout the Republican eras at least, the driving force behind the evolution of the traditions of Rome arose from the people. This included foreign cults adopted by patrician families, as with Castor and Pollux and with the rites of Hercules at the Ara Maxima. It included the eventual acceptance by the patricians of the plebeian religious institutions into the state religion, along with acceptance of plebeians into the state’s sacerdotal colleges by 300 BCE, and continued with further developments as more people entered into the plebeian ranks, bringing along their own Italic traditions. There was the adoption of private temples and altars, as with the Temple of the Bona Dea that was founded privately at first by Vestal Virgin Licinia, and later reinstituted by Livia Julia Augusta. And again there was the state’s adoption of private games like the Ludi Terentini that Augustus transformed into the Ludi Saeculares. Also an important factor in changes to Rome’s religious traditions was the army. Victorious generals vowed new temples and games, and at times carried off foreign deities whom they installed in Rome. Thus the Etruscan Goddess Vei was installed as Juno Regina on the Aventine and the Carthaginian Goddess Tanit was led to Rome as another Juno Regina, where as Juno Sospita had previously been the protective Goddess of a Latin city. From very early in Rome’s history merchants, both native and foreign, likewise introduced new deities, new forms of cultus, and new ideas that percolated up through the Roman populace to evolve the state’s religions all the more.

The Roman state’s religious institutions may be the most visible in the ruins of its edifices and in the few records to survive. While these may serve as a traditional guide on some aspects of what was once the mos Maiorum they are as unrelated to the modern reconstruction of the Religio Romana among cultores Deorum as the regulations on temple sacrifices in the historical cultus of Jerusalem is to today’s Judaism. The Book of Jubilees, the Vayikra (Leviticus), and Bamidbar (Numbers) preserve practices of the past and thus provide some insight into Judaic traditions, but not to Jewish practice of today. In the same way we should look at the mos Maiorum as a way of gaining insight into the Roman tradition, but the application of the tradition will necessarily have to apply to today’s circumstances. There is no longer a Roman Empire, and thus the imperial cults and the state apparatus no longer apply to modern cultores Deorum Romanorum. Stripped of those elements, what remains is the religion of hearth and home, of the family, and of small communities of cultores Deorum.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



June 2, 2011

First Sunday

Next Post



June 9, 2011 Vestalia


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 November 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 October 2011 August 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the last plague of Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Darkness Biting insects and wild animals Water turned into blood Death of the firstborn

Related posts from Religio et Pietas

Pagan

Morning Prayers

Religio et Pietas

Pagan

What Really Happens When We Die?

Religio et Pietas

Pagan

We Are Not Forgiven

Religio et Pietas

Pagan

Is There Really a Devil?

Religio et Pietas

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Pagan

The Twelve Deities

When we talk about Greek religion, we often begin with the dodekatheion—the...

What do the Gods Look Like?

I was recently chatting with someone on Instagram. She asked me what...

My Blogging Style

While there are many people who share their results, the end of...

The Odyssey

On July 23, I saw Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey which is Homer’s...

Work in progress

As I write this two big events have just finished up. One...

Restoring the Watershed of Divine Love

Perhaps cooperation is not something we manufacture through legislation, ideology, or moral...

view all Pagan blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube