Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Religio et Pietas

Chimera: Misunderstanding Myth

Last updated on: March 29, 2011 at 6:25 am   by M. Horatius Piscinus

Chimera: Misunderstanding Myth 2011-03-29T06:25:29-04:00 M. Horatius Piscinus

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Sunday I came upon an article concerning the discovery last December of the archaeological remains of a house in Nazareth.  The discovery was received with much enthusiasm by the Mary of Nazareth Association.  “The discovery is significant. Up till then, there was no scientific evidence affirming the existence of a village of Nazareth of the epoch of Christ.”

http://www.h2onews.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=224448513

They are assuming, first, that one building proves the existence of a village, where no other evidence of inhabitation has been found after so many years of searching. Then, too, the pottery they used to date their find places the house before 67 BCE, which was when Pompeius Magna entered Judea.  Apparently it did not occur to them yet to ask why there are not any later remains from this site, why was there nothing found that would indeed place a community at Nazareth in the first century of the common era? The find of one house does not prove what the authors hope to prove, nor has the lack of discoveries disproved anything.

It seems that this sect needs physical proof that their myths are tied to geographical places and to historical times as though that somehow makes their stories more real than the myths of other religions. I noticed, too, in Bill Maher’s film Religulous (2008) how he had focused on the myths of the Bible as being obviously untrue.  Several times, for example, he referred to the “talking snake” of the garden. Interesting to me was when Mr. Maher questioned an individual at a Biblical theme park who was dressed to look like an image of Jesus. He tells the man of the similarity of the myths about Jesus with those of Krishna, Mithra, and Horus.

Bill Maher: “But the Jesus story wasn’t original.”
Man at The Holy Land Experience: “How so? ”
Bill Maher: “Written in 1280 BC, The Book of the Dead describes a God, Horus… Horus is the son of the god Osiris… born to a virgin mother. He was baptized in a river by Anup the Baptizer… who was later beheaded. Like Jesus, Horus was tempted while alone in the desert… Healed the sick… The blind… Cast out demons… And walked on water… He raised Asar from the dead. ‘Asar’ translates to ‘Lazarus’. Oh yeah, he also had 12 disciples. Yes, Horus was crucified first… And after 3 days, two women announced… Horus, the savior of humanity… had been resurrected.”

Maher’s approach is simple and naive. ‘If the myths are not real, then neither can God be real.’

What a strange idea? And a very different approach towards myth. Two-thousand and fifty-five years ago a senator of Rome, Cicero, wrote, “In every other case we see the fictitious and unfounded opinions have dwindled away over the lapse of time. Who believes that the hippocentaur or the chimera ever existed? Where can you find an old wife senseless enough to be afraid of the monsters of the lower world that were once believed in (Natura Deorum II. 5)?”

It is not at all strange to me to find similar myths exist in different cultures. In addition to Krishna, Mithra, and Horus, Maher could have easily point to Tammuz, the Adonis born in a grotto at Bethlehem later claimed as the birth place  of Jesus, on the same date, the winter solstice in that time, or to have pointed to Orpheus who is portrayed as the Savior (soter) who died on a cross, like Pales of north Africa and many others. Parallels can be found even in myths of the Americans where the Twins descend into the Underworld, die, and resurrect. Or one might look into Eliade’s Shamanism to learn how the theme of death and rebirth relates to shamanic initiation in many cultures. Just like Bill Maher, a Christian once approached me and tried to “disprove” the Greco-Roman myths, I assume to promote his own myths over those of my tradition. But like Maher and many others, believers and doubters, they have no understanding of myth itself. There are many such stories as those told about Rama  and Jesus, because myths relate to the human condition and not to any one person.

I think it was Plutarch who wrote that myths tell the story of the journey of the human soul.  Myths are intended to be allegorical. Well, some myths. There are actually different reasons as to why myths arrive. While there are many studies that have been made on mythology, Fritz Graf  of Ohio State University offers a brief explanation on the history of modern analysis of myth in his own Greek Mythology: An Introduction (1993).  Plutarch, in my opinion, has the right idea that myths cannot be taken literally and must instead be understood as applying to everyone.  Whether one reads the Poimandres or the Popul Vue, the story is not just that one individual divinity manifested into the physical world like Krishna, was born, nailed to a cross as it were to hold his spiritual being to a physical body like Orpheus, the body later dying to release his spirit as with Hercules on the flaming wheel of the zodiac, or as though resurrecting from a cave or a stone like Mithra, descending into the Underworld like Ishtar, stripped of Her seven veils just as the divine in Poimandres is captured by seven planetary layers, then to rise, ascend back into the heavens to be recognized as a god or a goddess at the right hand of the Gods.  The mysteries taught that we are all Jesus in a sense; his very name, from the Greek letters, signifying the cross formed by axes of the zodiac that ensnares the divinity in all of us into a physical form. We are all children of the divine after all, and all destined eventually to return to our home among the Gods, to become a god ourselves.

Cicero, who scoffed at the notion of anyone believing in such monsters as a chimera, also wrote The Dream of Scipio, where Scipio returns from death to tell us what awaits all of us.  As in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, the stars above, shining along the Milky Way, are the light of houses along the celestial Via Sacra where heroes, like Scipio, live near the abode of the Gods.  It was an allegorical story in its way, and also related more  to reality than some take their myths to be, since our bodies are in fact made of stardust and shall, I assume, return to the stars in a physical sense someday.  And if there is more to us than just biochemistry and physics, as I firmly believe there is, then the divine within all of us shall journey on, progress, and evolve, towards returning to the Gods from which our true selves, our Authentic Being, descended into life and shall be born again upon death, resurrected into a divine life once more.  The truth of the myth does not lie in the story of Poimandres or of any other hero, but in speaking with our personal Poimandres, the divine within ourselves.

Myth moves, evolves in the telling, adapts to changing circumstances. Myth is organic, just as its subject is organic. How odd, then, that believers and doubters alike should become so hung up on the myths themselves, trying to prove or disprove the allegorical surface as though they were historical facts, when the message lies beneath.  Somehow in battling over myth they have been caught in the gaze of the multi-headed, multiform chimera – the very image of chaotic matter, and have forgotten what resulted with Bellarophon when his hubris got the better of him and he was cast down before ever reaching the heights of Olympus.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 25, 2011

Sacella: The Little Shrines

Next Post



April 4, 2011 Beliefs: That the Gods of Ancient Rome Exist Today


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 November 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 October 2011 August 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

My reign brought prosperity until pride led me to burn incense in the temple, resulting in leprosy. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Hezekiah Uzziah Asa

Related posts from Religio et Pietas

Pagan

Morning Prayers

Religio et Pietas

Pagan

What Really Happens When We Die?

Religio et Pietas

Pagan

We Are Not Forgiven

Religio et Pietas

Pagan

Is There Really a Devil?

Religio et Pietas

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Pagan

Beating My Voting Drum

Here comes a rant (and TLDR: if you're a US citizen eligible...

Why are younger seekers drawn to Paganism and...

One of the things I've noticed the most is that I'm far...

The Twelve Deities

When we talk about Greek religion, we often begin with the dodekatheion—the...

What do the Gods Look Like?

I was recently chatting with someone on Instagram. She asked me what...

The Odyssey

On July 23, I saw Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey which is Homer’s...

Work in progress

As I write this two big events have just finished up. One...

view all Pagan blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube