Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Jewish
Religion News
Question: How do scholars explain bloodthirsty Bible passages?

Question: How do scholars explain bloodthirsty Bible passages?

Last updated on: March 31, 2023 at 11:42 am by Richard Ostling

0 Comments

Question: How do scholars explain bloodthirsty Bible passages? 2023-03-31T11:42:26-04:00 Richard Ostling

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER:

Skeptics seeking to disparage the Bible and, with it, Judaism and Christianity, cite certain passages in the Bible that depict all-out warfare as mandated by God. Consider Israel’s “conquest” of Canaan under Joshua, and a notably bloodthirsty passage like Deuteronomy 20:16-17, which says “you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall utterly destroy them. . . as the LORD your God has commanded.”

There’s been intriguing recent discussion of this complex issue. Even conservative evangelicals, who defend the Bible’s historical accuracy, are reinterpreting such passages, as we’ll see.

Ruins at Jericho, where Israel’s “conquest” began / Valdemaras D. Unsplash.com

“Etz Hayim: Torah and Commentary,” issued by Judaism’s Conservative branch, freely admits a modern reader “recoils” from a demand to wipe out a population group. It says the context is the Canaanites’ “abhorrent” deeds. Verse 18 goes on to explain combat is necessary so “they may not teach you to do according to all their abominable practices which they have done in the service of their gods.” Commentaries think ritual sacrifice of children was a major part of this. The context of such verses is said to be “the Torah’s abiding fear that these pagan nations will lead Israel astray.”

Here’s another part of the context. Risking anymilitary advantage from surprise, Joshua informed Canaanites in advance about the invasion plan so they could flee from bloodshed, and he first offered a peace settlement before resorting to combat. (That was relatively humane for the cruel culture 3,000 years ago.) The same point is underscored by a classic source in Orthodox Judaism, the “Pentateuch & Haftorahs” compiled by Britain’s longtime chief rabbi, J.H. Hertz.

This Orthodox commentary also observes that the Israelites’ need for a homeland is part of all human history, including for most western nations. Israel added to that the “ethical justification” of countering Canaan’s “depravity” as with human sacrifice. Moreover, “the whole moral and spiritual future of mankind was involved.”

Reform Judaism’s official commentary says Joshua’s forces did not in fact annihilate the Canaanite population even though that “would not have offended against the usual practice of the times.” Instead, it thinks the Bible’s words were a “retrospective command,” written long after the fact, to say if Israel had done this “you would not have lapsed into idolatry.” Ancient military events were always interpreted “as manifestations of God’s will,” and — notably — the Bible assailed not just other nations but Israel itself.

Also, according to the Jewish Bible (Christians’ Old Testament), God’s will on warfare is complex. The great King David was forbidden to build God’s Temple because his wars shed too much blood (1 Chronicles 22:8) and nearly lost his realm for conducting a military census (2 Samuel 24). God rebuked Simon and Levi for slaughtering Canaanites (Genesis 49:5-7). And so forth.

In Christian interpretations, minority pacifists say Jesus’ preaching of love forbids all war-making by believers. Meanwhile, liberals and skeptics may dismiss the narratives as nationalistic propaganda not to be taken literally. Catholic exegete Tommy Lane of Mount St. Mary’s Seminary thinks “Israel misunderstood and misjudged God” in these Scriptures!

Well, what about Bible-defending conservative Protestants? Books that ponder these difficult passages include “Did God Really Command Genocide?” (Baker, 2014) by ethicists Paul Copan and Matthew Flannagan, and “Holy War in the Bible” (InterVarsity, 2013), an anthology edited by Copan, philosopher Jeremy Evans, and Old Testament scholar Heath Thomas. An article by Thomas, formerly director of doctoral studies at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and now theology dean at Oklahoma Baptist University, summarized major points as follows.

First, the few verses about wiping out populations use the “exaggerated” rhetoric that occur in all war stories from ancient times. Second, the Bible put far more emphasis on dispossessing Canaanites from the land than on killing. Third (as above), God’s primary concern was not obliteration but “resolute” moral opposition to Canaan’s idolatry and sin. Fourth, God waited patiently 400 years before the conquest re-established the inheritance of the Holy Land dating from Abraham’s time.

Finally, commentaries say the singular conquest set no precedent for later Christianity, which teaches creation of God’s kingdom through love, not coercion. “These wars were fought in a particular time and are neither to be repeated by the Church nor to be justified for any peoples” today, Thomas insists.

Adding to the discussion is the brand-new “Flood and Fury: Old Testament Violence and the Shalom of God” (www.ivpress.com/flood-and-fury) by Matthew J. Lynch, an evangelical Bible scholar at Regent College in Vancouver, Canada. As the title indicates, Lynch deals not only with the conquest of Canaan but the destruction in the Flood of Noah, which The Guy sidesteps in this item for simplicity’s sake.

Lynch candidly admits there’s no solid consensus answering the problem of God’s direction and Old Testament violence, or on how to “resolve the moral tensions” involved but careful reconsideration can help. His own unconventional interpretation says the Book of Joshua mingles a “majority report” depicting military advances – perhaps a “re-telling of a popular conquest story” long after the actual events — with a skeptical “minority report” in which God “bursts any militaristic bubble” and requires a “heavy dose of kindness toward foreigners, strangers, and outsiders.”

Instead of some mighty military “conquest,” he writes, the Bible itself portrays an “incomplete and gradual” development of Israel’s control of the land, paying special attention to Joshua’s farewell address in the Book of Joshua chapters 23 nd 24.

Equally important is the 2017 tome “The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest” (www.ivpress.com/the-lost-world-of-the-israelite-conquest), co-authored by John H. Walton of Wheaton College (Illinois) and formerly at the Moody Bible Institute, with his son J. Harvey.

The Waltons say that unlike modern histories, in context the Old Testament war narratives employ symbolism and hyperbole that ancient readers would have understood as such. Though modern readers above all crave human happiness, they observe, in chaotic ancient times the greatest good was “establishing and sustaining order” as with Israel consolidating its Holy Land regime.

In a crucial technicality, the Waltons dispute the usual translation of the key Hebrew term herem as a command to “utterly destroy” a population. Rather, they argue, this means to remove or make something off limits for human use, which in this context meant that flight by Canaanites was morally preferable to combat.

Jewish

General Christian

History and Religion

Previous Post

March 16, 2023

Question: What is Sikhism, candidate Nikki Haley's onetime religion?

Next Post

April 12, 2023 Question: "Why have many worshippers stopped singing in church"?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"(First off, a correction: telescopes were invented about 1,300 years after Ptolemy's death.)Skeptics have been ..."

Ray Ingles

UFO buzz: Will life on distant ..."

"NIPs... spurn labels and are averse to “organized religion” with its expectations about moral lifestyles ..."

Ray Ingles

How do categories differ among America’s ..."

"Atheists are those who are certain God does not exist, and the same for all ..."

Brian Westley

How do categories differ among America’s ..."

"We already know what happens, Christianity is the only worldview that has completely answered all ..."

Lekrikrekral

Why doesn’t the Bible mention dinosaurs?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian denomination places great emphasis on "justification by faith alone"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Orthodox Lutherans Methodists Catholics