What was the worst misuse of the Bible in history?

Last updated on: February 2, 2019 at 3:24 pm by Richard Ostling

What was the worst misuse of the Bible in history? 2019-02-02T15:24:57-05:00 Richard Ostling

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

THE QUESTION:

Across the ages, what passage in the Bible was the subject of the most heinous misinterpretation and application?

THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER:

Without doubt, the answer is Genesis 9:18-27. The use of those verses as biblical support for black slavery was “devastating, and patently false,” says David M. Goldenberg, who wrote the important studies “The Curse of Ham” (2005) and “Black and Slave” (2017). Black History Month is an appropriate season to contemplate a perverse biblical claim long perpetrated by various Christians, Jews and, from a different tradition, Muslims.

This Genesis passage, aptly called “obscure” and “enigmatic” by scholars, records a sordid incident in primeval times. After surviving the great Flood, Noah planted grapes and then (possibly by mistake) became drunk with wine. As Noah lay uncovered in a stupor, his son Ham “saw the nakedness of his father” and reported this to his brothers Shem and Japheth, who then took care to cover Noah without looking upon his naked body.

When Noah awoke and learned what had happened, he cursed Ham’s son Canaan, saying “a slave of slaves shall he be to his brothers.” So this was not a “curse of Ham” so often spoken of, but upon Noah’s grandson Canaan. We are not told that God cursed Canaan, only that Noah did so. Noah then asked God to bless his sons Shem and Japheth while omitting Ham, but God had previously blessed all three brothers equally (Genesis 9:1).

“The Bible says nothing about skin color in the story of Noah,” Goldenberg observes, and others agree. Analysts differ on the geography and ethnicity that might be indicated in the genealogy that follows in Genesis chapter 10 but do agree on one obvious point. The Bible identified Canaan as the ancestor of the Canaanites, Israel’s pagan rivals. The family line in Genesis 11:10-31 designated another of Noah’s sons, Shem, as the ancestor of Abraham and thus the Israelites, as he was also to be of Ishmael and the Arabs.

There’s a strong consensus that the slavery curse referred to Canaan’s eventual submission to Israel (whether a prophecy about the future or, in the liberal view, a polemic against Canaan that was written later). Evangelical exegete Meredith Kline added the important point that the curse “does not apply to all members of the ethnic groups represented by the individual.” Instead of racial divisions, Orthodox Judaism’s Pentateuch & Haftorahs commentary says this passage as a whole teaches “the unity of the human race,” and so does the Catholic Study Bible.

Ham was guilty of disrespecting a parent, an important breach of biblical propriety. But it’s a mystery why viewing a father’s nakedness and not covering him would be grounds for a curse with such a harsh punishment as servitude. G. Gunther Plaut and Nahum Sarna noted the longstanding Jewish tradition that the succinct narrative omitted detail on some abominable deed such as sexual molestation or incest or, as a rabbi in the Talmud suggested, castration. To Plaut, the “ancient Israelites doubtlessly understood” that the Bible implied something on this order.

One reason for a sexual interpretation is the telltale phrases “saw the nakedness” and “covered the nakedness” of Noah. This is terminology the sexual commandments of Leviticus 18 employ to define incest. As Plaut commented, Genesis was depicting the Canaanites as descendants of “deviates” who were renowned for sexual perversion, which “has nothing to do with race.”

In a recent wrinkle, three Israeli scholars reported that a Dead Sea Scrolls text renders Genesis 9:27 as “land of Shem” rather than the customary “tent of Shem.” They think that suggests Canaan was cursed for defying Noah’s division of the lands.

Another question is why Noah hurled the curse at grandson Canaan rather than Ham, who committed the offense. The Bible does not say. Scholars have proposed that God could not revoke the prior blessing given to Ham along with his two brothers. Or, given the power of ancient family bonds and reputation, Ham was in fact cursed — in the behavior and reputation of his accursed son.

Or, though the Bible doesn’t say so, did Canaan accompany father Ham in gazing at Noah and not bothering to cover him? Or might Canaan have participated in a supposed deed the biblical writer deemed too unspeakable to name? Or this: Noah “knew what his youngest son had done to him,” so yet another theory contends that “youngest son” meant the youngest offspring involved, namely grandson Canaan, was guilty of the deed.

Canaan aside, it was Ham’s son Cush who was identified with black Africa (for example, “Cushite” and “Ethiopian” were used interchangeably in texts of Jeremiah 13:23). If Cush was the ancestor or symbol of black Africans, he was neither cursed nor subservient.

In light of all the above, why did humiliation toward the black race emerge in tandem with justification for slavery? Here’s a mere sketch of the complex history examined by Goldenberg and others. Early Christian writers speculated on the origin of the black race but did not regard Africans or black slaves as descendants of Ham. But in ancient Mideast culture, slavery came to be associated with black Africans. Over the centuries black skin was linked with the supposed “curse of Ham” by Christian, Jewish and Muslim writers.

In later commercial history, slave proprietors exploited such racial mythology to prop up support for the economy of chattel slavery. The belief that black skin was a divine curse, Goldenberg writes, “justified and helped to keep in place a system of brutal enslavement of millions of black African people over centuries.”

Such thinking persisted in modern times, and not just among western and Muslim backers of slavery. For instance, Latter-day Saints scripture (see Moses 7:8) was interpreted as a racial curse on Canaan and (without defining this as the reason) all prophets barred those of African descent from most church posts from the 1850s till 1978. Southern Baptist missionary Eliza Thomas writes that a black Tutsi minority employed the Ham myth to claim racial superiority over a Hutu majority, a factor behind the slaughter of 800,000 in Rwanda’s 1994 civil war.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 11, 2019

How and why will your New Testaments be changing in the computer era?

Next Post

February 7, 2019 Was the New Testament’s Simon Magus a true believer or a fraud?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian principle is in "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Never forgive Always judge The Golden Rule Keep to yourself