Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

religionprof

Review, Mandaean Symbolic Art

Last updated on: December 15, 2025 at 8:29 am   by James F. McGrath

0 Comments

Review, Mandaean Symbolic Art 2025-12-13T18:38:04-05:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It is impossible to overstate how important Sandra van Rompaey’s book Mandaean Symbolic Art is. It is common to quote Ecclesiastes to the effect that the making of books there is no end. Mandaean Symbolic Art is the rare and precious instance of a kind of book that has never been written before. Let me be unambiguously clear on this, as the author of a rather distinctive book, inasmuch as many said that writing a biography of John the Baptist was impossible. There had nonetheless been many academic books about John the Baptist, and many fictionalized lives of John the Baptist. In stark contrast, there has never been any sort of study of Mandaean art as such, much less a serious academic one. As someone who hopes and advocates for scholars to stop neglecting the Mandaeans and their texts, the publication of this book is simply thrilling.

Based on her PhD thesis on the subject at La Trobe University, Mandaean Symbolic Art is a beautiful book, one of the rare books that more than merits the high price tag on so many academic books from European academic presses such as Brepols. There are so many photos of Mandaean scrolls with their unique artwork, as well as other scenes from Mandaean life, that this solid academic book can double as a coffee table book. Even the tiny glimpse inside provided by Brepols, the volume’s publisher, will surely be enough to make clear why I have described the book in that way, as well as why I am so excited by its publication and why this subject is long overdue for academic attention.

I first met the author in 2013 at the ARAM conference on the Mandaeans, which was my own very first foray into this area that would become a major research focus of mine (unbeknownst to me at the time). It was already clear to me then (once I realized that a nearly comprehensive gathering of all scholars who work on the Mandaeans in any time and from any angle could fit in a small seminar room) that van Rompaey was the only scholar of the visual arts giving attention to the very distinctive artwork in a number of Mandaean scrolls. That there would eventually be a book was hinted at then. I have thus been in eager anticipation of this book’s appearance for more than a decade. If in one sense a study like this was long overdue, van Rompaey’s book was well worth the wait.

No photo description available.

Right from the outset, van Rompaey emphasizes why the Mandaean illustrated (or if you prefer to use the terminology of the Christian tradition, illuminated) manuscripts are important. She writes, “the iconography of Mandaean art, reveals a body of art encompassing nine manuscripts that is stylistically coherent and unique in its method of representing key elements of Gnostic thought” (p.11). The interplay of text and image in these manuscripts is crucial to the meaning of both, and in turn clarifies things in other Mandaean texts. Striking parallels and points of comparison are noted already in the preface between the art in these manuscripts and some of the artwork (fascinating in its own right) at Dura-Europos (p.12). The author describes the characteristic features of the illustrations in the scrolls, making clear why “criteria derived from the European aesthetic tradition are of little help in interpreting such work” (p.19). The symbolism of the artwork is very deliberately both esoteric and meaningful. The manuscripts under discussion include many that are unpublished. As an aside, I saw (early in my work on Mandaean literature) a copy of one of E. S. Drower’s editions of a Mandaean text listed for sale on Amazon from a used bookseller. When it arrived, I discovered that it was not the translation in book form but the facsimile of the two scrolls themselves (The Greater First World and The Lesser First World). This tube is one of my cherished possessions and I delight in showing it to fellow academics as well as students when an appropriate moment arises. I have also had the opportunity to see a full-sized scroll of Diwan Abatur in person in the Bodleian Library in Oxford as well as the home of the Mubaraki family in Australia.

Among the many things never undertaken prior to van Rompaey’s book is a comparison of the slight but in her view significant differences between the illustrations in different manuscripts of the Diwan Abatur, arguably the most famous Mandaean illustrated scroll (p.22). The book also tackles for the first time the relationship between the figures in the scrolls and those depicted in Mandaean incantation bowls. In the process of comparing illustrations in the scrolls to not only Mandaean texts but current and recent Mandaean practice, it became clear both how impressive is the continuity while the differences are also significant and worthy of close investigation by scholars.

If you have the budget and are interested in this topic then get a copy. Otherwise, do what European academic publishers’ pricing model expects you to do: recommend it to your library, have them purchase it, and then borrow it from there.

I shared above my photo of visiting with the Mubaraki family and seeing their scroll. Here is a photo I took of myself showing my facsimile of a Mandaean scroll to students in my class. They were fascinated but also clearly not used to dealing with this unusual show and tell scenario.

No photo description available.

In case you’re wondering why I blogged about this twice, the answer is that I apparently started a review of van Rompaey’s book and then forgot about it and started another one!

Here are a couple of other relevant posts.

Mandaean Illustrated Scroll Talk and Exhibit

Musical Hell

 

More Voices

Religious Art

art

book review

Mandaeans

art

illuminated

illustrated

Mandaeans

Sandra van Rompaey

scrolls

Previous Post



December 13, 2025

Eternal Conscious Torment and Evangelical Gatekeeping

Next Post



December 24, 2025 Journey to Bethlehem

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"And to you!"

James F. McGrath


Make Evangelicalism Christian Again

"Thank You, I identify as "strange" wink, wink! Anyway, at this point we're not going ..."

Burke S


Make Evangelicalism Christian Again

"You are such a strange individual and so difficult to have a conversation with. You ..."

James F. McGrath


Make Evangelicalism Christian Again

"What you're suggesting citing these "rabbinical" interpretations you're favoring are just that - interpretations. There ..."

Burke S


Make Evangelicalism Christian Again


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Jude James Peter

Books by This Author Books by James F. McGrath

See All Titles »

Related posts from Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath

Family

Cinematic Bible Time

Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath

Family

The Fourth Synoptic Gospel

Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath

Family

The Obsolete Paradigm of a Purely Mythical Jesus

Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath

Family

A Religion Scholar's Rome Recommendations

Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Bear One Another’s Burdens, But Carry Your Own...

At first glance, Paul seems to contradict himself within the span of...

A Catholic Century or an Evangelical Century?

Will the form of Christianity that prevails in the years ahead be...

Crying in the Kitchen: When My Body Finally...

It was still dark when I found myself dancing in the kitchen...

'I Play Rocky': A Two-Fisted Tale of Hope...

Amazon MGM's 'I Play Rocky' recreates the making of the 1976 blockbuster...

Beautiful Durham-- Part Four

Here's our band of pilgrims on Palace Green facing the Castle and...

Executions?: Hold the Pen Still, Byron Donalds

Byron Donalds, You Can Hold the Pen Still Florida executed nineteen people...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube