Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Time Travelling Apologist

Time Travelling Apologist

Last updated on: October 30, 2025 at 2:30 pm by James F. McGrath

0 Comments

Time Travelling Apologist 2025-10-30T14:30:27-04:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

TIME TRAVELLING APOLOGIST

Episode I

VOICEOVER with theme music: Welcome to the Apologist News Hour, your home for reporting that is 100% biblical. With your host Ian Luegner.

HOST: Hello everyone and God bless you. Today we welcome a very special guest, Prof. Kenneth Jambon, who has been working on an incredible scientific project that seeks to provide definitive scientific evidence to confirm the details of the Bible and thus of your faith. Prof. Jambon, welcome to the show.

JAMBON: It is a pleasure to be here. Thank you for this chance to share my work with the faithful and to help build up their faith.

HOST: So tell the audience, what is it that you’ve been working on?

JAMBON: I have – I know it will be hard to believe, but you’ll see the proof in just a few moments – I have developed a working time machine.

HOST: That’s truly remarkable. As a Bible-believing Christian, what motivated you to do this research?

JAMBON: Well of course my real aim is not science for its own sake but apologetics.

HOST: Of course. For our audience, what is the relevance of time travel research to apologetics.

JAMBON: Eventually I want to capture the resurrection on video, but that will take some careful planning and equipment. So I thought I’d start with something just a bit smaller. Those wicked liberal scholars – you know, the kind one finds at places like Theology Beer Camp – are always talking about differences and even contradictions between the Gospels. You and I both know they’re wrong, but by golly, sometimes figuring out how the Gospels are supposed to fit together is a real head stumper even when you know for sure ahead of time that they’ve got to. So I decided to go back and get the authors of the four Gospels, and get them to explain it to us themselves.

HOST (shocked): Wait, did you say you got them? I assumed you went back to talk to them in the past.

JAMBON: I thought it would make more sense to bring them here, give you a chance to hear them in their own words. Besides, portable automatic translation isn’t as good as what is available in a studio like yours, and so bringing them here also gives us a chance to talk to them in a way that I couldn’t when I kidnapp…um, I mean, when I extended the invitation to them. Would you like to meet them? I’ve brought them with me.

HOST (to camera): Well, this is going to be a real treat. Even I wasn’t expecting this. [To show crew offstage] Okay, please bring out our first guest. We’ll begin at the beginning and so heeeeeeers Matthew!

Matthew enters, blocking glare of spotlights, looking around puzzled. Eventually takes a seat.

HOST: Matthew – is it okay if I call you Matt? Welcome to the show.

MATTHEW: The show?

HOST: Yes, millions of people around the world are certainly watching.

MATTHEW: How is that possible?

HOST: I’m afraid it would take too long to explain. Do you know why you’ve been brought here?

MATTHEW: Yes, that much is obvious. You are minions of the evil one interfering with the work of the kingdom of God.

HOST: No no, you’re here precisely because we are Christians, like you.

MATTHEW: What’s a “Christian”?

HOST [puzzled]: Is the translation software not working properly? Chriiiiis-tyuuuuuhn.

MATTHEW STARES

HOST: A follower of Jesus!

MATTHEW RELAXES

HOST: We brought you here because hold you in the highest esteem. We continue to read and study the Gospel that you wrote today, after two thousand years.

MATTHEW: Two thousand years? But Jesus said that our generation would not pass away until we saw the son of man coming in his kingdom. This must be a diabolical deception. There can’t be ongoing history two thousand years later!

JAMBON: I actually wanted to ask you about that…

HOST: We can come back to that. First things first. What was it like being the first person to write a Gospel?

MATTHEW: The first person to write a Gospel? Oh, that’s who you’re looking for? Yeah, you’re gonna want to talk to Mark.

HOST looks at JAMBON, who asks: Mark?

MATTHEW: Yes, he wrote the first Gospel. I used what he wrote.

HOST, turning to look offstage as he speaks: Well, we had better bring on Mark.

MARK enters and takes a seat next to Matthew, pulls the chair as far away from him as he can, and sits down with his arms crossed looking angrily at Mathew.

HOST: Welcome, Marcus – is it okay if I call you Mark? So glad you can be here with us today.

MARK (still glowering at Matthew): I can’t believe what you did to my book.

MATTHEW: Hey buddy, it’s not my fault you never bothered to get yourself and editor and have it polished and published properly!

HOST and JAMBON exchange nervous glances

HOST: Your books are both sacred scriptures and have been printed in millions of copies in countless languages.

MARK: “Printed”?

JAMBON picks up a Bible and hands it to Mark: Here, let me show you.

MARK flips through the pages, and looks at it.

HOST, speaking to the camera: Viewers at home, you’re witnessing a historic event here, the first time the author of one of the Gospels has had a chance to see a printed Bible.

JAMBON to MARK: Well, what do you think?

MARK pushes it back at him angrily: So, not only did you print Matthew’s derivative work first after he stole so much from me, but you guys lost the ending to my book as well? I’m outta here.

MARK storms off.

MATTHEW stands up and says to HOST and JAMBON: He gets like this. I’ll go after him.

MATTHEW begins to leave hurriedly, then stops and looks back.

MATTHEW: If I get him to come back, better to steer clear of the topic of written Gospels. Did you know Mark is a fantastic chef? Ask him to make you a Markan sandwich, with his secret sauce. [chef’s kiss, then MATTHEW leaves.]

HOST: Well, that was certainly awkward. Dr. Jambon, I thought you brought these men here to demonstrate how what they wrote agrees. What we’ve seen so far suggests that even the authors themselves may not have agreed. What do you say to that?

JAMBON: Well, clearly something must be amiss in the timeline. I’m still trying to wrap my head around it, but I’ll figure it out. In the meantime, maybe talking to Luke and John will help clarify things.

HOST looks offstage: Could you please bring Luke out?

LUKE enters and takes a seat.

HOST: Luke, welcome to the show.

LUKE: Honored to be here, most excellent Mr. Jambon.

HOST: Let me get right to the point. Our viewers will want confirmation from you, the author, that the way your second volume ends is proof that you wrote your books earlier than those liberal scholars say. So can you please confirm for our audience that you wrote what you did while Paul was still alive?

LUKE (after starting incredulously at host for a bit, proceeds to say with a hint of sarcasm): Of course. That’s how you can tell that I wrote my first volume while the apostles were standing on the Mount of Olives staring up at the sky.

HOST: Wow, really?

LUKE: No, what are you an idiot? Each volume ends on a cliffhanger because that was how I hoped to get Theophilus to fund another volume. Unfortunately he didn’t want to sponsor a third season and so my book was cancelled before it could become a trilogy.

HOST: How did you cope with that?

LUKE: God is good. The Lord came to me in a dream and gave me a glimpse of the future that provided me with so much comfort.

HOST: So God showed you how much your two volumes would be appreciated without needing a third?

LUKE (again looking flummoxed and bewildered): No, God showed me what happened to Firefly. It put my own non-renewal in perspective.

HOST looks at JAMBON: Firefly? I don’t understand…

JAMBON (sadly): No, he’s right, that really was a tragedy. I’m still not over it.

HOST: So Luke, since you weren’t an eyewitness, that shows that the Gospels are not just about reporting history. You could do it because you were, like all the others Gospel authors, divinely inspired. So please tell us, what did it feel like to write under the control of the Holy Spirit?

LUKE: Well, I didn’t feel anything different. But I knew that Gospel authors were divinely inspired because of the story Mark kept telling everyone.

HOST: What story was that?

LUKE: He kept saying he had a dream in which he was whisked away into the future and shown how much of an impact Gospels would make, and that he was shown a collection with three others. I obviously wanted to be one of them and so I got in on the ground floor of the Gospel business, before it was too late.

HOST to one of his assistants after a nervous chuckle: Well…we had better bring on John.

JAMBON quickly leans over and puts his hand on HOST’s arm: No, wait! Not at the same time!

JOHN walks on. He and Luke see each other and run towards each other. HOST seems eager, expecting them to embrace. Instead the fists start flying and they wrestle.

LUKE shouts: Jesus was a man full of the Spirit!

JOHN shouts back: Jesus was the Word made flesh!

They shout over each other. Members of the show crew pull them apart and seat them on opposite sides of the host.

HOST: Well, I’m sorry to see that there is such strife and animosity between you, but hopefully when you hear that both of your books are bestsellers side by side in the holy Bible, you’ll feel better.

JOHN and LUKE both cross their arms and glare briefly at each other before turning their chairs to angle them away from each other, much as Mark had done with Matthew.

HOST chuckles nervously then addresses JOHN: So…John. So many things to ask you, but let me start with a compliment. Incredible job with John 3:16. You’ll be proud to know that people hold that verse up at ball games to this very day.

JOHN: 3:16? Verse?

HOST [pointing to Bible]: Do you see these numbers?

JOHN: Yes.

HOST: Those were added to make it easier to refer to specific things that you and the others wrote.

JOHN: Don’t you worry that if you do that, people will start taking individual phrases out of context?

HOST and JAMBON look at each other, then the latter says: No, of course we would never do that.

HOST: John, can you please tell us how to harmonize your Gospel with the others? Tradition says that you wrote after Matthew, Mark and Luke. Why did you decided to add another Gospel? Did you write to supplement the others?

JOHN (angrily): I wrote to replace them! These clowns didn’t know Jesus the way I did. Some of them [he glares at Luke over his shoulder] never even met him.

HOST (his anxiety growing): Ehrm, okay, yes, you leaned on Jesus’ breast and were the only one who followed him to the crucifixion.

JOHN (now looking nervous himself): Oh, well, you see…

HOST: Yes, what is it, we’re all eager to hear from the author of this Gospel that is probably the most popular and widely circulated.

JOHN (muttering almost inaudibly): That was added by my editor.

JAMBON leans in: Sorry, what was that, I couldn’t make out what you said.

JOHN shrugs: That was added by my editor. She said that if my notes were published with my source not named, but instead referred to as the disciple that Jesus loved, the book would circulate better. She took some liberties…

JAMBON: Wait, are you saying that you didn’t write the whole Gospel yourself, that you’re not the “disciple whom Jesus loved,” and even insinuating…that not everything in its pages is true?!

JOHN: Of course not everything in it is true. It’s not as bad as some of those other Gospels, but still…

JAMBON jumps up and begins to pull at JOHN’s face. HOST leaps to his feet and asks him: What on earth are you doing?!

JAMBON (sheepishly, returning to his seat): I thought maybe this would have a Scooby Doo ending.

JOHN looks shocked and rubs his face.

JAMBON (carrying on as though nothing happened): So surely there must have been a real “disciple whom Jesus loved.” If it wasn’t you, then who was it?

JOHN: Sorry, I swore I wouldn’t say. [LUKE mimes to audience while pointing at himself “I know!”]

JAMBON: Well, what can you tell us about them without divulging their name?

JOHN: They certainly were quite a character. Humble in every respect except one. I said, “Let me name the Gospel after you,” and they said no. I said, “Let me depict you in the Gospel I write as the ideal model of discipleship” and they said no to that as well. But then they did have one request and they were quite adamant about it. Always thought it was a bit strange.

JAMBON: What was it? To present Jesus as God incarnate? Include the I am sayings?

JOHN: No, nothing like that.

JAMBON: Well what then?

JOHN: My source said that they would only provide me with the information they had and serve as my source if… [hesitates]

JAMBON: Yes?

JOHN: They would only be my source if I depicted them outrunning Peter in a foot race.

JAMBON stares blankly at JOHN for a few seconds, then says: Anyway…you say that there were many other things that could have been written that you didn’t include. What’s your favorite saying of Jesus that you didn’t include in your Gospel?

JOHN: It’s a tough choice, but one I always regret not including is “Love your brother like your life, protect him like the apple of your eye.”

JAMBON: Interesting, never heard that one, but it sure sounds like the sort of thing Jesus would say.

HOST: One more thing, since we’re getting close to the end of our time. If you don’t mind, I’d like to ask you about the Book of Revelation.

JOHN: The what?

HOST: The last book of the Bible.

JOHN: The what?

JAMBON: He wasn’t here when we showed that to Mark.

JOHN’s eyes narrow: Wait…Did you say Mark is here?

HOST: Yes, yes, never mind that. Take a look at this book. You wrote it, and in recent years there have been quite a lot of people departing from the pure teaching of dispensationalism that you express in it. I wonder if you have advice on how to get the church back on track?

JOHN flips through Revelation, his eyes widening: Woah, this is some wild…uh, stuff. Who did you say wrote this, and what was he smoking?

JAMBON: You wrote it. I don’t know what you’re trying to pull, but it says right here, the Apocalypse of John.

JOHN stares at JAMBON like he’s an idiot: Wait, you thought there was only one guy named John? If you’re not smart enough to understand that, how did you ever manage to build a time machine?

JAMBON puts his face in his hands.

HOST picks up Bible: Okay, look, what I want to know is why you made this book so confusing. Why didn’t you just give us a chart like this one that I had in my Bible growing up? [HOST unfolds chart which covers desk and reaches floor.]

JOHN looks at the “end times” chart, then at JAMBON and the HOST: Wait, what is this weird skubalon? I thought you said you were Christians.

HOST to JOHN and LUKE: Would the two of you excuse us?

Crewmembers escort them off separately.

HOST: Well, that certainly didn’t go as I expected, Professor Jambon.

JAMBON: Indeed.

HOST: This is the risk of live TV. And so I have to ask, for the benefit of those watching who looked to you to confirm their faith and may be finding it shaken by what the Gospel authors said: What’s next? Where do you go from here?

JAMBON (rubbing his hands together with the look of a mad scientist): There’s only one thing to do. This must be what God intended all along. God didn’t show me how to invent a time machine to bring the Gospel authors here to confirm our faith. God must mean for me to use my time machine to send people back in time who will become the real authors of the Gospels, real men of God to replace these liberals who are clearly not up to the task, not worthy of it. Truly the ways of God are beyond our comprehension!

HOST: But surely you don’t mean…?

JAMBON (leaps to his feet): Yes! This is what we will do! We will keep these folks here. Then I will travel back with four conservative apologists. They can be disguised to take their places. I am sure you see that this must be what God intended all along. That’s why the Bible is so puzzling! It was to inspire me, the great Professor Jambon, to set matters right. With the help of my time machine, Christian fundamentalists everywhere will soon have the Bible we deserve, the one we’ve always wanted!

HOST [incredulous]: If you’re going to change history, why not make there be only one Gospel?

JAMBON [pausing, his sinister grin widening]: Yes. Yes! One Gospel to rule them all, one Gospel to find all the heretics and bring them in and bind them to my right way of thinking!

NARRATOR: Will the evil Professor Jambon get away with his dastardly scheme? Can nerdy heroes from Theology Beer Camp make their own time machine and stop him before it’s too late? Tune in next time for the exciting continuation of TIME TRAVELLING APOLOGIST!

Outro music

[This is a skit that I wrote for Theology Beer Camp for last year that ended up not being included. I thought I should share it in case anyone enjoys reading it, and perhaps someone might even want to perform it somewhere. If you do, let me know how it goes and what the reception of it is! For a story of mine involving time travel, read “Certainty” in Theology and Science Fiction or online in Esoterica magazine.]

Previous Post

October 26, 2025

Monty Python meets Theology Beer Camp

Next Post

November 15, 2025 The Carpenter's Son

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"V. good.For me, the gold standard for this sort of thing is still Wikihistory by ..."

Scurra

The Time-Traveler’s Apprentice (A Short Story)

"The one who says "no one comes to the Father but through me" is the ..."

James F. McGrath

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Until I read, "As a Christian, it is possible but not at all necessary to ..."

Sam Vimes

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Hey James, regarding your penultimate paragraph, I struggle with the same issue. I do think ..."

Jeff Cate

The Fourth Synoptic Gospel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz