New Reviews of Christmaker

Last updated on: January 17, 2025 at 12:59 pm by James F. McGrath

0 Comments

New Reviews of Christmaker 2025-01-17T12:59:05-05:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Two new reviews have appeared online about Christmaker: A Life of John the Baptist. Dave Courtney writes about my book:

Every once in a while I come across a book that I finish, set down, and immediately want to discuss with everyone and anyone. This is one such book,

Only to find that it’s near impossible to find someone else who has read it.
More people need to read this. While I had points of disagreement, it is inspired, fascinating, illuminating and important. Not to mention a perfect compliment for the Christmas season too.

At the core of this book is the idea that “Jesus and John were linked, not just in the minds of their opponents and of early Christian authors but apparently also in the mind of Jesus himself.” (P 11). So much so that “If we do not understand John correctly, we will misunderstand Jesus as well.”

It is this premise that shines a light not only on how John “prepares the way” for Jesus, but becomes the very model Jesus’ ministry is built upon. He sets the stage for the revolutionary spirit that Jesus carries forward. He frames the necessary question in the following way:
Scholars understandably suspect that those texts tell us more about what the gospel author thought the relationship between the Baptist and Jesus ought to be than about what John the Baptist actually said. Yet our earliest sources depict John as talking about someone who would come after him, who would be stronger than he (Mark 1:7–8). A central question that this book answers is how an individual whose contemporaries thought he himself might be the Christ (Luke 3:15) came to be thought of exclusively as the forerunner—or as we put it in the title of this book, the Christmaker. (P 11)

There is a concession early on that notes possible skepticism over how much we can actually say and know about the Baptizer. He clarifies some important shifts in the study of history that open doors not just to the earliest materials containing references and documentation, but on analyzing his influence through extant sources that eclipse his own name. In fact, part of what he is helping to uncover is how John is eclipsed by Jesus in a way that shadows his figure and impact, even as John is clearly integral to that development (Jesus being baptized by John being an important starting point).

He touches on the infancy narrative of John (the stories about Zechariah and Elizabeth in Luke 1 are very similar in style and themes to the stories about Hannah and the wife of Manoah in the Jewish Scriptures (1 Sam. 1–2; Judg. 13) p28. He contextualizes John’s choice of clothing (calling it a form of cosplay rooted in his unique family relationship and lineage, caught between the Priestly line of his father and the Nazarite commitments of his mother). He connects details like the wilderness and his weird diet as hyperlinking back to Israel’s wilderness wanderings and the manna. He challenges common conceptions of John as an Essene by instead making him a conversation partner with the Essenes.

The body of the book focuses on two key components of John’s ministry- his baptism for repentance and his critique of the temple and its centralized position. Proclaiming the forgiveness of sins outside of the temple and playing the role of the priest expressly challenged this centrality by making the practice, which was a baptism rite not a singular act (meaning it was practiced daily), available to all people anywhere as part of the universal nature of Israel’s story. This paves the way for Jesus to proclaim the forgiveness of sins apart from the temple and its priests and to challenge the religious order.

Here I push back on the author slightly, even if he is touching on some legitimate points. There is has been so much work lately on correcting misunderstandings of the temple and its practices, and I do wonder if he has fallen into the trap of perpetuating some of these caricatures. There is good reason to believe that domestication of the temple rites in the life of the common household was already widespread, and equal evidence that such notions of forgivness for individual sins was never something tied to those rites in the way the author suggests. If a sin was present, such individuals would be directed to actual reconciliation with the offense and offended. Temple rites were connected with purification of an external space, not repentance.

Which still has relevance connected to John. I just think he overplays his hand here and stands in danger of feeding some supersessionist tendencies. Perhaps some of this will gain further clarity with more reflection, and it’s certainty not a point that undercuts the book as a whole. I think these words from his final chapter are fitting:

“Yes, from our vantage point, we can see him as Christmaker, especially in relation to Jesus, but also as one whose own prophetic life and vision inspired would-be successors and imitators galore for centuries to come. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, the highest form of praise, then perhaps no one in history has been appreciated as much as John, if we include not only those who emulated him directly but also those who imitated those who themselves patterned their lives on John, his predictions, or both.”

Jamie Rottneck writes about my book Christmaker: A Life of John the Baptist:

I want to start by saying that any critiques I have of this book may be attenuated after I read the other volume McGrath published on John. He put out two books for this research project, the present volume, which is very much geared to a lay/non-expert audience, and a second, much more academic volume.

That said, on the whole, this is a good book. It’s well written, for the most part, and very engaging. McGrath puts forward a lot of interesting ideas and provides at least enough argument for all those ideas to be possible, if not necessarily likely.

However, McGrath often makes or implies claims and arguments that feel very much like a stretch, and these don’t receive enough discussion or support in the text. If these are better supported in his John of History, Baptist of Faith, that would be fantastic, because I like many of these ideas. McGrath attempted to write a scholarly monograph in that work, and a popular biographical account in this one.

He did a decent job of it, and frankly made fewer unsupported and unsubstantiated claims and assumptions than someone like NT Wright did in his book about Paul. This might just be because of my own preferences and biases, but I’d have preferred a book with maybe another 50 pages of supporting material, which is why I’m not giving this 5 stars. For the genre (semi-academic, popular biography of long-dead religious figure), it’s much better than the vast majority I’ve encountered, though.

When you read it, please do what both of these individuals did and leave a review on Goodreads, Amazon, or elsewhere. Thank you!

Previous Post

January 2, 2025

Earthseed and the God's Gardeners Compared

Next Post

January 19, 2025 Understanding LLMs: Conversations With Claude

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"V. good.For me, the gold standard for this sort of thing is still Wikihistory by ..."

Scurra

The Time-Traveler’s Apprentice (A Short Story)

"The one who says "no one comes to the Father but through me" is the ..."

James F. McGrath

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Until I read, "As a Christian, it is possible but not at all necessary to ..."

Sam Vimes

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Hey James, regarding your penultimate paragraph, I struggle with the same issue. I do think ..."

Jeff Cate

The Fourth Synoptic Gospel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz