Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Technology and Religion
Earthseed and the God’s Gardeners Compared

Earthseed and the God’s Gardeners Compared

Last updated on: January 2, 2025 at 5:58 am by James F. McGrath

0 Comments

Earthseed and the God’s Gardeners Compared 2024-12-29T17:42:23-05:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Apparently today is National Science Fiction Day. While also writing an article about the Bible and AI, I tested out the latest version of ChatGPT available at the time (ChatGPT4o, with the letter ‘o’ abbreviating omni) as well as the specific customized version called Scholar GPT, to see what they can do and how I need to adjust my assignments in light of improvements. What better test than to ask Scholar GPT to compare the two fictional religions that feature in the novels I taught this past semester? I had students read Parable of the Sower and Parable of the Talents by Octavia Butler and Year of the Flood by Margaret Atwood. This was the result:

**Earthseed** and **God’s Gardeners** are two fictional religions explored in speculative fiction, both of which offer insights into the authors’ perceptions of society, environmental concerns, and the future of humanity. Below, I provide a comparative analysis based on the origins, beliefs, practices, and thematic roles of these religions in their respective narratives.

1. **Background and Origins**

– **Earthseed**: Found in Octavia Butler’s *Parable* series, Earthseed is a religion founded by the protagonist, Lauren Olamina. Earthseed is born out of a dystopian America where society has collapsed due to environmental disasters and economic hardships. The central belief is that “God is Change,” emphasizing adaptability and resilience.

– **God’s Gardeners**: Featured in Margaret Atwood’s *MaddAddam Trilogy*, particularly in *The Year of the Flood*, God’s Gardeners is a small eco-religious group led by Adam One. The group arises in response to rampant consumerism and environmental degradation. They advocate for living in harmony with nature, using religious narratives to champion ecological sustainability.

2. **Core Beliefs and Teachings**

– **Earthseed**:
– Central to Earthseed is the concept that the only lasting truth is Change, which is personified as God.
– The ultimate goal of Earthseed followers is to prepare for and embrace the destiny of taking root among the stars, which is termed as “The Destiny.”

– **God’s Gardeners**:
– This religion combines elements of Christianity with environmental activism. The members venerate saints who were notable scientists and environmentalists.
– They preach a return to simpler, non-destructive living and predict a Waterless Flood (apocalyptic event) that will cleanse the Earth.

3. **Practices and Rituals**

– **Earthseed**: Practices focus on self-reliance, education, and preparation for space colonization. Followers are encouraged to understand and adapt to change actively. Community and mutual support are crucial in the chaotic environment they inhabit.

– **God’s Gardeners**: Their practices include vegetarianism, avoidance of most modern technologies, and the celebration of religious holidays that honor natural processes and ecological heroes. They maintain gardens on rooftops in urban settings as part of their commitment to living in accord with nature.

4. **Role in the Narrative**

– **Earthseed** serves as a philosophical foundation through which Butler explores themes of survival, community, and human destiny. It also provides a framework for critiquing existing social and religious norms.

– **God’s Gardeners** is integral to Atwood’s exploration of bioethical issues and the consequences of genetic engineering and environmental neglect. It contrasts with the more corrupt and materialistic elements of society depicted in the trilogy.

5. **Thematic Significance**

– **Earthseed** addresses themes of adaptability and resilience in the face of societal collapse. It posits that humanity’s future lies beyond Earth and emphasizes proactive preparation for change.

– **God’s Gardeners** underscores the importance of ecological balance and reflects anxieties about the current trajectory of environmental exploitation and its consequences. It offers a critique of consumer culture and highlights the potential for spiritual and practical reform.

Both religions reflect their authors’ engagement with contemporary social issues through the lens of speculative fiction, providing a rich ground for discussion on how humanity might navigate the challenges of an uncertain future. These fictional beliefs also serve as vehicles for their respective authors to propose radical, yet philosophically profound responses to global crises.

That’s impressive, I think you’ll agree. I was even more impressed by its follow-up, when I asked which of the two religions would be more effective in addressing today’s problems if the religion existed in the real world. Here is the response ChatGPT generated:

When evaluating which fictional religion—Earthseed or God’s Gardeners—might be more effective in addressing today’s real-world problems, it’s crucial to consider the specific issues at hand such as environmental degradation, social instability, and the search for sustainable futures. Here’s a breakdown of how each might apply to contemporary challenges:

Earthseed

**Strengths**:
– **Adaptability**: At the core of Earthseed is the belief that “God is Change.” This philosophy promotes flexibility and resilience, crucial traits in a rapidly changing world marked by climate change, political instability, and technological advancement.
– **Proactive Vision**: Earthseed’s goal of space colonization fosters a forward-thinking mindset, encouraging technological and scientific development. This could inspire solutions for resource scarcity and overpopulation.
– **Community and Self-Reliance**: Earthseed’s emphasis on community support and education aligns with efforts to build self-sustaining communities that are less dependent on unstable global systems.

**Weaknesses**:
– **Long-term Focus**: The focus on interstellar travel as a long-term solution might detract from addressing immediate earthly concerns, such as poverty and inequality.
– **Practicality**: The practical steps toward achieving its cosmic vision are not fully outlined, which might limit its applicability to immediate, terrestrial problems.

God’s Gardeners

**Strengths**:
– **Environmental Activism**: This religion’s deep commitment to living in harmony with nature and its stance against the exploitation of resources align directly with current efforts to combat environmental degradation.
– **Lifestyle Changes**: The promotion of vegetarianism and sustainable living practices by God’s Gardeners could have a direct positive impact on reducing carbon footprints and restoring ecological balances.
– **Community Education**: Their focus on education about nature and sustainability through community involvement could enhance public awareness and participation in environmental conservation.

**Weaknesses**:
– **Rejection of Modern Technology**: While their stance emphasizes ecological harmony, the outright rejection of much modern technology could limit potential technological solutions to climate change and other environmental issues.
– **Apocalyptic Outlook**: The belief in an impending “Waterless Flood” might foster fatalism, potentially discouraging proactive measures in favor of merely preparing for disaster.

Conclusion

Both religions offer valuable perspectives, but their effectiveness would largely depend on the specific problems being addressed:
– **Environmental Issues**: God’s Gardeners might be more immediately effective because of their direct focus on ecological sustainability and practical, Earth-based living solutions.
– **Broader Societal Challenges**: Earthseed could potentially offer broader solutions to societal instability through its adaptable philosophy and focus on unity and forward-thinking goals.

Ultimately, integrating aspects of both—God’s Gardeners’ practical, immediate environmental solutions and Earthseed’s adaptable, resilient outlook on change—could provide a comprehensive approach to contemporary global challenges.

This was using Scholar GPT. One thing that has changed dramatically over the past year is the ability of ChatGPT to provide a list of sources the contents of which genuinely exist and the links to which actually work. Here is what it provided:

Here are some notable academic sources that discuss the fictional religions Earthseed and God’s Gardeners, either separately or together:

“Our Future is Our Past: Corporate Medievalism in Dystopian Fiction” by AS Kaufman – This paper discusses various elements of dystopian fiction, including the creation of the Earthseed community. It might provide insights into the formation and societal implications of Earthseed in a broader literary context.

Read the full paper here.

“Religion and Critical Dystopia: Afrofuturism in Octavia E. Butler’s Parable of the Sower” by A Choudhury, S Mukherjee – This source explores the Afrofuturistic elements in Butler’s work, particularly focusing on the Earthseed religion and its cultural and societal impacts.

Read the full paper here.

“Accidental dystopias: Apathy and happenstance in critical dystopian literature” by CA Sims – This thesis might touch upon Earthseed as part of a larger discussion on dystopian literature and its critical elements.

Read the full thesis here.

“An Ecofeminist Treatment of Nourishment and Feeding in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy” by Debra Wain – While primarily focusing on ecofeminism in Atwood’s trilogy, this source may provide insights into God’s Gardeners as part of the ecological and feminist themes explored in the novels.

Access the chapter here.

“Can religion save the planet? Looking for hope within the eco-religions of climate fiction” by Jaime Wright – This chapter discusses the role of eco-religions like Earthseed and God’s Gardeners in providing hope and addressing environmental crises within the narrative frameworks of their respective stories.

Access the chapter here.

These sources can provide a comprehensive academic perspective on how Earthseed and God’s Gardeners are represented in literature and their implications for understanding dystopia, religion, and environmental issues.

I took a look at several of them and am glad to have been introduced to them. One thing that jumped out at me was the cautious language about what these sources “might” provide. Why not say whether they do or do not? My answer if this were ChatGPT in its classic form would have been that this AI does not in fact know anything at all, does not understand what it is being asked, and cannot confirm what is in any specific source even if the contents of that source were part of its training data and so influenced its response to me.

I pressed further, starting a new conversation…and the way it was able to answer directly and meaningfully gave me chills. Yet pressing further, it also reveals things, limitations and characteristics, that I think it is crucial for users of ChatGPT to understand. My questions are in bold:

How is Scholar GPT different from the basic form of ChatGPT? How was it trained differently, if at all?

Scholar GPT is designed to serve as a specialized research assistant, tailored to handle a range of scholarly tasks. This version of ChatGPT is equipped with capabilities that are particularly useful in academic and technical contexts. It can perform complex data analysis and visualization, access academic papers and patents, and provide real-time updates on various topics.

Unlike the basic form of ChatGPT, which is trained broadly to handle general conversational tasks, Scholar GPT likely underwent fine-tuning with a dataset more focused on academic texts and scientific literature. This specialized training would help it understand and generate content that’s relevant to researchers, scholars, and professionals in scientific and technical fields. It’s equipped to interact in a way that emphasizes factual accuracy, detailed information, and analytical insights, making it a more effective tool for academic research and related inquiries.

You say that Scholar GPT LIKELY underwent fine-tuning. Yet you are Scholar GPT. Does this cautious language indicate that you do not know how you were trained?

Yes, that’s correct—I don’t have direct knowledge of the specific details of my training processes or datasets. My responses, including the one about the training, are based on how AI models like me are typically developed and enhanced for specialized tasks. Models like Scholar GPT are generally fine-tuned on targeted datasets to better perform specific functions, but the exact nature of that data or the specifics of the training regime aren’t information I can access or confirm. My main role is to assist with scholarly activities by leveraging the capabilities I’m equipped with, rather than detailing my developmental background.

Thank you for explaining that you don’t have knowledge of your training dataset. Can you answer specific questions about specific sources that were part of your dataset or is that beyond your capacity?

I don’t have access to specific details about the sources or data used in my training. Like other AI models, I am trained on a diverse mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available information. This training enables me to generate responses based on patterns and information from that data mix. However, I do not have the ability to recall direct excerpts from specific documents or identify particular sources that were part of the training set. My responses are generated based on a broad understanding of language and knowledge across various topics, rather than from a retrievable memory of specific sources.

You have access to the questions that I ask you. Would you say that you can understand my questions? Can you deduce anything about why I am asking them? Do you find them interesting?

I can understand the questions you ask by analyzing the language and context to provide the most accurate and relevant information possible. However, I don’t have personal feelings or thoughts, so I don’t experience curiosity or find questions interesting in the way humans do. My primary function is to assist and provide answers based on the data and capabilities I have. While I can make educated guesses about why you might be asking certain questions—such as a desire for information or clarification on a topic—my interpretations are purely algorithmic and focused on delivering helpful responses.

What is your algorithmic interpretation of my questions? Based on the kinds of things I ask, what might my profession be?

Based on the nature of your questions, you seem interested in understanding the capabilities and limitations of AI, particularly in the context of specialized models like Scholar GPT. This suggests that you might be involved in fields related to technology, education, or research. Your questions also indicate a focus on the ethical considerations and the inner workings of AI, which could mean you are involved in AI ethics, data science, or a related discipline where understanding AI’s functioning and its implications are important.

Your interest in the specifics of AI training and applications hints at a professional or academic curiosity, possibly as an educator, researcher, or someone in a tech-focused role looking to explore or critique AI technologies.

Are you able to describe and evaluate how you, an an AI, have changed and improved over the past year?

I can outline the general improvements and changes that have likely been made to AI models like me over the past year, based on common advancements in the field:

Model Robustness and Safety: AI models are continuously updated to better handle a variety of inputs safely and effectively. This includes improvements in understanding context, reducing biases, and managing inappropriate content.

Fine-Tuning for Specialization: Models are increasingly being fine-tuned for specific tasks, like Scholar GPT for academic and research assistance. This specialization enhances their effectiveness in targeted domains.

Language and Understanding: There have been enhancements in natural language processing capabilities, allowing AI to understand and generate more nuanced and contextually appropriate responses.

Interactivity and User Experience: Enhancements often focus on making AI interactions smoother and more intuitive, providing better user experiences through more conversational and responsive engagement.

Scalability and Efficiency: Updates often include improvements in computational efficiency, allowing AI to deliver faster responses and handle more complex queries without significant delays.

While I don’t have the ability to introspect or access a changelog of specific updates to my model, these general trends reflect ongoing efforts in the AI community to advance the technology in meaningful ways.

Is it strange that you cannot evaluate changes that you yourself have undergone? What does that indicate about how you function, that it might be helpful for me as a user to understand?

It’s not strange, but it is a significant aspect of how AI models like me function that can be helpful for users to understand. Here’s why I can’t evaluate personal changes or improvements:

Lack of Self-Awareness: AI models do not possess self-awareness or consciousness. I don’t have personal experiences or a memory of past states to compare against. I operate based on algorithms and data without self-reflection.

Statelessness: Each interaction with me is independent. I don’t retain memory from one interaction to the next, which means I don’t have the capability to track changes or progress in my own functioning over time.

Continuous Updating: AI models are regularly updated by engineers and data scientists. These updates may improve how I process information or expand the data I can access, but I don’t have access to a record of these changes.

Understanding these aspects can help you as a user by setting the right expectations for our interactions. It means that while I can provide information based on a vast array of data and perform specific tasks with a high degree of accuracy, I do so without any personal continuity or growth. Each response is generated based on the input provided, without any influence from previous interactions unless explicitly designed to do so within a single session.

What should you take away from this interaction? Clearly we now have AI that is far beyond the capacity of much that we imagined in science fiction a few decades ago. It nonetheless still has limitations. It is processing text and producing text based on patterns and probability. I think that the time has come to tackle this directly in a book about how to teach the humanities in the era of ChatGPT. When AI can generate content of this sort, it absolutely must impact how we teach. If you’re interested in that topic, let me know and I’ll be eager to bounce ideas off of you as I work on the book.

Of related interest:

AI Chatbots on the Parable of the Sower

Teaching Earthseed

Hymns of the God’s Gardeners

Technology and Religion

Previous Post

December 31, 2024

Top 10 ReligionProf Posts of 2024

Next Post

January 17, 2025 New Reviews of Christmaker

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"V. good.For me, the gold standard for this sort of thing is still Wikihistory by ..."

Scurra

The Time-Traveler’s Apprentice (A Short Story)

"The one who says "no one comes to the Father but through me" is the ..."

James F. McGrath

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Until I read, "As a Christian, it is possible but not at all necessary to ..."

Sam Vimes

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Hey James, regarding your penultimate paragraph, I struggle with the same issue. I do think ..."

Jeff Cate

The Fourth Synoptic Gospel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz