Doctor Who Goes Rogue

Last updated on: June 9, 2024 at 5:57 am by James F. McGrath

0 Comments

Doctor Who Goes Rogue 2024-06-09T05:57:04-04:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Rogue” is quite an episode of Doctor Who. We’ve gone from absolute silliness at the beginning of the season through the mysterious, spooky and frightening to now be offered a tale of romance set in the 19th century. As Ruby describes it, “This is so Bridgerton.” In the midst of this glimpse of the bygone Regency Era as it has become a familiar part of storytelling through period dramas, “Rogue” also offers viewers a romantic storyline, highlights but doesn’t address the huge disconnect between modern life and marriage and that of almost all human societies throughout history, and offers a poignant bit of symbolism. Spoilers follow!

The gist of the story is that alien shapeshifters called Chuldur who are cosplayers. They visit a planet in order to take the form of inhabitants (killing them in the process) and then play their roles, enjoying the emotion. That seems to me to be highly symbolic in an episode that explores romance, loss, love, marriage, and more. I think that we are supposed to reflect on the extent to which genuine love and friendship require allowing our true selves to be seen, yet so often our relationships with others are essentially cosplay. It is when the Doctor is honest with Rogue about his identity that their relationship can take a dramatic turn.

The character of Emily Beckett (who turns out to be a Chuldur cosplaying) is concerned about her prospects after having been seen alone with a man and there not having been a proposal. Ruby’s insistence that she doesn’t need him and can do whatever she likes is very modern, and highly problematic. While it is true that there is no obligation for the society and marriage to function as they did back then, culture is a shared agreement on values and procedures and one person alone cannot always successfully change that.

The Doctor is rarely flirtatious and even less frequently is it in a way that seems to involve genuine connection. This story is different and we are given a sense of the attraction between the Doctor and Rogue right away, which was crucial to make the emotional arc of the episode seem compelling. It is hard to have deep enough connection in a single episode for there to be a sense of genuine loss, but to the extent it is possible this episode tries to accomplish it. Indeed, this episode is more about loss than about love. Rogue had lost someone. The Doctor had lost everyone. Rogue asks whether the Doctor ever wonders why keep going, and he replies that you have to keep living precisely for those whom you’ve lost, to go on living precisely because they cannot and did not.

The episode “The Giggle” promised that the Doctor would be doing therapy out of order, that this new regeneration would be different and in a better place precisely because of the bigeneration providing an opportunity for slowing down and enjoying having a family. This Doctor may or may not be experiencing that, and that Doctor may or may not be experiencing what Ncuti Gatwa’s Doctor is, although presumably they reconverge in some way if what was said about therapy is true. Either way, the current Doctor is about to move on to new adventures after losing Rogue because “that is what I do.” Ruby refuses to let him do it and provides a hug. From our perspective as viewers, it seems as though ample room has been left for Rogue to return.

Also great to have Dungeons and Dragons references in the show! Hard to know what to make of the glimplse of either to the Shalka Doctor or one from “The Curse of Fatal Death.” Probably just a tongue in cheek way of expressing that the Doctor has had more lives than we’ve seen, but who knows.

For Doctor Who to have this relationship the focus of its story on the same day as our local Pride Parade here in Indianapolis made it even more powerful and poignant. Those were incredible moments when Rogue proposed, when he tossed the Doctor the bouquet, and when the Doctor put on his ring. Let’s call it Pride meets Pride and Prejudice.

I will also of course highlight the character of the vicar, the one explicit presence of religion in the episode. The vicar tries to sneak away, but when made to come forward to perform a wedding for the Chuldur, he insists that it would be impossible to consecrate a marriage between creatures from hell. The Chuldur that kills him takes his clerical garb but not his human form, and unlike all the other cosplaying by them throughout the episode in this instance botches the wording of the marriage ceremony and treats them with disdain. As so often, Doctor Who pokes fun at religion on the surface level yet offers something more insightful and appreciative beneath the surface. Creatures that kill for their own entertainment would not be expected to value religion, and while the vicar may have assumed them to be creatures from hell in some more literal sense, metaphorically the phrase seems apt. There must be a basis for evaluating and critiquing those who place no value on the lives of others, who live only for their own pleasure.

We also glimpse the Doctor’s problematic ethics which I discuss in my book on the episode “The Battle of Ranskoor av Kolos.” He avoids killing but has no problem confining beings to suffer for centuries. As we see explicitly in this episode, the Doctor cannot sacrifice a friend even to save the world. It is a thin line that separates being willing to see a whole world sacrificed if it offers the prospect of saving one life of someone you hold dear, and being willing to take lives to protect the interests of one’s own group.

What did you think of “Rogue”? In particular, what do you think of Ruby’s insistence to a 19th century woman that she can do whatever she wants? Modern English speakers live in cultures that often claim that we can do what we want in life, from education to career to marriage and more. It isn’t true even today. We are all constrained in ways that modern freedom-loving individualists bristle at. Is it nevertheless more problematic for someone from modern British culture to assume that what is possible for them is possible for someone in a different era – or in another cultural context in their own era, for that matter?

Relationships and Religion

Doctor Who

pride

Previous Post

June 4, 2024

Doctor Who: RIP Ricky September

Next Post

June 11, 2024 Christmaker Official Release Day!

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"V. good.For me, the gold standard for this sort of thing is still Wikihistory by ..."

Scurra

The Time-Traveler’s Apprentice (A Short Story)

"The one who says "no one comes to the Father but through me" is the ..."

James F. McGrath

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Until I read, "As a Christian, it is possible but not at all necessary to ..."

Sam Vimes

Attack on Religious Freedom in Indiana

"Hey James, regarding your penultimate paragraph, I struggle with the same issue. I do think ..."

Jeff Cate

The Fourth Synoptic Gospel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz