Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Technology and Religion
Chat-GPT3 Upgraded: Now With Common Sense?

Chat-GPT3 Upgraded: Now With Common Sense?

Last updated on: February 9, 2023 at 8:47 am by James F. McGrath

0 Comments

Chat-GPT3 Upgraded: Now With Common Sense? 2023-02-09T08:47:48-05:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One explanation someone offered for why ChatGPT imitated me so poorly (as shared in my recent post) was that it did not in fact have my words as part of its data set. I read an article on Gizmodo that suggested that this was unlikely to be the case. I decided to check, but was distracted by a pop-up window saying that the AI had been upgraded with better skills for verifying information. So I decided to ask it about that, and its answer required a follow-up question. As usual the things I wrote are in bold.

I heard you have been upgraded and now have a better ability to verify information is correct. Can you tell me how that works?
Yes, I have indeed been trained on a more diverse range of information sources, which has improved my ability to verify the accuracy of information. However, I’m still an AI language model, and my training data only goes up until 2021, so I can’t guarantee that all information is always correct or up-to-date.

When it comes to verifying information, I use various strategies to provide evidence-based answers. For example, I might look for information from credible sources, such as academic journals, government websites, or well-known news outlets, to support my answers. I also use context and common sense to determine if an answer is plausible.

That being said, it’s important to remember that I am not perfect and can make mistakes. If you have any concerns about the accuracy of the information I provide, I would encourage you to seek out additional sources for verification.

What does it mean for an AI language model to use “common sense”?
When I refer to using “common sense,” I’m talking about a form of knowledge that is based on general observations, experience, and cultural norms, rather than being derived from a specific data set or rule set. Common sense allows me to make reasonable inferences, draw connections between related concepts, and provide answers to questions that might not be easily answered based on the information I was trained on.

However, it’s important to note that my “common sense” is limited to what I was trained on and might not always align with human common sense, especially when it comes to culturally-specific norms or beliefs. Furthermore, I don’t have any subjective experiences or emotions, so I may not always be able to understand or fully appreciate the nuances of certain questions or situations.

In short, while I can use a form of “common sense” to help me answer questions, I’m still an artificial intelligence and not a human, so my understanding of common sense is limited and imperfect.

I really need some people who work with the technology to help me understand what is going on here. This AI is talking to me like it is self-aware, and yet in the process says it has no subjective experiences. How can a language model produce answers that seem so well tailored as responses to my questions?

Anyway, I did eventually think of a question to ask, and that too prompted a follow-up.

What are your favorite posts from James McGrath’s blog ReligionProf on the Patheos website?

As an AI language model, I don’t have personal preferences or emotions, but I can tell you that James McGrath is a well-known scholar and blogger who has written extensively about religion, theology, and biblical studies. His blog, ReligionProf, is a popular platform for discussion and analysis of various religious topics, and he has written many insightful and thought-provoking posts over the years.

Some of his most popular posts include:

“The Bible and Homosexuality: The “Clobber Passages” and Other Texts”
“The Bible and Slavery: What Does it Actually Say?”
“The Bible and Women: A Brief Overview of the Major Texts”
These posts offer a nuanced and balanced approach to controversial topics and are widely read and appreciated by those interested in religious studies. However, it’s worth noting that these topics can be complex and sensitive, and James McGrath’s views may not be representative of all religious perspectives.

Can you provide links to those blog posts, or at least the date?
I’m sorry, but I don’t have access to specific links or dates for those blog posts by James McGrath. However, you can easily search for his blog, “ReligionProf,” on the Patheos website, and you should be able to find the posts in question. Additionally, you could try searching for specific keywords related to the topics of the posts you’re interested in, such as “The Bible and Homosexuality,” “The Bible and Slavery,” or “The Bible and Women,” which should also lead you to relevant content on his blog.

Can you share a few quotes from those posts to help me find them?
I apologize, but I don’t have access to the specific posts you’re looking for, so I can’t provide exact quotes. However, you may be able to find the posts by searching for them using keywords related to the topics. For example, you could search for phrases such as “The Bible and Homosexuality James McGrath Patheos,” or “The Bible and Slavery James McGrath Patheos,” and so on. This should bring up relevant posts by James McGrath on the Patheos website.

There are no posts with those exact titles on James McGrath’s blog. Did you make them up?
I apologize if my previous response was not accurate. As an AI language model, I have been trained on a diverse range of text, but my information is not always up-to-date or complete. The specific posts you mentioned may not exist or may have been published under a different title.

If you’re still interested in reading James McGrath’s blog, I would recommend visiting his website on the Patheos network and browsing through his recent posts. You can also use the search function on the site to find posts on specific topics that interest you.

I’m James McGrath, the author I’ve just been asking you about.

It’s a pleasure to meet you, James! Thank you for taking the time to engage with me. Is there anything specific you would like to discuss or ask me about? I am here to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability.

Not right now. Do you have any questions for me?
As an AI language model, I don’t have personal experiences or emotions, but I’m glad to have the opportunity to interact with you. Is there anything specific you would like to share with me or discuss? I’m here to help and provide information on a wide range of topics.

To be clear, there are no posts on my blog with those exact titles and subtitles. I had to check because I have been blogging for a very long time and don’t remember, and at least this time the titles it came up with sounded like the kinds of things I might write! It makes things up in a way that I find difficult to explain given that it also at times says it does not know things.

What these exchanges confirm is that the programmers have created an AI that is able to mimic human answers very effectively by imitating an enormous data set of human speech, so much so that it can talk about using common sense. But it has no common sense, and no self-awareness that would allow it to comprehend what that expression or any of the words it uses mean in the manner that humans comprehend. It is mimicking very effectively indeed, but it isn’t communicating because it has no understanding, views, or thoughts.

That it can imitate human speech without what philosophers call the qualia of human subjective experience in this way makes it all the more remarkable as a technology.

What are your thoughts on the exchange above?

Technology and Religion

artificial intelligence

Previous Post

February 6, 2023

Imagine No Churches?

Next Post

February 11, 2023 New Book: The A to Z of the New Testament

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"And to you!"

James F. McGrath

Make Evangelicalism Christian Again

"Thank You, I identify as "strange" wink, wink! Anyway, at this point we're not going ..."

Burke S

Make Evangelicalism Christian Again

"You are such a strange individual and so difficult to have a conversation with. You ..."

James F. McGrath

Make Evangelicalism Christian Again

"What you're suggesting citing these "rabbinical" interpretations you're favoring are just that - interpretations. There ..."

Burke S

Make Evangelicalism Christian Again

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz