Evangelicals, Objective Truth, and the MSM

Last updated on: January 19, 2021 at 12:39 pm by James F. McGrath

Evangelicals, Objective Truth, and the MSM 2021-01-19T12:39:25-05:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As I was thinking about what I should blog about next that would be relevant to current events, Murray Hogg wrote a comment on Facebook that motivated this post. Here’s what he wrote:

It’s kind of bizarre that only a few short years ago Evangelicals were obsessed with berating the emerging church as “postmodern” because of their (alleged) rejection of objective truth.

There’s definitely some bizarre epistemological shenanigans going on that leave these people at the mercy of science denial, conspiracy theories, and related phenomena.

Objective truth isn’t as popular as it used to be!

EDIT: Actually, objective truth is still popular amongst Evangelicals, but they’ve long since abandoned any sound methodology that would lead them to discover it.

This was in response to someone who responded to an image of a tweet with conspiracy theory and racist misinformation. This was the tweet:

The commenter that prompted Murray’s response was going on about the “Woke Left” burning down America’s cities and the higher prevalence of murder by blacks. As I myself had written earlier in that same comment thread, misinformation about BLM protests and the current dangerous conspiracy theories about the election and the pandemic are related.

As I reflected on this I realized it is nothing new. On the contrary, Evangelicals talking about absolute truth, a modern notion, has from the very dawn of the Enlightenment era gone hand in hand with a rejection of almost every method that has been developed to try to reach that truth. On occasion they have tried a different but related approach, rejecting the results of historical criticism, biological science, and so on.

We are not dealing with an anomaly at present in the attack on Democracy and the embrace of political conspiracy theories. We are dealing with the latest expression of a culture of duplicity and misinformation that is centuries old.

No one should misunderstand this as something to do with “Christianity” in general or “religion” in general. Christians and other religious people were actively involved in the development of the modern natural sciences. Liberal Protestants were active in developing, applying, and promoting the historical-critical methods of the Bible, as we still are.

This is important to note not least because it helps address questions such as whether the attack on the Capitol was perpetrated by “Christians.” Christians have never agreed on what it means to be a Christian. Literally, never. That is yet another reason how you can be sure that the conservative Evangelical rhetoric about “absolute truth” has always been a marketing ploy rather than a statement of fact or of genuine commitment. That “absolute truth” was from the outset visibly one small minority view of what Christian truth was and should be. Christians have been leading scientists and science deniers, abolitionists and white supremacists. I can certainly make a case for the latter in both those pairs being less true to the Bible and the teaching of Jesus. But that is an argument and reasonable deduction, things that those who’ve emphasized supposed “absolute truth” have always bristled at. Ken Ham is notorious for responding to scientific deduction with “Were you there?” (As though he was there!) At the same time he and other young-earth creationists have taken the postmodern stance of claiming to be discussing the same facts just through a different and purportedly superior lens. Yet they have never actually agreed about the facts, and the claim to have different lenses really meant they had a different “conclusion” they were determined from the outset to find a way to defend at any cost. That is not a different “lens” through which to view the same evidence. It is not akin to adopting a historical-critical vs. a literary approach to the same text. It is assuming that one’s assumptions are right and finding a way to argue for them at any cost. It is nothing other than ideological bias and motivated reasoning, things that conservative Christians have often accused everyone but themselves of being guilty of with no sense of irony.

The denial of the legitimacy of the “mainstream media” (meaning all journalistic outlets worldwide who report things from a perspective they don’t accept) is the natural successor to the rejection of mainstream scholarship and science. They also reject the mainstream/mainline churches. The entire worldview is based on the egotistical conviction of being among a small number who hold the right views in a world in which the majority are wrong. That emphasis may sound biblical, until you take a close look and realize that the narrow road of the faithful few does not refer to a small number accepting particular doctrines and ideas, but a small number being willing to live out and practice core ethical teaching.

In short, Christians are not and have never been pioneers in the realm of truth or standing for truth against falsehood. On the other hand, Conservative Christians have been and continue to be among the pioneers in the realm of false advertising, a trend that continues to the present day, with devastating consequences. This doesn’t offer anything encouraging or hopeful with regard to how we might combat it going forward. But if we are to have any hope of finding long-term solutions to the problems we’re facing, we must begin with an honest diagnosis of the problem. The current state of affairs sees us with an entire subculture that doesn’t want to accept reality as revealed by science, history, or journalism. But it wants to believe it is right. And so we end up with people turning to fringe radical propaganda while simultaneously believing that in doing so they are avoiding the influence of propaganda, which is what they have defined mainstream media (in Parler parlance the MSM) as being.

When someone has sold their soul, conscience, and intellect through maneuvers like these, what can be done to restore a healthy openness to reason based on shared evidence and shared principles of reasoning?

Of related interest:

Evangelical Christians Face a Reckoning

A Revolution of Nothing

Sunday Meditations: Are We Better Than This?

https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/01/10/robert-jeffress-blames-kingdom-of-satan-not-christians-for-capitol-siege/

Whose Flag Do You Carry?

Christian Nationalism is Heresy

Previous Post

January 10, 2021

CRINT Essay Prize in Early Jewish and Christian Studies

Next Post

January 12, 2021 John the Baptist Enoch Seminar Nangeroni Meeting Day 1

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz