Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Doctor Who: The Novelization of the Daleks

Doctor Who: The Novelization of the Daleks

Last updated on: October 15, 2011 at 12:08 am by James F. McGrath

Doctor Who: The Novelization of the Daleks 2011-10-15T00:08:11-04:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As I have mentioned before, one of the ways I am going back to “rewatch” Doctor Who from the very beginning is taking advantage of the opportunity to listen to these classic episodes in the car as audiobooks.

Yet other than the lost episodes, the recordings of the actual soundtracks of Doctor Who episodes generally lack narration, meaning that unless the episode is fresh in one’s mind or familiar, some portions may simply be eerie music or sounds that it is difficult to interpret without images to go with them.

For that reason, I chose to listen to the audiobook of the novelization of the second Doctor Who episode, “The Daleks,” released under the title Doctor Who and the Daleks. The novel was written by David Whitaker, one of the editors who originally worked on the televised episode, and is read by William Russell who played Ian Chesterton. Even so, the novel takes a few major liberties with the story as it aired: it introduces a new manner in which the characters met (this was the first Doctor Who novel to be published, and so perhaps this was felt to be necessary in order to introduce the characters and their circumstances of being together quickly); it makes Susan’s fake surname “English”; it has a glass Dalek as the leader of the Daleks; and it highlights the romantic feelings that develop between Ian and Barbara. Other than these details, the novel largely remains faithful to the spirit of the actual television episode, and in many cases to the precise wording of the dialogue.

There are a number of aspects of “The Daleks” that could be worth talking about. With World War II a much more recent event, Terry Nation’s script intended to depict the Daleks’ determination to be the sole inhabitants of Skaro in a manner reminiscent of the Nazis. The Daleks are ironically trying to wipe out the blond-haired Thals, who are reminiscent of the ideal Aryan of the Nazis, while themselves not recognizing their own ugliness and deformity – to say nothing of their evil.

But the element that struck me most was the Doctor’s remonstration of Ian for his skepticism, his unwillingness to believe that which seems impossible to him. The Doctor views Ian’s skepticism as a failing, and I think there is a discrepancy in how different sorts of skepticism may be viewed by the same people – a discrepancy that is telling.

On the one hand, if someone views claims about superior technology, contact with aliens, or anything else that currently has a science fictional character, they would be considered praiseworthy in what we might call the “skeptical community.”

On the other hand, if someone from an isolated and technologically underdeveloped part of the world were to express skepticism about space travel, modern medicine, or evolution, they would be viewed as having an unwarranted skepticism that simply showed the limitations of their “primitive thinking.”

As I listened to the Doctor berate Ian, I wondered whether one can really have it both ways and be fair.

Surely the same sort of skepticism is being adopted in both cases, the only difference between the one that is viewed with admiration and the one that is viewed with disdain being the way they look based on our own current state of knowledge.

Science fiction authors and fans have often found themselves caught in this tension, viewing those who react to more advanced technology with skepticism as pathetic and primitive, while those who fail to be skeptical of claims about that which is currently – or in the fictional world of the sci-fi story in question – impossible are likewise viewed as credulous and foolish.

Yet ironically, the more recent episodes of Doctor Who have called for increasing suspension of disbelief, as the Doctor’s sonic screwdriver becomes a magic wand that can accomplish anything.

What do you consider the appropriate balance between skepticism and an openness to believing the seemingly impossible? Does the line conveniently run along the edge of our current scientific knowledge? Ought it to be situated there, and if not there, then where?

Speaking of edges, the next episode will be “The Edge of Destruction”!

Previous Post

October 14, 2011

Doherty Mythicism?

Next Post

October 15, 2011 This is Your Brain on Inerrancy. Any Questions?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz