The View From Everywhere: Impartiality, Objectivity and Other Ideals

Last updated on: May 13, 2009 at 9:20 am by James F. McGrath

The View From Everywhere: Impartiality, Objectivity and Other Ideals 2009-05-13T09:20:00-04:00 James F. McGrath

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m grateful to Pat McCullough for drawing my attention to recent posts on the blog In The Corner With Matt. Among other interesting things, I found a quote from a recent book by Rodney Stark about history and evidence that paralleled some of my own thoughts over the past couple of days.

The “postmodern” challenge against “objectivity” and “impartiality” is helpful inasmuch as it leads us to humbly acknowledge that we have not achieved objectivity or impartiality ourselves. But those who go further, and who denigrate the very notion that it is worth trying to be objective or impartial, go too far, to an extreme that in any other area would be dismissed as ridiculous. Imagine if someone claimed that, because a nation’s criminal justice system fails to achieve real justice for all, and because notions of justice differ from country to country, therefore there is no point in having a criminal justice system at all. I doubt many would follow them in calling for the elimination of the police forces and the courts.

When it comes to historical study, we do consistently fail to achieve objectivity. There is no way we can ever view the evidence “from nowhere”, much less “from a God’s eye perspective”. But that no more makes the ideal inappropriate to aim for, than does our failure to love perfectly, or even to attain our precise weight-loss aims. Indeed, that last example has been known to illustrate, in the experience of many, just how dangerous the line of thinking is that says “I failed to achieve my goal, therefore I will stop trying”. The quest to attain a goal is often valuable, even if the goal is never in fact obtained.

Certain sorts of “postmodern” thought (usually of a popular rather than a philosophical or methodologically sophisticated sort), by rejecting the value of seeking to have one’s views challenged by an “objective reality” (or simply by the perspectives of others on a matter), help to reinforce the very certainties and hegemonies they supposedly wish to undermine. Instead of “certain because it corresponds to evidence”, we are left with the feeling of certainty about my own and my group or culture’s own narrative and perspective. There is value in challenging the “tyranny” of dominant narratives and perspectives, but an approach to truth that allows each his or her own “truth” in fact does nothing to address the competing truth claims of the tyrannical, of the bigoted, of the torturers. If claims to objectivity have been used to dominate, claims to radical and absolute uncertainty leave only power to decide who wins, and that does not represent progress. Nor does the pop-pomo perspective offer help to those who, inevitably being deluded, might deeply desire to become less so, even if they can never hope to be entirely free from the constraints of that old adage, “to err is human”.

The alternative is to quest for absolute truth, or at least for objectivity or impartiality, while humbly acknowledging that our own understanding will inevitably not correspond perfectly to the way things really are (or were, for those of us working in historical studies). If there is no “view from nowhere”, and the “view from anywhere” leaves little room for anything other than contentment for each of us in our own isolated ignorance, what we need is the “view from everywhere” – or at least, the view from as many places as possible. It is through the adoption of critical realism, and an openness to hearing the stories and perspectives of others without assuming beforehand either that theirs is good for them and mine is good for me, or that I am right and they are wrong, that will allow us to continue to learn and grow in understanding, while avoiding the shortcomings and pitfalls of the approach characteristic of modernity.

Of course, that’s just my perspective on this subject. But past experience leads me to think that it is possible not only to change one’s mind, but to learn, by which I mean improving one’s knowledge about the way things really are, and not simply adding the delusions of others to one’s own collection.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 12, 2009

Quote of the Day (Denis Diderot)

Next Post

May 13, 2009 The Evolution of God

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Samuel 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy academia Acts of the Apostles afterlife Akhaten Alcatraz American Academy of Religion Amos Anglican Arabic Aramaic archaeology art artificial intelligence astronomy atheism atonement Babylon 5 Baptists Battlestar Galactica Bible Biblical Studies Carnival biblioblogging Black Mirror Blade Runner Book of Job book review Buddhism Call for Papers China Christianity Christmas Christology Chronicles Coptic creation Daniel Deuteronomy Doctor Who Dune Easter Ecclesiastes economics education Eldad Keynan Enoch Seminar Ephesians eschatology Esther Evangelicals evolution Exodus Expanse Ezekiel Ezra fantasy Fringe fundamentalism Galatians games Ge'ez genealogy Genesis Gnosticism Gospel of Jesus' Wife Gospel of John Gospel of Judas Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Peter Gospel of Thomas Greek Harry Potter Hebrew Hebrews Hinduism historical Jesus history Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Holidays horror Hosea humor incarnation India inerrancy information literacy inspirational Intelligent Design Ireland Isaiah Islam Israel Italy James Jeremiah John the Baptist Jonah Joshua Judaism Jude Judges Judith Lamentations languages Latin Leviticus libraries literature Lord of the Rings LOST Mandaeans Mandaic memes Methodism Micah monotheism morality Mormons movies music mythicism NASSCAL Nehemiah new perspective New Testament news Numbers Orthodox paganism panentheism pantheism Patheos Paul and his letters Pentecostals Philippians Philippians 2:6-11 philosophy physics Planet of the Apes podcast politics Progressive Christianity Protestantism Proverbs Psalms pseudoscience racism religion Revelation Roman Catholicism Romania Romans Ruth scams science science fiction Secret Gospel of Mark Society of Biblical Literature Song of Songs Star Trek Star Wars Stargate Swahili Syriac Taoism technology Terminator The Handmaid's Tale The Hobbit The Matrix theodicy theology theory Timeless Titus tomb Torchwood travel TRON Uncategorized United Kingdom Westworld X-Files young-earth creationism Zechariah

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 February 2007 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz