The Cut Flower Culture

Last updated on: August 25, 2022 at 11:12 am by Richard E. Simmons III

The Cut Flower Culture 2022-08-25T11:12:50-06:00 Richard E. Simmons III

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I am continually amazed at the contradictory nature of the secular worldview that rules our land, particularly when it comes to morality. Randy Newman, who is a Senior Fellow for Apologetics at the C.S. Lewis Institute, says that we are a “cut flower culture.”

Newman says:

“When we buy a bouquet of flowers, they are cut off from their roots. We bring them home and put them in water and enjoy their beauty—but only for a short time. Sooner or later, because of their lack of rootedness in a source of nutrients and life, they die. In fact, the dying process begins as soon as the flower is cut. But for a time, they still appear vibrant and alive. Such is the case in our culture when it comes to morality and sin. We have cut ourselves off from biblical roots that support morality, but we still want (to some extent) the fruit of that morality. We hear it most painfully when people who have separated sex from marriage lament that their current bed partner cheated on them.”

So how do people in our modern world determine what is moral? Max Hocutt, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Alabama says:

“The fundamental question of ethics is, who makes the rules? God or men? The theistic answer is that God makes them. The humanistic answer is that men make them. This distinction between theism and humanism is the fundamental division in moral theory.”

Hocutt is correct. The problem then becomes if morals and ethics are determined by men, who makes these decisions? Who determines how we ought to live? How should we conduct our lives? What is moral, what is immoral?

If there is a God who has given us absolute morals to live by, then we have moral authority to live under. However, if we reject God and look to mankind to determine our morals, we find ourselves morally confused, and having to deal with a massive contradiction.

Over 30 years ago I wrote my first book, Remembering the Forgotten God, and in it I paraphrased some words of G.K. Chesterton into more modern language to help people understand this great contradiction.

The atheist, who believes that religion is an illusion at best and a fraud at worst, should stop and take a long, hard look at the foundations of his intellectual positions. After years of reflecting upon the conflicting beliefs of atheism and theism, I have made the decision that a belief in atheism presents an insurmountable contradiction.

Atheism tells me that God is dead, and therefore love is dead, morality is dead, and human life has no value. The contradiction is revealed when the atheist is not able to live a life consistent with the world he professes to believe in. A modern atheistic biology professor, for example, may complain that blacks in South Africa are treated as beasts, but later, in biology class, he presents the belief that men are merely sophisticated beasts, the product of an irrefutable evolutionary process. An atheistic political scientist attacks oppressive government for trampling on the inalienable rights of man, while, in the same breath, he will deny that there is a moral imperative dictated by a transcendent reality. The atheist allows that natural selection is the supreme law of nature, but then curses the fascist or the tyrant for living by the principles derived by this law.

The twentieth century atheist claims that there is no such thing as love, and yet he loves. He says there is no beauty, yet he continues to be enamored by sunsets. One day he will tell you that because there is no God, there are no absolutes; therefore, justice and cruelty have no meaning. The next evening, while watching the news, he will rail against the unjust and cruel governments of the world.

Therein lies the great contradiction. It is intellectually interesting to argue there is no absolute moral law for us to live by, but it falls flat when confronted with reality and honesty.

It is particularly difficult to live a wise, consistent life when you have no moral compass to follow. People think all they must do is follow their hearts and desires, yet what is one to do when the heart and the desires are uncertain? We need an anchor so that we can be morally grounded. This is clearly what the Christian worldview provides.

Richard E Simmons III is the founder and Executive Director of The Center for Executive Leadership and a best-selling author.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 19, 2022

The Triple-A Formula

Next Post

September 2, 2022 What Has Ultimate Value?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Character Development Inspiration Leadership Life Purpose Personal Growth Relationships Seeking God Spiritual Truth The Bible True Masculinity Uncategorized Wisdom

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many loaves in the feeding miracle?

Select your answer to see how you score.

5 7 12 3