Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Careers, Workplace and Religion
Finland’s Educational System Works. Why? Because of Subsidiarity and Sphere Sovereignty.

Finland’s Educational System Works. Why? Because of Subsidiarity and Sphere Sovereignty.

Last updated on: March 29, 2016 at 9:04 am by Bob Robinson

Finland’s Educational System Works. Why? Because of Subsidiarity and Sphere Sovereignty. 2016-03-26T10:53:48-04:00 Bob Robinson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

school_supplies In a recent Op-Ed piece, William Doyle, an American who recently accepted a position as Lecturer on Media and Education at the University of Eastern Finland, wrote about his extremely positive experience with the Finland public education system.

“For five months, my wife, my son and I experienced a stunningly stress-free, and stunningly good, school system. Finland has a history of producing the highest global test scores in the Western world, as well as a trophy case full of other recent No. 1 global rankings, including most literate nation.”

Doyle explains further:

“In class, children are allowed to have fun, giggle and daydream from time to time. Finns put into practice the cultural mantras I heard over and over: ‘Let children be children,’ ‘The work of a child is to play,’ and ‘Children learn best through play.’

The emotional climate of the typical classroom is warm, safe, respectful and highly supportive. There are no scripted lessons and no quasi-martial requirements to walk in straight lines or sit up straight.”

Finland’s education system is a perfect Case Study for the Christian Social Theories of “Subsidiarity” (Catholic) and “Sphere Sovereignty” (Neo-Calvinism).

Better than the Top-Down Approach

The principle of Subsidiarity is that public institutions closest to the needs are best suited for meeting those needs. Rather than a top-down approach, Subsidiarity stresses that those who are more local and more intimately involved are better suited to know and meet needs. This principle pushes authority down from the national government toward local authority. When local authority fails in those duties (and only when that happens), broader more national government then needs to step in.

Doyle contrasts the United States to Finland.

“In the United States, teachers are routinely degraded by politicians, and thousands of teacher slots are filled by temps with six or seven weeks of summer training. In Finland teachers are the most trusted and admired professionals next to doctors, in part because they are required to have master’s degrees in education with specialization in research and classroom practice”

In a report that appeared in The Smithsonian Magazine in 2011, Lynnell Hancock wrote,

“By the mid-1980s, a final set of initiatives shook the classrooms (in Finland) free from the last vestiges of top-down regulation. Control over policies shifted to town councils. The national curriculum was distilled into broad guidelines.”

Better to Let the People Who Know Best Actually Run Things

The principal of Sphere Sovereignty states that God places institutions in society’s spheres as the primary authorities (sovereigns) over those spheres of responsibility. Each sphere in society needs to be handled primarily by the specialists in those institutions that are best suited to do so. Thus, education is best done by educators. Medicine is best done by medical specialists. Families are best run by parents. Business is best done by businesspeople. Labor is best done by labor unions. Government is best done by governmental specialists. Etc. And one of the government’s primary responsibilities is to keep institutions from one sphere from infringing on the authority of institutions in other spheres (for instance, business should not be telling education how to educate, etc.)

In a 2011 article in The Atlantic, Anu Partanen reported that Finland has no standardized tests with the only exception being the National Matriculation Exam. Partanen writes,

“Instead, (Finland’s) public school system’s teachers are trained to assess children in classrooms using independent tests they create themselves. All children receive a report card at the end of each semester, but these reports are based on individualized grading by each teacher.”

Or as Doyle reports that one Finnish childhood education professor told him:

“Our mission as adults is to protect our children from politicians… We also have an ethical and moral responsibility to tell businesspeople to stay out of our building.”

In fact, any Finnish citizen is free to visit any school whenever they like, but her message was clear: Educators are the ultimate authorities on education, not bureaucrats, and not technology vendors.

What can we learn from Finland that we can apply here in the United States?

Image by Nick Amoscato. Used with permission. Sourced via Flickr.

Previous Post

March 22, 2016

“Give us a king to lead us!” And they got Trump.

Next Post

April 12, 2016 Work is a Part of the Good Creation

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category arts and entertainment audio/video bible / theology business church college community culture education faith family government/politics leadership media medicine podcast science & tech social sector tech Uncategorized work and calling

Select a Month November 2025 May 2025 October 2024 September 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 July 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 July 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which writer besides Solomon and David contributed to Proverbs?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nathan Agur Moses Asaph