Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Careers, Workplace and Religion
Kingdom of God: Is it Bigger than the Church?

Kingdom of God: Is it Bigger than the Church?

Last updated on: September 18, 2015 at 3:46 pm by Bob Robinson

Kingdom of God: Is it Bigger than the Church? 2015-09-18T15:46:57-04:00 Bob Robinson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

tree in desert Sixth in a series on the Kingdom of God.

For many in the Reformed tradition, especially those who follow in the footsteps of Abraham Kuyper, God’s sovereign rule extends over every aspect of life. What this means, for these folks, is that the kingdom of God is not limited to the church. Richard Mouw writes,

“Kuyper makes much of the fact that the Kingdom of Christ is much bigger than the institutional church. The Kingdom is that broad range of reality over which Christ rules. Actually, Christ’s Kingdom is the whole cosmos — remember Kuyper’s manifesto about every square inch of the creation belonging to Jesus.” (Mouw, Abraham Kuyper: A Short and Personal Introduction)

What, then, do Kuyperians like Mouw say concerning the church?

“The institutional church is certainly an important part of Christ’s Kingdom. It is where we as believers gather to worship — where we are shaped by the preaching of the Word, by participation in sacraments, by instruction in the church’s traditions and teachings, and by less formal patterns of fellowship.” (Mouw, Abraham Kuyper: A Short and Personal Introduction, p. 57)

So it’s not, as some often caricature Kuyperians, that they have a low view of church.

But Mouw wants to make it clear that he believes that the kingdom of God is bigger than the church. Mouw continues:

“But the church is only one part of the Kingdom. And it is no trivial thing to point that out. I once heard a prominent pastor complain from the pulpit about lay people — he used the example of Christians in the business community—who don’t give enough of their time to church activities. This is how he put it: ‘These folks work all day at their marketplace jobs, and then they go home and watch television. Other than coming to Sunday services,’ he said, ‘they don’t seem to care about Kingdom activities!’ Kuyper would have been horrified by that statement — as I was. The pastor was equating church and Kingdom, as if the two terms were interchangeable. Kuyper would urge business people to see their places of work as providing important opportunities for Kingdom service.” (Mouw, Abraham Kuyper, p. 57)

But calling the Christian’s work for the sake of cultural influence “kingdom service” is what makes certain theologians uncomfortable. Critics of Kuyperian theology counter that the church is God’s primary means (and some would say the only means) for accomplishing His mission in the world, not just one of many “spheres” in society or one of many “institutions” in a particular community.

Push-Back from Scot McKnight

Scot McKnight has no problem with the Kuyperian notion of influencing culture in the various spheres, for he sees that as bringing the church to bear on society.

“The Christian’s calling is to serve God and in so doing to influence each sphere toward the kingdom of God (for Scot, this means “toward the church”), efforts which will both strengthen each sphere and simultaneously prevent the government from extending its reach and control… When individual Christians work within the confines of a given sphere to make the rule of Christ visible, they are in the kingdom and doing kingdom work.” (Kingdom Conspiracy, p. 233)

However, he has issues with the Kuyperian concept of “Sphere Sovereignty,” for it reduces the church to just one of many spheres in society that God rules over, where his Anabaptist view sees the church as totally separate from all the spheres in the world. He sees the church as the kingdom of God, while everything else are parts of the world in rebellion to the king.

Anabaptists like Scot McKnight believe that when Christian mission is defined as “Christ the transformer of culture” (as H. Richard Niebuhr called it) it ultimately slides into Constantinian Christendom, for they see all attempts to change culture as naturally devolving toward political means. Scot makes this sweeping claim:

“The Christian influence theory is a kind of Constantinianism. Insider talk calls it ‘salt and light,’ but in the public sector it is called working for the common good, and sometimes it is called ‘kingdom work.’ Ironically, in calling social agitation for Christian values in the public sector ‘kingdom work,’ the Christian joins hands with Constantinianism itself, for it equates ‘kingdom’ with ‘state.’ Winning in the Christian influence theory is getting the state to back up the Christian voice. Do we see what this means? It means we give the final authority to the state.” (Kingdom Conspiracy, p. 217)

Kingdom Work and Christ’s Church

McKnight warns that a Kuyperian view has evolved into Niebuhr’s “Christ transforming culture” which has now evolved into something akin to liberation theology, which separates “kingdom work” from Christ’s church. What he sees in Kuyperianism today is a tendency toward a re-emerging social gospel, where the kingdom of God is about changing the world.

“One wonders at times if kingdom theology for many is religious language used to baptize what to most other observers is merely good actions done by decent people for the common good.” (Kingdom Conspiracy, 254)

This indeed is the direction many have gone. In a recent book, Reggie McNeal lists things like these as examples of kingdom work:

A ‘million meal’ packathon is being sponsored by a local food bank.
An art auction benefits a family shelter.
A congregation adopts a nearby elementary school in order to provide mentors, building and grounds beautification, and school supplies.
A symphony orchestra offers a concert of Brahms and Beethoven.

McNeal says,

“Some of these efforts involve the faith community. Many do not. Some are individual efforts, and others involve large organizations or collaborations between multiple groups. A number of projects are administered by agencies that do ongoing work in these areas, but many of the initiatives are the product of one person’s passion or idea. What all of these have in common, though is this: people helping people to experience life as God intends it. This has been the kingdom story from the very beginning.” (Reggie McNeal, Kingdom Come, pp. 39-41)

Questions: If Jesus the King and his kingdom people are not involved, how can we call it “kingdom work?” If it is benevolence done by anybody for any motive, is it a manifestation of the kingdom of God? When are good works for the common good secular and when are they sacred, or is this a false dualism?

James K. A. Smith wrote this concern not too long ago.

“In strange, often unintended ways, the pursuit of ‘justice,’ shalom, and a ‘holistic’ gospel can have its own secularizing effect. What begins as a Gospel-motivated concern for justice can turn into a naturalized fixation on justice in which God never appears. And when that happens, ‘justice’ becomes something else altogether—an idol, a way to effectively naturalize the gospel, flattening it to a social amelioration project in which the particularity of Jesus as the revelation of God becomes strangely absent.” (James K.A. Smith, “Naturalizing ‘Shalom’: Confessions of a Kuyperian Secularist”)

McKnight has observed this problem and sees it as another basis for criticism of the Kuyperian understanding of the kingdom of God. He writes,

“Ironically enough, many proponents in the transformation approach are leading one Christian after another out of the church to do kingdom work in the public sector because it perceives over and over the kingdom as larger than the church. Its framing story is that the kingdom is cosmic and speaks of the universal rule of God in this world. One can therefore do kingdom work and have nothing to do with the church. Kingdom work, in other words, has become good things Christians do in the public sector, and church work is what Christian people do within the confines of the church.” (Kingdom Conspiracy, 254-255).

I’ve got to agree with Scot on this.

I’ve seen this first-hand in young zealous evangelical Christians, driven to change the world by doing what they call, “kingdom work.” As long as people are brought closer toward flourishing, they believe it is the kingdom of God. But I have seen (not always, but often enough to cause me concern) not enough intention to proclaim to people that Jesus is the King.

It is indeed ironic.

For in an attempt to move away from the truncated gospel that says that our mission in the world is to participate with God in saving individual souls from their sin so they can go to heaven, they create another truncated gospel, one that says our mission in the world is to participate with God in his alleviation of suffering and bringing about wholeness in life

Next: I conclude this series on the Kingdom of God with a “Both/And” solution to the Kingdom of God debates.

Image by Ian Sane. Used with permission. Sourced via Flickr.

Previous Post

September 15, 2015

On Kim Davis: Is This the Best We Can Do?

Next Post

September 19, 2015 Quotable Saturdays: Newbigin - Where Christians Witness

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category arts and entertainment audio/video bible / theology business church college community culture education faith family government/politics leadership media medicine podcast science & tech social sector tech Uncategorized work and calling

Select a Month November 2025 May 2025 October 2024 September 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 July 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 July 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name of the lake into which the beast and false prophet are thrown?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The outer darkness The abyss The lake of burning sulfur (lake of fire) Gehenna