Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Careers, Workplace and Religion
Kingdom of God: Why “Already / Not Yet” is Not Enough

Kingdom of God: Why “Already / Not Yet” is Not Enough

Last updated on: September 4, 2015 at 6:29 am by Bob Robinson

Kingdom of God: Why “Already / Not Yet” is Not Enough 2015-09-03T22:32:31-04:00 Bob Robinson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

For much of the 20th Century, Dispensationalists taught that the kingdom is strictly a future event. My first Bible was the Ryrie Study Bible. I loved that Bible! I still own it (though I haven’t opened it in over ten years).

Charles Ryrie was a leading theologian in the Dispensational movement in the late 20th Century. In his book, A Survey of Bible Doctrine (Chicago: Moody Press, 1972), he explains the Dispensational view of the kingdom:

“The millennial kingdom is that period of 1,000 years during which our Lord Jesus Christ will rule the earth in righteousness and will fulfill to the Jews and the world those promises of the Old Testament covenants.”

Amillennialists refuted the idea of a future kingdom, insisting

(God’s rule) “is going on now, and will be until Christ returns. Hence the term realized millennialism is an apt description of (this) view…if it is remembered that the millennium in question is not an earthly but a heavenly reign.”[1]

Then Along Came George Eldon Ladd

While doing his doctoral studies at Harvard, George Eldon Ladd studied the kingdom debates in Germany. Beginning in 1964, with the first publication of Jesus and the Kingdom (later retitled The Presence of the Future: The Eschatology of Biblical Realism). he advocated the German construct of “Already/Not Yet.”

Ladd wrote,

“The Kingdom of God is the redemptive reign of God dynamically active to establish his rule among men…This Kingdom, which will appear as an apocalyptic act at the end of the age, has already come into human history in the person and mission of Jesus to overcome evil, to deliver men from its power, and to bring them into the blessings of God’s reign. The Kingdom of God involves two great moments: fulfillment within history (already), and consummation at the end of history (not yet)”[2]

For Ladd, the kingdom of God manifests itself in two stages: The “already” of God’s reign in the lives of Christians, and the “not yet” of when God will rule over the full realm of the cosmos. What God’s people experience spiritually now is a prolepsis of the fullness that will be experienced when Christ returns.

The Inner Rule of God in Individual Hearts?

Ladd’s view is an example of the interior kingdom (see my previous post where I delineate the 8 very different ways various Christians view the kingdom of God), where the manifestation of God’s rule in our present day is not in the realm of the material created cosmos. Rather, for Ladd, it is the dynamic redemptive-rule in the hearts of individuals.

If Ladd’s view of the kingdom of God is correct, then the mission of God’s people is to proclaim a gospel that God is to be the ruler of each person individually in the present as a means for guaranteeing the bliss of entering into the King’s material rule/realm in the future, when the internal spiritual experience will come to consummation in the more external tangible experience.

You may not have ever heard of George Eldon Ladd, but it can’t be understated the influence he has had on American evangelical Christianity.

“In a 1984 survey that Mark Noll sent to members of the Evangelical Theological Society (ETS) and the Institute for Biblical Research (IBR), Noll asked, ‘Please list the three individuals, living or dead, who have exerted the dominant influence on your scholarly work. You do not have to share the conclusions of these individuals but they should be the ones whose work influences you most.’ For ETS members, the number one individual was John Calvin. Number two was George Ladd. For IBR members, number one was George Ladd.”[3]

While the “Already/Not Yet” construct has been helpful to help us understand that the kingdom of God can be both present and future, it raises other tensions:

Is the kingdom of God individual or social?
Is the kingdom particular to the church or does it include the entire cosmos?

Ladd’s formula for the kingdom of God did this:

The kingdom “Already” is God ruling individual Christians in the church who have submitted to the lordship of Christ in their lives
The kingdom “Not Yet” is when God’s rule will actually be manifested in social order and in he redemption of the entire cosmos.

Scot McKnight, in his recent book, Kingdom Conspiracy: Returning to the Radical Mission of the Local Church, summarizes Ladd’s take:

“The word ‘kingdom,’ then, is not a place or a space or a realm or a people with boundaries and kings and a temple. No, ‘kingdom’ refers to the abstract dynamic that God is now at work redeeming individuals in Jesus Christ in this world, and this rule in Jesus Christ will be completed and universal at the eschaton when the kingdom arrives fully.”[4]

What About Redeemed Community?

While it cannot be denied that Jesus Christ’s lordship includes the redemptive-rule of Christ over individual Christians, Ladd’s proposal does not emphasize God’s call on these individuals into redeemed community.

It also does not provide a theological foundation for God’s people to participate with God in his mission for the redemption or reconciliation of the entirety of his creation. (More on this in the next post).

What do you think? Is the present manifestation of the kingdom of God primarily or even exclusively about God’s rule in the hearts of individual believers? Is the kingdom also about his authority over the entirety of the created cosmos? Should God’s rule also include other aspects of this present world? Is God the Lord of business? Of education? Of the arts? Of governing? In what ways?

Notes

[1] Anthony A. Hoekema, The Bible and the Future (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1979),

[2] George Eldon Ladd, The Presence of the Future: The Eschatology of Biblical Realism, Reprint edition (Grand Rapids, Mich: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1996).

[3] Andrew David Naselli, “Three Reflections on Evangelical Academic Publishing,” in Themelios, Volume 39, Issue 3, ed. D. A. Carson (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2014).

[4] Scot McKnight, Kingdom Conspiracy: Returning to the Radical Mission of the Local Church (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Brazos Press, 2014), 13.

Image by Gemma Bou. Used with permission. Sourced via Flickr.

Previous Post

August 31, 2015

8 Very Different Ways to View the Kingdom of God

Next Post

September 5, 2015 Quotable Saturdays: Halverson, "Wherever you are, God has put you there."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category arts and entertainment audio/video bible / theology business church college community culture education faith family government/politics leadership media medicine podcast science & tech social sector tech Uncategorized work and calling

Select a Month November 2025 May 2025 October 2024 September 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 July 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 July 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Abraham was 100 years old when Isaac was born.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE