Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Careers, Workplace and Religion
Neo-Dortian? Neo-Puritan? Neo-Nuff?

Neo-Dortian? Neo-Puritan? Neo-Nuff?

Last updated on: June 27, 2014 at 3:17 pm by Bob Robinson

Neo-Dortian? Neo-Puritan? Neo-Nuff? 2014-06-27T15:17:13-04:00 Bob Robinson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So I wrote this post last month on why the “New Calvinism” (the young, restless, and Reformed group) should not be called “Neo-Calvinism” – that Neo-Calvinism sees the Gospel as the redemption of all creation while this new group sees the Gospel as the salvation of individuals.

See “So What’s Wrong with Neo-Calvinism?”

In “Naming the New Calvinism,” Timothy Paul Jones, Associate Professor of Leadership and Church Ministry at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, has written a post that helps this conversation move forward. He writes,

The relatively recent introduction of “neo-Calvinist” to describe the latest resurgence of interest in Reformation theology has muddied the semantic waters even more—but not because “neo-Calvinist” or “new Calvinist” carries too many different meanings (not yet, anyway). It’s because, at least since the early twentieth century, “neo-Calvinist” has described the views of Dutch Reformed theologians who emphasized the lordship of Christ over all creation and the capacity of grace to restore nature. It was neo-Calvinist Abraham Kuyper who famously declared, “There is not one square inch in the whole domain of human existence over which Christ, who is sovereign over all, does not declare, ‘Mine!’”

To identify the current Reformation-oriented crowd as “neo-Calvinist” is to confuse a venerable movement that focuses on God’s sovereignty over creation with a current movement that focuses on God’s sovereignty in salvation. The result is a blurred definition that does disservice to persons in each group, especially since some of us do theology in ways that derive in different ways from both movements.

And then he takes issue with my use of the title “Neo-Puriatan” to identify these new Calvinists.

“Neo-Puritan,” perhaps the most misguided of all the recent monikers, would multiply the muddiness even more. Reformed theology was never the primary factor in setting the limits of Puritanism. “Puritan” has historically included not only Christians who profess Reformed soteriology but also at least a few Arminians and—depending on who you ask—perhaps even Quakers.

What Timothy Paul Jones would rather us realize is that this new group of Calvinists are getting their cues from the Synod of Dort. The “Five Points of Calvinism” (Commonly known as “TULIP”) were codified in the canons of Dort, and when this happened, according to Jones, it disconnected the Reformed theology of salvation (i.e., soteriology) from the rest of the Covenant theology associated with the Calvinists. Thus, people could embrace Reformed teachings on soteriology without having to subscribe to the the Confessions and Catechisms of the Reformed traditions. Jones makes a great point when he says,

Of course, the Reformed pastors at the synod of Dort never intended their summary of Reformed soteriology to stand alone. The five points in the canons of Dort were designed to serve as a soteriological clarification, standing as one of the Three Forms of Unity alongside the Belgic Confession and Heidelberg Catechism. That’s why one scholar has declared, “It would be a major error–both historically and doctrinally–if the five points of Calvinism were understood as the sole or even the absolutely primary basis for identifying someone as holding Calvinistic or Reformed faith.”

But you see, this is exactly what these new Calvinists are doing! They have defined the Gospel solely in terms of soteriology. To these folks, the Gospel is primarily about salvation. What Neo-Calvinists insist is this:

The Gospel is about God’s redemption of his entire Creation. The means by which this is done is through the salvation of people, but the ultimate goal is not to see individuals blissfully worshiping God in heaven. The telos is for God to be the Lord of all creation, with every knee bowed before Him as we live in a new heaven and new earth. It is, quite simply, the consummation of God’s kingdom.

Timothy Paul Jones also offers a working diagram trying to differentiate the different streams of Calvinism that I think is very helpful. Check it out here.

Feature Image by Bob Robinson

Previous Post

June 27, 2014

Satisfaction in Work

Next Post

July 1, 2014 Common Grace for the Common Good

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category arts and entertainment audio/video bible / theology business church college community culture education faith family government/politics leadership media medicine podcast science & tech social sector tech Uncategorized work and calling

Select a Month November 2025 May 2025 October 2024 September 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 July 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 July 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

To which king did Isaiah deliver the prophecy of 15 extra years of life?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Ahab Manasseh Hezekiah