Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Rebecca Florence Miller

Home
Evangelical
Show Me a Hero: HBO’s Zeitgeisty Historical Miniseries Deals with Housing Desegregation in the ’80s

Show Me a Hero: HBO’s Zeitgeisty Historical Miniseries Deals with Housing Desegregation in the ’80s

Last updated on: August 26, 2015 at 8:00 pm by Rebecca Florence Miller

Show Me a Hero: HBO’s Zeitgeisty Historical Miniseries Deals with Housing Desegregation in the ’80s 2015-08-26T20:00:52-06:00 Rebecca Florence Miller

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

And let me say: those meetings… They are utterly cringe-worthy. They are like Facebook comment threads today come to life, out loud. People say things I’ve definitely heard before, but usually said online rather than to my face. Like this from a resident: “We’re not prejudiced. We just object to giving housing subsidies in an area where people have worked so hard to afford their home.” Read: poor people (particularly poor people of color) don’t work hard. They’re good for nothing and will destroy the neighborhood. The yelling and ranting and cheering one another’s xenophobia on in the council meetings is deeply uncomfortable to watch. Without sensationalizing and dehumanizing the white residents of Yonkers, it holds a mirror up to the white community. “How do you like how you really look?” it asks.

And there are lots of scenes in the city council meetings; they all reminded me of that episode of This American Life that I referenced above. When the council finally votes to cooperate with Judge Sand’s order, the riot that ensues made me wonder who the real “thugs” and criminals are. It’s shockingly true that some white people (like all people) can get insanely angry when things don’t go their way.

The problem with trying to locate crime as an inner-city, black-person phenomenon is that it ignores the shocking reality of sin that beats within one’s own breast. The more blind we are to our own fallibility, the more it is allowed to run amuck. When sin and disorder are merely “out there,” instead of also “in here,” we can become guilty of shocking acts against our neighbors.

Wasicsko’s moral awakening is slow. Even in the third episode, when he has begun to back the implementation of Judge Sand’s order, he is in many ways doing it because it’s a good political bet, not primarily because it is morally right. When he says, “I think for the first time in my life, I am on the right side of something–and I am all alone,” he’s rightly expressing that he’s being politically courageous, but he’s doing it because he believes people are going to wake up and see that the opposition is bankrupting the town and hurting its people–and he’s going to end up on the politically advantageous side.

But something happens along the way. Somewhere along the way, what is mostly a political calculation of what is right for the city and for Wasicsko as a politician becomes a moral cause for him. In the fourth episode, we see how far he’s traveled when he says this:

You will never hear Jack O’Toole utter a racist phrase, ’cause guys like that, they learn how not to say the bad words. … Nothing out of his mouth that’ll give it away, you know? It’s all property values and life and liberty and people only living where they can afford it and all that talk. But underneath it all, it’s fear. Same as it ever was. I played into that fear too. When I got in for mayor, I did. It chewed me up.”

Wasicsko paid a big political price for backing Judge Sand’s order, but over time his courageous choice helps him to grow in moral character. He learned what one person says to another, “How do you know a hero in Yonkers? When they make you pay for it.”

There are still two episodes yet to be released in this riveting miniseries. I’ve been challenged and convicted by it. I’m most appreciative of the fact that the central character is not a cleaned-up white guy who has an unwavering record in regards to people of color. Rather, he’s a guy more like the rest of us: somebody who starts out really not getting it but slowly begins to understand the reality of injustice against the black and Latino community. He becomes a hero, but he’s a flawed one. And for those who know the history of Wasicsko’s life, we know there is tragedy ahead.

It’s worth noting that all the acting is really fantastic. Oscar Isaac’s performance as Wasicsko is completely believable and compelling, and Carla Quevedo’s turn as his beloved wife Nay Noe holds together the heart of the film. The Springsteen-infused soundtrack drops us back in the past even as we examine issues that remain entirely contemporary. In regards to the music, Chris Ryan writes in Grantland, “According to Haggis, it was a postproduction decision to include these songs, but it’s hard to imagine the same show without them. These songs function as a kind of emotional shorthand — they speak when people are too busy to really talk.” The writing is also extremely good, nuanced, interesting, and replete in well-executed foreshadowing.

This miniseries is entirely worth your time.

For more on the history of segregated housing in America, check out this source. Also, read this excellent interview with David Simon and Cory Booker about the show and the important issues within it.

——————-

Community discussion guidelines:

Because this is a Christian blog, the things I’m talking about will obviously be topics that people feel strongly about in one direction or another. Please keep in mind that this is a place for substantive, respectful, constructive conversation. All perspectives are welcome to discuss here as long as all can treat each other with kindness and respect. Please ignore trolls, refuse to engage in personal attacks, try not to derail the conversation into divisive rabbit trails, and observe the comment policy listed on the right side of the page. Comments that violate these guidelines may be deleted. Vulgar remarks may result in immediate blacklisting. For those who clearly violate these policies repeatedly, my policy is to issue a warning which, if not regarded, may lead to blacklisting. This is not about censorship, but about creating a healthy, respectful environment for discussion.

P.S. Please also note that I am not a scientist, but a person with expertise in theology and the arts. While I am very interested in the relationship between science and faith, I do not believe I personally will be able to adequately address the many questions that inevitably come up related to science and religion. I encourage you to seek out the writings of theistic or Christian scientists to help with those discussions.

———————-

Photo source: IMDB.com

Previous Post

August 20, 2015

Straight Outta Compton: Some Truth, But Too Much Hagiography

Next Post

September 15, 2015 Patriots (Not Pinheads) and the Right Side of History: Racism and Self-Justification

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Charis Christian Witness Church Year Conversation Creativity Cultural Engagement Curiosity Current Events Film Jesus Lectionary Message Literature Lutheran Theology Politics Story Television Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz