The Saddening, Dangerous Remarks of Franklin Graham

Last updated on: July 20, 2015 at 4:13 pm by Rebecca Florence Miller

The Saddening, Dangerous Remarks of Franklin Graham 2015-07-20T16:13:33-06:00 Rebecca Florence Miller

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

5. Graham is evoking one of the darker pages from our national history and somehow designating it a positive example.

In an article on the Gilder-Lehrman Institute of American History website, Steven Mintz writes:

The day after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt suspended naturalization proceedings for Italian, German, and Japanese immigrants, required them to register, restricted their mobility, and prohibited them from owning items that might be used for sabotage, such as cameras and shortwave radios. …

Mintz goes on to say that Italian and German aliens and U.S. citizens owing their heritage to Italy and Germany, as well as some Bulgarians, Czechs, Hungarians and Romanians were placed in internment camps. Furthermore, anti-Semitism within the United States itself was at such a height that the United States sought to bar even Jewish refugee children from coming to the United States. Mintz writes:

Reflecting a nasty strain of anti-Semitism, Congress in 1939 refused to raise immigration quotas to admit 20,000 Jewish children fleeing Nazi oppression. As the wife of the U.S. Commissioner of Immigration remarked at a cocktail party, “20,000 children would all too soon grow up to be 20,000 ugly adults.”

Following the invasion of Pearl Harbor, xenophobia reached such a height that President Franklin Roosevelt actually issued Executive Order 9066 in 1942, an order that allowed over 100,000 Japanese people (many of whom had been born in this country) to be sent to internment camps. Many were also unjustly deprived of property. Justice was finally brought about when President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. A press release from 2013, found on the National Archives website reports:

The law, which was preceded by a detailed historical study by a Congressional commission, judged the incarceration “a grave injustice” that was “motivated largely by racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.” It offered an apology and $20,000 in restitution to each survivor.

One would think the lessons of history would reveal that this was a fundamental violation of Constitutional rights–the deprivation of liberty without being charged with a crime. But why let the Constitution rule when you can have fear instead?

Instead of learning from history, Franklin Graham seems to be pushing us in a direction where we are doomed to repeat it. To be fair, Graham does not advocate internment camps as such, but if one is to so distrust all Muslims and view every one as a ticking time bomb, it’s a pretty easy step to make to move to internment camps and the deprivation of Constitutional rights.

Go back Continue Reading

Previous Post

July 6, 2015

Petition the Obama Administration on Behalf of South Sudan

Next Post

July 27, 2015 Creativity--and Goals for This Blog

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Charis Christian Witness Church Year Conversation Creativity Cultural Engagement Curiosity Current Events Film Jesus Lectionary Message Literature Lutheran Theology Politics Story Television Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz