The Media Has the Facts Wrong about State RFRAs, but We Christians Still Need to Repent

Last updated on: April 1, 2015 at 8:40 pm by Rebecca Florence Miller

The Media Has the Facts Wrong about State RFRAs, but We Christians Still Need to Repent 2015-04-01T20:40:01-06:00 Rebecca Florence Miller

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

While American Christians Are Not in Much Danger of Persecution, the RFRA Can Help Protect Americans Who Are

Now, while the law may in fact be a useful tool in a pluralistic society, I do want to be honest and fair about some of the motivation that appears to be pretty clearly behind the state RFRAs. It’s very likely that much of the motivation for creating such a law has arisen due to a misplaced fear that religious liberties (particularly of Christians) are under assault in the United States. For those who are either atheists or part of a minority religion, such a fear probably makes little to no sense. American Christians are often tremendously blind to their own religious privilege and to how much their own religion dominates other religious groups. They often tend to apply “religious freedom” selectively as well. Many Christians’ fear of Muslims and atheists in particular troubles me greatly, and I can see many ways in which fundamentalists attempt to restrict such groups’ freedom or to force their own religion to be dominate over such groups.

I do think there are some Christians who see a broader application for such laws, however. I have come to the conclusion that it is probably useful to back the law, provided one is prepared to accept its application broadly and not selectively. I’m not particularly worried about religious liberties in America, except really for those who are outside my dominant group. Because this law may be useful in service of my neighbor, unless someone can convince me otherwise, I feel safe in being supportive of it.

American Christians Might Have a Legal Case to Refuse Service to a Gay Wedding…

Now, to the elephant in the room: although the law itself is broad, the debate surrounding this law has largely related to the issue of gay weddings (although another hot button issue has been whether Catholics and others are obligated to provide contraception in health care coverage or services).

The question has arisen as to whether Christian vendors, photographers, and the like have a legal obligation to provide services to a gay couple at such an event. I am of two minds on this issue. I think such Christians might have a legal case to refuse service, since an event that goes against one’s beliefs is very different than whether one serves an individual. At the same time, as my readers and I have discussed previously, there are plenty of things that the Christian faith would call sinful that Christians facilitate all the time. If one is going to appeal to the Bible to argue they should not have to serve a gay couple, they probably would need to show they are not facilitating other sins. And that, of course, would be impossible.

I am grateful for our nation’s many wise judges who can carefully hear and analyze what the law says and decide how it applies. I support more court cases to further think these issues through and to help us better know how to live peacefully in a pluralistic society.

…But Refusing Service to a Gay Couple Lifts a Pharisaical Wish for Spiritual “Purity” over Love of Neighbor

So, maybe…maybe such Christians have a legal case. But are they acting as Christians should act? Are they being faithful to their principles and faithfully the example of their Master? Are they living the new life in Christ? I would submit for your consideration that they are not.

If the Church had acted with perfect love and kindness to our gay brothers and sisters, perhaps it would be fair to stand on principle. But when you consider our own shocking moral failures, our frequent bullying of and fear of gay people, our insistence that gay individuals must undergo reparative therapy, it is time to recognize that we have done significant harm to the gay community.

Go back Continue Reading

Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Repentance

Previous Post

March 27, 2015

How the Palm-Waving Religious Crowd Implicates Itself in the Crucifixion--and How God Refuses to Let Their Sin Have the Final Word

Next Post

March 31, 2015 Fierce Convictions: Karen Swallow Prior's Biography of Christian Social Reformer Hannah More

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Charis Christian Witness Church Year Conversation Creativity Cultural Engagement Curiosity Current Events Film Jesus Lectionary Message Literature Lutheran Theology Politics Story Television Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz