Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Radical Christian Millennial

What the Hell is Ta-Nehisi Coates Talking About?

Last updated on: September 21, 2017 at 10:49 am   by Christian Chiakulas

What the Hell is Ta-Nehisi Coates Talking About? 2017-09-21T10:49:46-04:00 Christian Chiakulas

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Forgive me, but I need to drag Ta-Nehisi Coates right quick.

The journalist, author, and intellectual recently published a provocatively-titled piece making the claim that Donald Trump is The First White President in The Atlantic. It is a (pretty long) excerpt from his upcoming book, We Were Eight Years in Power, a collection of essays on “race, Barack Obama’s presidency, and its jarring aftermath.”

Coates’s argument in the essay and, presumably, the book, is that Trump’s ideological commitment to and implicit reliance on white supremacy to get elected renders him the titular First White President.  While it is a good and important thing to call out Trump as a white supremacist (he is), this designation as the “first” only holds up if you don’t know anything at all about US history.

Trump Coates

America is and has always been a white supremacist nation.  Coates’s grasp of history is excellent as he traces the divergent paths of the white and black working classes in the United States, and he accurately and succinctly summarizes the former’s status as a labor aristocracy that keeps the proletariat divided (my language, not his).  The ruling classes of America have always striven to keep poor whites as racist as possible; if you focus their anger on people even worse off than them, they’ll never rebel against the people actually wearing the boot that’s on their neck.

Given Coates’s stellar historical analysis, it’s all the more baffling that he could come to the conclusion that Trump is somehow different than America’s many, many previous white supremacist presidents (all of them, honestly).

Theodore Roosevelt declared that “nine out of ten” Native Americans deserved to die, and that he “shouldn’t like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth.”  Andrew Jackson referred to them as an inferior race and said that they “must necessarily yield to the force of circumstances and ere long disappear.”  George Washington referred to them as “beasts of prey.”

Franklin Delano Roosevelt locked Japanese Americans in internment camps for being Japanese.  Eisenhower’s administration rounded up Mexican immigrants for deportation, keeping them locked in appalling conditions, as a part of a program literally named “Operation Wetback.”  Woodrow Wilson loved him some Klan.

I understand what Coates is trying to get at, but he either doesn’t know how to make his point or he’s being intentionally dishonest.  Trump is the first outwardly racist president of the modern era, but even putting it this way seeks to hide and legitimize the more covert white supremacy of the neoliberal era.

American society changed dramatically after the Civil Rights Movement and again after the collapse of the Soviet Union.  The former ostensibly made it no longer acceptable to be outwardly racist in polite society; the latter seemingly vindicated the neoliberal consensus that had emerged under Reagan.

Before the Civil Rights Movement, it was okay for a president to praise the Ku Klux Klan; afterwards, presidents would need to make their racism much more covert.  So it was with Reagan, who created the “welfare queen” racial stereotype, even though the woman it’s based on was white.  Ditto Clinton, whose crime bill and welfare reforms were racist as all get out, but because they didn’t use outwardly racist language, were accepted.  And this continued through Bush, whose horrific imperialist wars served to stir up nativism, xenophobia, and the worst parts of nationalism all at once whilst laying the groundwork for the destruction of inner-city schools that primarily serve black and brown children.

Even Barack Obama upheld white supremacy throughout his presidency; his financial policies completely failed to make a dent in the racial wealth gap (and actually may have made it worse), police militarization proliferated, and thousands more black and brown people in remote parts of the world were murdered.

And I’m pretty sure Coates knows all of this.  He wants to make the point (I think) that Trump is different from past presidents, that Trump’s presidency is fundamentally a reaction to Barack Obama’s.  All of that is true, but what does that say about Barack Obama and the neoliberal establishment that he represents?  What does it say about Bush, Clinton, and Reagan?

Most importantly, what does it say about America?

Trump is different than his predecessors of the modern era, but he fits perfectly within the earlier paradigm of white supremacy that has characterized most of this nation’s history.  He proves that the liberal identity politics of the neoliberal era have not and can not overcome white supremacy (and Coates correctly notes that “everything is identity politics”).

Ta-Nehisi Coates obviously knows more about the lived experience of black people under white supremacy than I do.  But in his efforts to portray Trump as a new, unique evil, he has implicitly let America off the hook for its history as a white supremacist settler-colonial state.  I don’t know his intentions in making such a spurious claim, but it’s not helpful.  Trump may be a turning point, but his brand of racism is not new.  America was never great.

History

Politics

Uncategorized

coates

racism

ta-nehisi coates

trump

white supremacy

Previous Post



September 20, 2017

No, Steve Chapman; The Unabomber Wasn't Right (And Neither Are You)

Next Post



October 2, 2017 Prefigurative Politics:  How Jesus Lived the Kingdom of God


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Activism Bible Communism Communism and Socialism Faith Historical Jesus History Justice Millennials Personal Politics The Kingdom of God Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I denounced Israel's opulent lifestyle—those who lie on beds of ivory and dine on choice lambs. What were they at ease in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Their palaces Their wealth Zion Their security

Related posts from Radical Christian Millennial

Progressive Christian

Here's Why Productivity Doesn't Raise Wages Anymore

Radical Christian Millennial

Progressive Christian

Free Speech is an Illusion: Why Leftists Silence

Radical Christian Millennial

Progressive Christian

No, Steve Chapman; The Unabomber Wasn't Right (And...

Radical Christian Millennial

Progressive Christian

Hurricane Harvey is God's Punishment for Capitalism

Radical Christian Millennial

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube