Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Radical Christian Millennial

Home
Progressive Christian
Towards A Non-Apocalyptic Jesus

Towards A Non-Apocalyptic Jesus

Last updated on: July 22, 2016 at 3:16 am by Christian Chiakulas

Towards A Non-Apocalyptic Jesus 2016-07-22T03:16:18-04:00 Christian Chiakulas

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We start by collecting the earliest and best-attested Kingdom sayings throughout the gospels; I have used those identified by John Dominic Crossan in his book “Jesus: The Life of A Mediterranean Jewish Peasant.” These are the sayings most likely to be authentic words of Jesus because, as Crossan puts it, they are the ones “where at least two independent sources claim the Kingdom expression” (Crossan 459). I have only included these sayings from what Crossan identifies as the first (earliest) stratum of material, which ends with Mark (or possible the Didache, see below) and includes the hypothetical Q document as well as the Gospel of Thomas.

Nag_Hammadi_Codex_II

Beginning of the Gospel of Thomas, found at Nag Hammadi in 1945

These sayings are, by name/general summary: Kingdom and Children, The Mustard Seed, Blessed the Poor, When and Where, Two as One, The Lord’s Prayer, Greater Than John, The Planted Weeds, The Pearl, The Leaven, and The Treasure.

These sayings can be divided into four categories regarding their eschatological implications: ambiguous, neutral, apocalyptic, and anti-apocalyptic (favoring a “realized eschatology”), plus a special fifth category that deserves special attention. By my judgment:

Kingdom and Children and Blessed the Poor are neutral;

Only The Treasure is ambiguous (this is one of Jesus’s most confusing parables, and the disparate versions in Matthew and Thomas don’t help);

Lord’s Prayer and The Planted Weeds are unambiguously apocalyptic;

Mustard Seed, Two as One, Greater than John, The Pearl, and The Leaven are anti-apocalyptic;

And finally When and Where is apocalyptic in some forms, anti-apocalyptic in others. This requires careful explanation and hinges on the term “Son of Man.”

Before we get to that, let us deal with the other two explicitly apocalyptic sayings, Lord’s Prayer and The Planted Weeds.

The Lord’s Prayer comes to us in three versions; one in Matthew, one in Luke, and a third in the Didache that is extremely similar to Matthew.

If we accept the two-source answer to the Synoptic Problem, which I along with most scholars generally do, it seems clear that Luke’s shorter version of the prayer, which lacks any apocalyptic connotations whatsoever, is earliest. Generally, shorter forms of sayings are earlier; writers are much more likely to add than subtract. Matthew, as I’ve noted, is by far the most apocalyptic of the Synoptic gospels, and it makes sense for him to have added a plea for the Kingdom to hurry up when he was adapting from Q. The inverse theory, that Luke used Matthew as a source, claims that Luke took the second petition away because Luke had an anti-apocalyptic bias. This may sound convincing unless you know that A.) Matthew had already intensified the apocalypticism of Mark, and B.) Luke preserves other apocalyptic sayings intact.

(Quick aside: this would suggest that the Didache is dependent on Matthew, or vice-versa, a minority but very plausible opinion. I’m fine with that).

So I take the apocalyptic reference in the Lord’s Prayer as a probable interpolation, and certainly as not going back to the historical Jesus. The Planted Weeds, found in Thomas 57 and Matthew 13:24-30, speaks of weeds being separated from the good wheat and burned at the time of harvest. It is an interesting addition to Thomas, which is generally anti-apocalyptic. In any case, Matthew shows his hand a few passages later, when he literally has Jesus interpret this parable to his disciples: “The one who sows is the Son of Man; the field is the world, and the good seed are the children of the kingdom; the weeds are the children of the evil one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are angels” (Matthew 13:37-39).

This should remind you of Augustine’s and Origen’s absolutely absurd allegorical interpretation of the Good Samaritan, in which literally every element of that story is a stand-in for something else (the inn, for example, is the Church). This way of reading parables has been criticized by everyone from John Calvin to CH Dodd (who, by the way, coined the term “realized eschatology”). The idea that Jesus himself would interpret his own parable (which defeats the purpose of a parable) in such a heavy-handed way is, quite frankly, absurd, and so Matthew’s usage if not the saying itself must fall under heavy suspicion.

Go back Continue Reading

Previous Post

July 17, 2016

Genesis - The Hope of the Exiled (And Some Funny Stuff, Too)

Next Post

July 24, 2016 Exodus - Israel Deals With Its Separation Anxiety

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Activism Bible Communism Communism and Socialism Faith Historical Jesus History Justice Millennials Personal Politics The Kingdom of God Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz