Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Politics and Religion
Are frozen embryos really children? Abortion 1

Are frozen embryos really children? Abortion 1

Last updated on: March 1, 2024 at 9:05 am by Ted Peters

Are frozen embryos really children? Abortion 1 2024-03-01T09:05:27-08:00 Ted Peters

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Are frozen embryos really children?

Are frozen embryos really children? Should we grant every right belonging to a living child to a test tube stored in liquid nitrogen? Should we prosecute for murder a nurse who accidentally drops one on the floor? Might we get arrested for being negligent?

The Supreme Court of Alabama thinks that frozen embryos are children with legal protections against murder. This court ruling slammed Alabama family formation like a hurricane hitting the Gulf coast. Medical clinics offering reproductive technologies fear litigation that could put them out of business. So they closed.

What is of special interest to the public theologian here is that the supreme court appealed to biblical and theological reasoning to justify its ruling. Let’s look at this theological reasoning first in Alabama and then, in our next Patheos post, Roman Catholic bioethics. All of this will be pertinent to the public discussion of abortion access around which much of the 2024 presidential election controversy swirls.

Just what is at issue?

Might we get arrested for being negligent in an IVF clinic? Yes. This is the implication of the 8 to 1 ruling by Alabama’s supreme court on February 16, 2024. An existing law — wrongful death of a minor — covers not just fetuses in the womb, but also embryos held in a cryogenic storage facility. Unimplanted embryos created by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) are often frozen and eventually destroyed. If five eggs are fertilized and one is successfully implanted, the remaining four get discarded. Does this constitute abortion or even murder?

42% of adult Americans say they or someone they know have used fertility treatments. Baby-making with such assisted reproductive technology accounts for around 2% of US pregnancies. Should our nation withdraw from IVF family formation?

What happened in Alabama?

Are frozen embryos really children? Chief Justice Tom Parker, Supreme Coutr of Alabama

Here’s the justification for LePage v. The Center for Reproductive Medicine before the Supreme Court of Alabama.

“…unborn human life is sacred. We believe that each human being, from the moment of conception, is made in the image of God, created by Him to reflect His likeness. It is as if the People of Alabama took what was spoken of the prophet Jeremiah and applied it to every unborn person in this state: “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, ‘Before you were born I sanctified you’.” Jeremiah 1:5 (NKJV 1982) (Alabama 2024, 48).

Here’s the implication that concerns us: by declaring frozen embryos ex vivo (extrauterine or outside the mother’s body) to be children with protective rights, frozen embryos may not be discarded or destroyed or even treated with negligence. “Upholding the sanctity of unborn life, including unborn life that exists outside the womb…including the right to life” is the chief concern of Chief Justice Tom Parker. Parker’s opinion relies heavily on theological rumination.

“But the principle itself — that human life is fundamentally distinct from other forms of life and cannot be taken intentionally without justification has deep roots that reach back to the creation of man ‘in the image of God’. Genesis 1:27 (King James) (Alabama 2024, 33).”

In short, because the human person is created in the image of God, an individual life cannot be taken without extraordinary justification. After quoting Augustine, John Calvin, and the Dutch Reformed tradition, Parker summarizes his argument against negligently handling frozen embryos.

“In summary, the theologically based view of the sanctity of life adopted by the People of Alabama encompasses the following: (1) God made every person in His image; (2) each person therefore has a value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate; and (3) human 37 SC-2022-0515; SC- 2022-0579 life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God, who views the destruction of His image as an affront to Himself. Section 36.06 recognizes that this is true of unborn human life no less than it is of all other human life that even before birth, all human beings bear the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory (Alabama 2024, 37-38).”

Any dissenters? Yes, one. Justice Greg Cook dissented. “A frozen embryo does not fit within the statutory definition of ‘person’ as that term is used in Alabama’s criminal-homicide statutes and thus cannot be a ‘minor child’ under the Wrongful Death Act” (Alabama 2024, 116).

Getting clear in Alabama

Are frozen embryos really children? Source: Christianity Today

The Supreme Court of Alabama decision risks misinterpretation. The decision did not ban IVF. To the contrary, the decision scared the legal pants off IVF clinics by making them liable for any accidental abortions of cryopreserved embryos. This ruling shut down reproductive services out of fear of litigation. Writing in First Things, Ryan T. Anderson celebrates the Alabama achievement.

“The media didn’t just overreact to a judge’s mentioning God as the source of the sanctity of life. They falsely claimed IVF was about to be banned—and Republicans fell for the claim. In reality, the Alabama civil (not criminal) case was brought by the parents of IVF children, not opponents of IVF. The clinic keeping their embryonic children in cryopreservation had not provided adequate protection, so a patient managed to wander in and remove several embryos, causing their deaths. The parents sued to hold the clinic accountable for the wrongful death of their children. And the Alabama Supreme Court held that a statute protecting minors (including, as precedent held, embryos in the womb) contained no exception for embryos outside the womb. Far from attempting to ban IVF, the parents who brought this lawsuit were trying to protect frozen embryonic children, and rightly so.”

Let’s get it straight. The high court is not banning IVF baby-making. Rather, it is drawing out implications of proscribing abortion on the grounds that morally protected human dignity is established at conception. If you believe that we receive the image of God at conception, then we are legally protected even if we live as a frozen embryo on a nitrogen tank.

Facing public pressure to get IVF services resumed in the state, on February 29, 2024, both chambers of the Alabama Legislature advanced legislation that would extend lawsuit protections to clinics. But, this legislation does not address the philosophical issue of whether the frozen embryo enjoys the same protective rights that children do.

Pre-Conclusion: Further Discourse Clarification is Warranted

I wish to thank the justices of the Supreme Court of Alabama for their compassionate approach to the question of protecting the life and wellbeing of children yet to be born. I further wish to thank the justices for admitting relevant biblical and theological evidence into their reasoning.

Nevertheless, I must concur with the dissent. When we ask our scientists to tell us what happens in nature to the early embryo, we learn that the court’s majority opinion loses its empirical foundation. We cannot say biologically that the extrauterine embryo before implantation in the mother’s uterus on the 14th day constitutes an individual human person. I will provide detail in the next Patheos posts.

All of this warrants discourse clarification on the part of the public theologian. To that task we now turn. In what follows we will rely on background information regarding recent Roman Catholic bioethics.

SR 5101. Abortion 1. Are frozen embryos really children?

SR 5102. Abortion 2. Protecting Embryos in the Vatican

Abortion Access for Women’s Health? What about the Baby?

▓

Ted Peters pursues Public Theology at the intersection of science, religion, ethics, and public policy. Peters is an emeritus professor at the Graduate Theological Union, where he co-edits the journal, Theology and Science, on behalf of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, in Berkeley, California, USA. His book, God in Cosmic History, traces the rise of the Axial religions 2500 years ago. He tackled the implications of genetic innovation for the future of humanity in Playing God? Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom? (Routledge, 2nd ed., 2002) as well as For the Love of Children: Genetic Technology and the Future of the Family (Westminster/John Knox 1997). His essays are collected in Science, Theology, and Ethics (Ashgate 2003) The Voice of Public Theology (ATF 2023).

Recently Ted edited AI and IA: Utopia or Extinction? (ATF 2019). Along with Arvin Gouw and Brian Patrick Green, he co-edited the new book, Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics hot off the press (Roman and Littlefield/Lexington, 2022). His fictional spy thriller, Cyrus Twelve, follows the twists and turns of a transhumanist plot.

Visit Ted Peters’ website, TedsTimelyTake.com.

▓

References

Alabama. LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medicine. Ruling, file:///C:/Users/Ted/OneDrive/Documents/My%20Research/2024%20Alabama%20Supreme%20Ct%20IVF%20text.pdf: Supreme Court of Alabama, 2024.

Peters, Ted, Karen Lebacqz, and and Gaymon Bennett. Sacred Cells? Why Christians Should Support Stem Cell Research. New York: Roman and Littlefield, 2008.

Politics and Religion

Supreme Court of Alabama

About Ted Peters

Ted Peters pursues Public Theology at the intersection of science, religion, ethics, and public policy. Peters is an emeritus professor at the Graduate Theological Union, where he co-edits the journal, Theology and Science, on behalf of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, in Berkeley, California, USA. His book, God in Cosmic History, traces the rise of the Axial religions 2500 years ago. He tackled the implications of genetic innovation for the future of humanity in Playing God? Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom? (Routledge, 2nd ed., 2002) as well as For the Love of Children: Genetic Technology and the Future of the Family (Westminster/John Knox 1997). His essays are collected in Science, Theology, and Ethics (Ashgate 2003) The Voice of Public Theology (ATF 2023). Recently Ted edited AI and IA: Utopia or Extinction? (ATF 2019). Along with Arvin Gouw and Brian Patrick Green, he co-edited the new book, Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics hot off the press (Roman and Littlefield/Lexington, 2022). His fictional spy thriller, Cyrus Twelve, follows the twists and turns of a transhumanist plot. Visit Ted Peters’ website, TedsTimelyTake.com. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

February 27, 2024

Christian Nationalism on our Doorstep

Next Post

March 1, 2024 Protecting Embryos in the Vatican, Abortion 2

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Afterlife America in Crisis Ancient Alien Apocalypse Art Artificial Intelligence Astrobiology Astrotheology Atheism Big History Buddhist Catholic Christian Nationalism Christmas Comparative Theology Death Ecology Ethics ETI Evangelical Evolution Existential Questions Free Will General Christian Hermeneutics Hindu https://www.patheos.com/blogs/allsetfree/2020/12/sins-we-need-to-talk-about/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Christians+For+a+Better+Christianity&utm_content=43&lct Interreligious Islam Jewish Justice Latter-Day Saints Literature Literature and Theology Lutheran Methodism Mormonism Nonreligious ontology Orthodox Pagam Prayer progressive Christian PT 6 Dignity Public Theology Race racial justice Religious Liberty Romance Satan Scapegoat Science & Religion Science and Religion social justice Spirituality SR 8 Transhumanism Systematic Theology Taoism Ted Peters UAP UFO Uncategorized War

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What sign did God give Hezekiah to show he would be healed?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The sun's shadow went backward Fire from heaven Rain in drought A river turned to blood